Biochemistry Research International

Biochemistry Research International / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 348712 |

Zahra Zamani, Mohammad Arjmand, Farideh Vahabi, Seyed Mahmood Eshaq Hosseini, Sadegh Mohammad Fazeli, Ayda Iravani, Parastoo Bayat, Akbar Oghalayee, Mahshid Mehrabanfar, Reza Haj Hosseini, Mohammad Tashakorpour, Mohsen Tafazzoli, Sedigheh Sadeghi, "A Metabolic Study on Colon Cancer Using 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy", Biochemistry Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 348712, 7 pages, 2014.

A Metabolic Study on Colon Cancer Using 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Academic Editor: R. J. Linhardt
Received11 May 2014
Accepted13 Jul 2014
Published14 Aug 2014


Background. Colorectal carcinoma is the third cause of cancer deaths in the world. For diagnosis, invasive methods like colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy are used, and noninvasive screening tests are not very accurate. We decided to study the potential of 1HNMR spectroscopy with metabolomics and chemometrics as a preliminary noninvasive test. We obtained a distinguishing pattern of metabolites and metabolic pathways between colon cancer patient and normal. Methods. Sera were obtained from confirmed colon cancer patients and the same number of healthy controls. Samples were sent for 1HNMR spectroscopy and analysis was carried out Chenomex and MATLAB software. Metabolites were identified using Human Metabolic Data Base (HDMB) and the main metabolic cycles were identified using Metaboanalyst software. Results. 15 metabolites were identified such as pyridoxine, orotidine, and taurocholic acid. Main metabolic cycles involved were the bile acid biosynthesis, vitamin B6 metabolism, methane metabolism, and glutathione metabolism. Discussion. The main detected metabolic cycles were also reported earlier in different cancers. Our observations corroborated earlier studies that suggest the importance of lowering serum LCA/DCA and increasing vitamin B6 intake to help prevent colon cancer. This work can be looked upon as a preliminary step in using 1HNMR analysis as a screening test before invasive procedures.

1. Introduction

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) ranked third as the cause of cancer death in the world. It is estimated that 142,820 people will be diagnosed with CRC and 50,830 men and women will die of it in 2014. In the US the death rate has dropped due to screening and the age-adjusted incidence rate is 45.0 per 100,000 [1]. The mortality rate in the US has dipped sharply due to public awareness and insurance support for screening tests after the age of fifty. In Iran the case of CRC is on the rise from 6 to 7.9 per 100,000 in 2005 to 38.0 per 100,000 in 2012 and is the fourth common cancer [2].

CRC screening is carried out by different procedures such as fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, virtual colonoscopy, and double contrast barium enema (DCBE). Each has its own advantages and disadvantages. A digital rectal exam (DRE) during routine physical examinations is performed by some physicians and they may use this procedure to check the lower part of the rectum [3].

Noninvasive methods do not seem to be very accurate but are more economical and easier to perform. There are two FOBT tests to detect the presence of hemoglobin in stool. One uses a dye for detection, guaiac FOBT, and the other fecal immunochemical testing uses specific immunoglobulin. This method is performed every two or three years for individuals above fifty years and is effective in reducing the cases of CRC by 15 to 33 percent [4]. A digital rectal exam and contrast barium enema are also used for screening but cannot detect about 50% of polyps identified by colonoscopy [5]. Sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy are invasive but seem to be the most effective tools of diagnosis of CRC [6, 7]. A combination of methods used depends on many factors such as patient history, age, and insurance coverage in many countries [8].

The genetic changes in CRC have been studied extensively. Metabolomics represents one of the new omics sciences which takes advantage of the unique presence and concentration of small molecules in tissues and body fluids to make a fingerprint that can be unique to the individual. Metabolomics has the potential to serve an important role in diagnosis and management of many human disorders such as CRC. More investigations are required as small molecules like the metabolites are difficult to characterize and require high throughput technology [9]. Recently with the advent of new technology like mass spectrometry and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (1HNMR), the provision for analyzing small molecules are carried out [10]. After obtaining the spectral pattern for the required samples, chemometrics is done using different mathematical modeling like principle component analysis (PCA), partial linear square (PLS), or PLS-DA (discriminate analysis) [11, 12]. This gives us a pattern to distinguish the metabolites between normal and abnormal samples. Using the pattern obtained by the differentiating chemical shifts and the Human Metabolome Database (HDMB), the metabolites are identified. Using other software like Metaboanalyst and KEGG pathway analysis, the main pathways involved are obtained [13].

