Research Article
Effects of Robot-Assisted Training for the Unaffected Arm in Patients with Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy: A Proof-of-Concept Pilot Study
Table 2
Performance on outcome measures.
| Outcome | Participants | Hand | Baseline | Between-group comparisons at baseline (unaffected versus dominant) | After treatment | Within-group comparisons (after treatment versus baseline) |
| Nine-Hole Peg Test (s) Mean (SD) | CP patients | Affected | 31.5 (4.3) | | 32.3 (10.6) | () | Unaffected | 13.8 (4.6) | () | 12.6 (1.2) | () | Healthy controls | Dominant | 11.5 (1.3) | | | Nondominant | 12.1 (1.1) | | | |
| Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function test (s) Mean (SD) | CP patients | Affected | 17.9 (13.3) | | 14.5 (6.9) | () | Unaffected | 6.6 (1.8) | () | 5.5 (1.1) | () | Healthy controls | | 5.1 (0.7) | | | Dominant | Nondominant | 7.4 (1.3) | | |
| Action planning (%) Mean (SD) | Stick Test | CP patients | Unaffected | 86.3 (15.1) | () | 93.3 (11.2) | () | Healthy controls | Dominant | 100.0 (0) | | | Hammer Test | CP patients | Unaffected | 58.3 (33.6) | () | 75.8 (20.2) | () | Healthy controls | Dominant | 94.7 (7.7) | | |
|
|
CP: cerebral palsy; s: seconds; SD: standard deviation; %: percentage. Statistically significant ().
|