Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Behavioural Neurology
Volume 2017, Article ID 8349242, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8349242
Research Article

Effects of Robot-Assisted Training for the Unaffected Arm in Patients with Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy: A Proof-of-Concept Pilot Study

1Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
2Polyfunctional Center “Don Calabria”, Verona, Italy
3Neurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
4Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
5Department of Neurology, Hochzirl Hospital, Zirl, Austria
6Research Unit of Neurorehabilitation, Bolzano, South Tyrol, Italy
7Villa Melitta Rehabilitation Clinic, Bolzano, Italy
8Health Sciences Department, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
9Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Section, “OORR” Hospital, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Alessandro Picelli; ti.rvinu@illecip.ordnassela

Received 9 February 2017; Revised 26 April 2017; Accepted 29 May 2017; Published 6 July 2017

Academic Editor: Jun Yao

Copyright © 2017 Alessandro Picelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Colver, C. Fairhurst, and P. O. Pharoah, “Cerebral palsy,” The Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9924, pp. 1240–1249, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  2. P. Rosenbaum, N. Paneth, A. Leviton et al., “A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology Supplement, vol. 109, pp. 8–14, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  3. L. B. Reid, S. E. Rose, and R. N. Boyd, “Rehabilitation and neuroplasticity in children with unilateral cerebral palsy,” Nature Reviews. Neurology, vol. 11, pp. 390–400, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  4. E. V. Kirkpatrick, J. E. Pearse, J. A. Eyre, and A. P. Basu, “Motor planning ability is not related to lesion side or functional manual ability in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 231, no. 2, pp. 239–247, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  5. R. Benini and M. I. Shevell, “Updates in the treatment of spasticity associated with cerebral palsy,” Current Treatment Options in Neurology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 650–659, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Picelli, E. L. Marchina, F. Gajofatto et al., “Sonographic and clinical effects of botulinum toxin type A combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy on spastic muscles of children with cerebral palsy,” Developmental Neurorehabilitation, vol. 20, pp. 160–164, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Mutsaarts, B. Steenbergen, and H. Bekkering, “Anticipatory planning of movement sequences in hemiparetic cerebral palsy,” Motor Control, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 439–458, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  8. M. Mutsaarts, B. Steenbergen, and H. Bekkering, “Anticipatory planning deficits and task context effects in hemiparetic cerebral palsy,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 151–162, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  9. A. M. Gordon, “Impaired voluntary movement control and its rehabilitation in cerebral palsy,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 957, pp. 291–311, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  10. M. L. Aisen, D. Kerkovich, J. Mast et al., “Cerebral palsy: clinical care and neurological rehabilitation,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 844–852, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  11. B. Steenbergen and A. M. Gordon, “Activity limitation in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: evidence for disorders in motor planning,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 780–783, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  12. E. Papathanasiou, M. Chevignard, C. Vuillerot, A. Tiberghien, and I. Godard, “Pediatric stroke rehabilitation: a review of techniques facilitating motor recovery,” Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 59S, article e2, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  13. C. Geroin, S. Mazzoleni, N. Smania et al., “Systematic review of outcome measures of walking training using electromechanical and robotic devices in patients with stroke,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 987–996, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  14. J. Mehrholz, M. Pohl, T. Platz, J. Kugler, and B. Elsner, “Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 11, article CD006876, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  15. N. Smania, M. Gandolfi, V. Marconi et al., “Applicability of a new robotic walking aid in a patient with cerebral palsy. Case report,” European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 147–153, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Gilliaux, A. Renders, D. Dispa et al., “Upper limb robot-assisted therapy in cerebral palsy: a single-blind randomized controlled trial,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 183–192, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  17. A. C. Turconi, E. Biffi, C. Maghini, E. Peri, F. Servodio Iammarone, and C. Gagliardi, “Can new technologies improve upper limb performance in grown-up diplegic children?” European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 672–681, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  18. G. A. Manson, M. Alekhina, S. L. Srubiski, C. K. Williams, A. Bhattacharjee, and L. Tremblay, “Effects of robotic guidance on sensorimotor control: planning vs. online control?” Neuro Rehabilitation, vol. 35, pp. 689–700, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  19. C. Crajé, M. van Elk, M. Beeren, H. T. van Schie, H. Bekkering, and B. Steenbergen, “Compromised motor planning and motor imagery in right hemiparetic cerebral palsy,” Research in Developmental Disabilities, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1313–1322, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  20. M. van Elk, C. Crajé, M. E. Beeren, B. Steenbergen, H. T. van Schie, and H. Bekkering, “Neural evidence for impaired action selection in right hemiparetic cerebral palsy,” Brain Research, vol. 1349, pp. 56–67, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  21. S. V. Duff and A. M. Gordon, “Learning of grasp control in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 746–757, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  