Since most CRC screening methods such as colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy are invasive, we decided to use high throughput technology and find out a metabolite pattern for cancer patients which would differentiate them from normal.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

5 mL of blood was collected from people who were on a liquid diet for at least 48 hours and were referred for colonoscopy to the Gastroenterology Department at Amir Alam Hospital, Tehran. One group comprised of 33 patients diagnosed with cancer by colonoscopy and biopsy and the second group of individuals without colon cancer. Sera were separated and stored at −80°C. All groups were made to fill a consent form as per the requirements of Pasteur Institute Ethics Committee before serum collection.

2.2. Sample Preparation for 1HNMR Spectroscopy

600 μL of serum with 70 μL D2O and 1 mM sodium 2-trimethylsilylpropionate (TMSP) was used as internal reference in a 5 mm NMR tube at room temperature and data acquisition was carried out.

For NMR data collection, one-dimensional 1HNMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker DRX-500 NMR spectrometer operating at 500.13 MHZ and Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) 90-(t-180-tn-acqusition) (, ) pulse sequence as described earlier.

Analysis of data and pattern recognition were performed using Chenomix 6.4 software.

2.3. Chemometrics Analysis
2.3.1. Principle Component Analysis (PCA)

Initially the NMR variables were mean centered; then PCA was used to detect the outliers data [11] for detecting strong outliers and by Q residuals for detecting modest outliers with 95% confidence level.

2.3.2. Partial Linear Square (PLS)

PLS is a supervised method that uses multivariate regression technique to extract via linear combination of original variables (X) the information that can predict the class membership (Y). PLS was applied after OSC using the Y matrix including 0 for normal and 1 for abnormal for all the data set. PLS was performed with and without OSC and results were obtained with more than 95% confidence [12].

OSC filters were developed to remove unwanted variation from spectral data. PLS was applied after OSC using the Y matrix including 0 for normal and 1 for abnormal for all the data set described formerly [14]. Matrix X comprises of 1HNMR data of samples from normals and matrix Y samples from cancer patients. OSC subtracts from X, factors that account for as much as possible the variance in X and are orthogonal to Y. It is important to avoid overfitting after OSC treatment, so as to prevent poor predictive performance. Hence, precise determination of the number of removed OSC factors is very important. Only one factor was removed.

2.3.3. Human Metabolome Database (HDMB)

The NMR search link of HDMB was used to detect the metabolites of certain chemical shifts which contains information about metabolites found in the human body [15].

2.3.4. Metabolic Pathway Analysis

It was performed with Metaboanalyst 2.0 for pathway analysis and visualization. These pathways were affected by the metabolites in colon cancer patients.

3. Results

PLS was applied after OSC using the Y matrix including 0 for normal and 1 for abnormal for all the data set. PLS was performed with and without OSC and results were obtained with more than 95% confidence level. Figures 1 and 2 show a complete separation pattern between the colon cancer and the normal groups. Figure 3 shows loading plot of the samples which is an indicator of ascending and descending level of metabolites. With the help of the numbers and chemical shifts, 13 metabolites were identified as shown in Table 1. 15 metabolic pathways were detected from the above-differentiating metabolites after an enrichment analysis was carried out in Figure 4. Overrepresentation analysis, as shown in Table 2, was done to detect the impact of pathways, depending on the number of changed metabolites and to test if a particular group of compounds is represented more than expected by chance within the user uploaded compound list in the Metaboanalyst software. In the context of pathway analysis, compounds involved in a particular pathway are enriched and compared by random hits as tested. The detailed results from the pathway analysis are depicted in Table 2, and, since many pathways are tested at the same time, the statistical values from enrichment analysis are further adjusted for multiple tests.

Number of metaboliteName of metabolite in serumHDMB number Level in serum

4Pyridoxamine HMDB01431
5Glycocholic acid HMDB00138
8Taurocholic acidHMDB00036
93-Hydroxybutyric acidHMDB00357
107-Ketocholesterol HMDB00501
113-Hydroxyisovaleric acid HMDB00754
13Cholesterol HMDB00067
15Glycine HMDB00123

Differentiating metabolites detected from their chemical shifts and identified by HDMB. Ascending and descending levels of metabolites shown in the sera with arrows.

