[Retracted] The Impact of Online Learning System on Students Affected with Stroke Disease
Table 3
Correlations d (b).
S7
S8
S9
S10
S1
Pearson correlation
-.027
-.016
-.087
.b
Sig. (2-tailed)
.425
.633
.011
.
S2
Pearson correlation
.080
-.101
-.111
.b
Sig. (2-tailed)
.020
.003
.001
.
S3
Pearson correlation
-.093
-.068
-.078
.b
Sig. (2-tailed)
.006
.049
.024
.
S4
Pearson correlation
.006
-.055
-.015
.b
Sig. (2-tailed)
.864
.109
.656
.
S5
Pearson correlation
.123
-.014
-.018
.b
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
.692
.610
.
S6
Pearson correlation
.061
-.023
-.034
.b
Sig. (2-tailed)
.074
.509
.315
.
S7
Pearson correlation
1
.006
-.021
.b
Sig. (2-tailed)
.854
.537
.
S8
Pearson correlation
.006
1
.380
.b
Sig. (2-tailed)
.854
.000
.
S9
Pearson correlation
-.021
.380
1
.b
Sig. (2-tailed)
.537
.000
.
S10
Pearson correlation
.b
.b
.b
.b
Sig. (2-tailed)
.
.
.
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). bIt cannot be computed because at least one of the variables is constant. dList wise .