22. A. M. Gordon, J. Charles, and S. V. Duff, “Fingertip forces during object manipulation in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. II: bilateral coordination,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 176–185, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  23. A. W. Goodwin, “Sensorimotor coordination in cerebral palsy,” The Lancet, vol. 353, no. 9170, pp. 2090-2091, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. van Meeteren, C. Nieuwenhuijsen, A. de Grund, H. J. Stam, and M. E. Roebroeck, “Using the manual ability classification system in young adults with cerebral palsy and normal intelligence,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 32, no. 23, pp. 1885–1893, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  25. C. Morris, J. J. Kurinczuk, R. Fitzpatrick, and P. L. Rosenbaum, “Reliability of the manual ability classification system for children with cerebral palsy,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 950–953, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  26. A. Choudhary, S. Gulati, M. Kabra et al., “Efficacy of modified constraint induced movement therapy in improving upper limb function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial,” Brain and Development, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 870–876, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  27. K. Xu, L. Wang, J. Mai, and L. He, “Efficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy and electrical stimulation on hand function of children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a controlled clinical trial,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 337–346, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  28. L. A. Speth, P. Leffers, Y. J. Janssen-Potten, and J. S. Vles, “Botulinum toxin A and upper limb functional skills in hemiparetic cerebral palsy: a randomized trial in children receiving intensive therapy,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 468–473, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  29. S. E. Reedman, S. Beagley, L. Sakzewski, and R. N. Boyd, “The Jebsen Taylor test of hand function: a pilot test-retest reliability study in typically developing children,” Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 292–304, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  30. R. H. Jebsen, N. E. Taylor, R. B. Trieschmann, M. J. Trotter, and L. A. Howard, “An objective and standardized test of hand function,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 311–319, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  31. M. W. Short and J. H. Cauraugh, “Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control: end-state comfort and point-of-change effects,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 96, no. 1-2, pp. 133–147, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  32. R. G. Cohen and D. A. Rosenbaum, “Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 157, no. 4, pp. 486–495, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  33. D. A. Rosenbaum, J. Vaughan, H. J. Barnes, and M. J. Jorgensen, “Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation,” The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1058–1073, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  34. J. P. Thibaut and L. Toussaint, “Developing motor planning over ages,” The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 116–129, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  35. C. Crajé, P. Aarts, M. Nijhuis-van der Sanden, and B. Steenbergen, “Action planning in typically and atypically developing children (unilateral cerebral palsy),” Research in Developmental Disabilities, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1039–1046, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  36. B. J. Casey, N. Tottenham, C. Liston, and S. Durston, “Imaging the developing brain: what have we learned about cognitive development?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 104–110, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  37. B. Steenbergen, R. G. Meulenbroek, and D. A. Rosenbaum, “Constraints on grip selection in hemiparetic cerebral palsy: effects of lesional side, end-point accuracy and context,” Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 145–159, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  38. L. Janssen, R. G. Meulenbroek, and B. Steenbergen, “Behavioral evidence for left-hemisphere specialization of motor planning,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 209, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  39. P. Baraldi, C. A. Porro, M. Serafini et al., “Bilateral representation of sequential finger movements in human cortical areas,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 269, no. 2, pp. 95–98, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  40. A. M. Gordon and S. V. Duff, “Fingertip forces during object manipulation in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. I: anticipatory scaling,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 166–175, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  41. M. Staudt, “Reorganization after pre- and perinatal brain lesions,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 217, no. 4, pp. 469–474, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  42. J. A. Eyre, S. Miller, G. J. Clowry, E. A. Conway, and C. Watts, “Functional corticospinal projections are established prenatally in the human foetus permitting involvement in the development of spinal motor centres,” Brain, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 51–64, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  43. J. A. Eyre, J. P. Taylor, F. Villagra, M. Smith, and S. Miller, “Evidence of activity-dependent withdrawal of corticospinal projections during human development,” Neurology, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1543–1554, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  44. M. Staudt, W. Grodd, C. Gerloff, M. Erb, J. Stitz, and I. Krägeloh-Mann, “Two types of ipsilateral reorganization in congenital hemiparesis: a TMS and fMRI study,” Brain, vol. 125, no. 10, pp. 2222–2237, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  45. M. Wilke, M. Staudt, H. Juenger, W. Grodd, C. Braun, and I. Krägeloh-Mann, “Somatosensory system in two types of motor reorganization in congenital hemiparesis: topography and function,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 776–788, 2009. View at Google Scholar