TotalExpectedHits Raw

Primary bile acid biosynthesis470.234
Vitamin B6 metabolism320.162
Synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies60.031
Cyanoamino acid metabolism160.081
Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism200.101
Thiamine metabolism240.121
Methane metabolism340.171
Glutathione metabolism380.191
Nitrogen metabolism390.191
Butanoate metabolism400.201
Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation400.201
Lysine degradation470.231
Fructose and mannose metabolism480.241
Glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism480.241
Fatty acid metabolism500.251
Cysteine and methionine metabolism560.281
Pyrimidine metabolism600.301
Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis750.371
Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism880.441
Purine metabolism920.461
Steroid hormone biosynthesis990.491
Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism1040.521

The Total is the total number of compounds in the pathway and the Hits are actually matched number from the user uploaded data. The Raw is the original value calculated from the enrichment analysis.

4. Discussion

In this study a number of metabolites and their pathways were detected which have an important impact on colon cancer. Of all the cycles involved, primary bile acid biosynthesis and degradation of ketone bodies and cyanoamino acid metabolism were the major ones (Table 2). Of all the metabolites involved, the main ones were cholesterol, glycine, glycocholic acid, and taurocholic acid which are involved in primary bile acid biosynthesis. Secondary bile acids are formed by enzymatic deconjugation and dehydroxylation of the primary bile acids by anaerobic bacteria in the large intestine. Reports show the presence of higher deoxycholic acids in serum and bile of the patients with colonic adenomas than in the healthy controls [16]. Studies have shown that these secondary bile acids exhibit tumour-promoting ability in animals and they could trigger apoptosis and may also act as regulatory molecules involved in different cell signaling pathways in colon cells [17]. It is interesting that the ratio of LCA (lithocholic acid)/DCA (deoxycholic acid) may be an important factor to distinguish tendency to colon cancer [18]. Reduction of LCA/DCA is reported on experiments carried out on rats fed on a high diet supplemented with vitamin B6 [19]. The second metabolic cycle involved in colon cancer is vitamin B6. There are several theories for the role of this vitamin. It upregulates a protective factor, insulin like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP1); its mRNA is upregulated in HT29 colon carcinoma cells exposed to pyridoxal (a form of vitamin B6). IGFBP1 is secreted from the liver and is hypothesized to exert a protective role in the development of cancer and cardiovascular diseases [20]. ELISA indicated analysis showed that supplemental vitamin B6 significantly lowered levels of colonic HSP70, heme-oxygenase-1, and HSP32 which increase cell proliferation and colonic damage. Heat shock proteins (HSPs, molecular chaperones) have been suggested to be associated with colon carcinogenesis [21]. In mice receiving the colonic carcinogen azoxymethane, the development of colonic aberrant crypt foci, precursor lesions of colon cancer, and cell proliferation are suppressed by vitamin B6 supplementation [22].

The next effective cycle is the synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies with 3-hydroxybutyric acid as the metabolite involved. It is interesting to note that recent studies suggest that a ketogenic diet helps overcome different kinds of cancers. This is attributed to the fact that most malignant cells depend on glucose as fuel and cannot metabolize fatty acids easily due to dysfunction of the mitochondria. Malignant cells grown in vitro are negatively affected by low glucose and a similar antitumorigenic property of low carbohydrate diets is shown in mice in vivo experiments [23]. 3-Hydroxybutyric acid is also a biomarker detected by GC-MS from sera of colorectal patients [24].

Glycine is a very important metabolite as it takes part in the next four cycles of cyanoamino metabolism, thiamine metabolism, methane metabolism, and glutathione metabolism. Association between increase in serum glycine and colon cancer has been shown in many studies [25]. Glycine is differentiating metabolites for colon cancer as seen in metabolomic studies by time of flight mass spectrometry (TOFMS) [26]. An in vitro study carried out on cancer cells by metabolite profiling indicates key role of glycine in cancer cell proliferation [27].

Thiamine or vitamin B1 has an important role in cancer cells as shown by investigations using the thiamine-degrading enzyme, thiaminase. Liu et al. showed that the addition of thiaminase into cell culture media containing thiamine had a significant inhibitory effect on growth of breast cancer cells [28]. Also a pegylated version of thiaminase was capable in delaying tumor growth and prolonging survival in an RS4 leukemia xenograft model [29, 30] and it is seen that the increased glycine and thiamine are linked.

Methane metabolism by bacteria in the large intestine has been reported as early as 1977. This report showed that excretion of methane in breath occurred twice as frequent in patients with colonic cancer as normal individuals [31]. This suggests the difference between the anaerobic intestinal flora in patients and normal subjects and implies that colorectal cancer may be caused by carcinogens formed by nuclear bile acid dehydrogenation in the large intestine by anaerobic bacteria [32]. The glutathione pathway is seen after increasing glycine. Glutathione levels in primary colorectal cancer tissues were significantly higher than in the corresponding normal tissues. Reports show that elevated glutathione levels had a significant negative effect on survival rate in patients with colorectal cancer [33].

Reports have shown that in colon cancer the metabolism and catabolism of amino acid increase. Glycine also is seen to participate in glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism which increases in colon cancer and is part of nitrogen metabolism [34].

(R)-3-Hydroxybutyric acid is very important in butanoate metabolism. The antitumor effects of butyrate were described in studies using colorectal cancer cell lines in which butyrate inhibits growth and induces differentiation and apoptosis [35]. In other studies butyrate was able to inhibit tumor growth in vivo in murine models [36]. But there are conflicting reports about the protective role of butyrate as seen that colorectal cells still increase and grow even though there are high concentrations of butyrate in the colon [37].

Fucose and mannose metabolism are affected by L-fucose which is an important posttranslational modification in cancer and inflammation. Sera and total cellular proteins of cancer patients showed increase in fucosylation levels and recently some fucosylated proteins have been identified as novel cancer biomarkers in glycoproteomic analyses [38].

5. Conclusions

Using 1HNMR analysis and chemometrics, a differentiation pattern was obtained between the metabolites in the sera of colon cancer patients and normals. Using HDMB 15 main metabolites were identified and Metaboanalyst software detected 13 metabolic cycles which had been reported as playing an important part in cancers and tumor progression. The main pathways were bile acid biosynthesis and vitamin B6 biosynthesis, and our study corroborates early findings and suggests the importance of lowering serum LCA/DCA and increasing vitamin B6 intake to help prevention of colon cancer.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests with each other in this work.

Authors’ Contribution

The authors have all participated equally in carrying out this project.


The authors acknowledge the Pasteur Institute of Iran for funding this project.


  1. “Cancer Facts and Figures for African Americans,” Amrican Cancer Society, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Safaee, S. R. Fatemi, S. Ashtari, M. Vahedi, B. Moghimi-Dehkordi, and M. R. Zali, “Four years incidence rate of colorectal cancer in iran: a survey of national cancer registry data-implications for screening,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 2695–2698, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. A. Lieberman, “Screening for colorectal cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 361, no. 12, pp. 1138–1187, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. F. Collins, D. A. Lieberman, T. E. Durbin, and D. G. Weiss, “Accuracy of screening for fecal occult blood on a single stool sample obtained by digital rectal examination: a comparison with recommended sampling practice,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 81–85, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  5. D. L. Ouyang, J. J. Chen, R. H. Getzenberg, and R. E. Schoen, “Noninvasive testing for colorectal cancer: a review,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 1393–1403, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. J. Pickhardt, J. R. Choi, I. Hwang et al., “Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 349, no. 23, pp. 2191–2200, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. D. Johnson, M. H. Chen, A. Y. Toledano et al., “Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 12, pp. 1207–1217, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  8. S. Summerton, E. Little, and M. S. Cappell, “CT colonography: current status and future promise,” Gastroenterology Clinics of North America, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 161–189, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Rajpal and A. P. Venook, “Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population,” Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 5–7, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  10. N. V. Reo, “NMR-based metabolomics,” Drug and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 375–382, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Wold, M. Sjöström, and L. Eriksson, “PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 109–130, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. Xia, R. Mandal, I. V. Sinelnikov, D. Broadhurst, and D. S. Wishart, “MetaboAnalyst 2.0-a comprehensive server for metabolomic data analysis,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. W127–W133, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. H. Barton, J. K. Nicholson, P. Elliott, and E. Holmes, “High-throughput1H NMR-based metabolic analysis of human serum and urine for large-scale epidemiological studies: validation study,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 37, supplement 1, pp. i31–i40, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. Fearn, “On orthogonal signal correction,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. Aittokallio and B. Schwikowski, “Graph-based methods for analysing networks in cell biology,” Briefings in Bioinformatics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 243–255, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. M. Nagengast, M. J. A. L. Grubben, and I. P. Munster, “Role of bile acids in colorectal carcinogenesis,” European Journal of Oncology A, vol. 31, no. 74, pp. 1067–1070, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  17. E. J. Carey and K. D. Lindor, “Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer with ursodeoxycholic acid: cons,” Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology, vol. 36, supplement 1, pp. S61–S64, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. L. Tong, Z. H. Ran, J. Shen, G. Q. Fan, and S. D. Xiao, “Association between fecal bile acids and colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 792–803, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y. Okazaki, Z. Utama, S. Suidasari et al., “Consumption of vitamin b6 reduces fecal ratio of lithocholic acid to deoxycholic acid, a risk factor for colon cancer, in rats fed a high-fat diet,” Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 366–370, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. P. Zhang, S. Suidasari, T. Hasegawa, N. Yanaka, and N. Kato, “High concentrations of pyridoxal stimulate the expression of IGFBP1 in HepG2 cells through upregulation of the ERK/c-Jun pathway,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 973–978, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. Kayashima, K. Tanaka, Y. Okazaki, K. Matsubara, N. Yanaka, and N. Kato, “Consumption of vitamin B6 reduces colonic damage and protein expression of HSP70 and HO-1, the anti-tumor targets, in rats exposed to 1,2-dimethylhydrazine,” Oncology Letters, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1243–1246, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. de Vogel, V. Dindore, M. van Engeland, R. A. Goldbohm, P. A. van den Brandt, and M. P. Weijenberg, “Dietary folate, methionine, riboflavin, and vitamin B-6 and risk of sporadic colorectal cancer,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 138, no. 12, pp. 2372–2378, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. J. Klement and U. Kämmerer, “Is there a role for carbohydrate restriction in the treatment and prevention of cancer?” Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 8, article 75, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. W. Zhonghua and W. I. Chang, “Metabonomic profiling of serum from colorectal patients,” Bio-Medical Library, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 386–390, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  25. S. Kermorgant and T. Lehy, “Glycine-extended gastrin promotes the invasiveness of human colon cancer cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 285, no. 1, pp. 136–141, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. B. Leichtle, J. Nuoffer, U. Ceglarek et al., “Serum amino acid profiles and their alterations in colorectal cancer,” Metabolomics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 643–653, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. J. Koh, G. J. Dockray, A. Varro et al., “Overexpression of glycine-extended gastrin in transgenic mice results in increased colonic proliferation,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 1119–1126, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Liu, A. Stromberg, H. Tai, and J. A. Moscow, “Thiamine transporter gene expression and exogenous thiamine modulate the expression of genes involved in drug and prostaglandin metabolism in breast cancer cells,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 477–487, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  29. S. Liu, N. R. Monks, J. W. Hanes, T. P. Begley, H. Yu, and J. A. Moscow, “Sensitivity of breast cancer cell lines to recombinant thiaminase I,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 171–179, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. A. Zastre, B. S. Hanberry, R. L. Sweet et al., “Up-regulation of vitamin B1 homeostasis genes in breast cancer,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1616–1624, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. Haines, G. Metz, J. Dilawari, L. Blendis, and H. Wiggins, “Breath methane in patients with cancer of the large bowel,” The Lancet, vol. 2, no. 8036, pp. 481–483, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  32. J. M. Piqué, M. Pallarés, E. Cusó, J. Vilar-Bonet, and M. A. Gassull, “Methane production and colon cancer,” Gastroenterology, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 601–605, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  33. G. K. Balendiran, R. Dabur, and D. Fraser, “The role of glutathione in cancer,” Cell Biochemistry and Function, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 343–352, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. C. Denkert, J. Budczies, W. Weichert et al., “Metabolite profiling of human colon carcinoma: deregulation of TCA cycle and amino acid turnover,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 7, article 72, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. X. Leschelle, S. Delpal, M. Goubern, H. M. Blottière, and F. Blachier, “Butyrate metabolism upstream and downstream acetyl-CoA synthesis and growth control of human colon carcinoma cells,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 267, no. 21, pp. 6435–6442, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. R. Lupton, “Microbial degradation products influence colon cancer risk: the butyrate controversy,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 479–482, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  37. J. Serpa, F. Caiado, T. Carvalho et al., “Butyrate-rich colonic microenvironment is a relevant selection factor for metabolically adapted tumor cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 50, pp. 39211–39223, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. E. Kenta, N. Terao, Ch. Tan et al., “Fucosylation is a promising target for cancer diagnosis and therapy,” Biomolecules, vol. 2, pp. 34–45, 2012. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Zahra Zamani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.