|
Transducer | Method of enzyme immobilization | Working potential | Response time | Detection limit | Linearity | Storage stability | Reference |
|
Laponite clay nanoparticles-pol((12-pyrrol-1-dodecyl)triethylammonium tetrafluoroborate)/Pt disk electrode | ChO, ChE enzyme Entrapment | 0.53 V versus Ag/AgCl | 50 sec | 20 M | — | 20 days | [39] |
|
Screen printed graphite electrode | ChO, ChE, HRP, K4Fe(CN)6 Physical adsorption | −0.2 V versus Ag/AgCl | — | 2.81 mM | 2.81–13 mM | — | [40] |
|
Polydiaminonaphthalene/Pt disk | ChO, ChE Entrapment | 0.7 V versus Ag/AgCl | 15 sec | 97 M | Up to 0.8 mM | — | [41] |
|
MWCN/screen printed carbon electrode | ChO, ChE, HRP, K4Fe(CN)6 Physical adsorption | 0.3 V versus Ag/AgCl | 180 sec | 100 mg/dL | 100–400 mg/dL | 2 months |
[27] |
|
3-Aminopropyl-modified controlled-pore glass(APCEG)/rotating disk | ChO, ChE, HRP Covalent cross-linking via Glutaraldehyde | −0.15 V versus Ag/AgCl with TBC as mediator | — | 11.9 nM | 1.2 M–1 mM | 25 days | [42] |
|
PANI/ITO | ChO, ChE Covalent cross-linking via Glutaraldehyde | 0.5 V versus Ag/AgCl | 40 sec | 50 mg/dL | 50–500 mg/dL | 6 weeks | [43] |
|
HRP incorporated carbon paste | ChO, ChE Covalent cross-linking on PVC beaker |
−0.5 V versus Ag/AgCl | 20 sec | 2.5 mg/dL | 50–550 mg/dL | 100 days | [38] |
|
Nanoporous Au networks directly grown on a titanium substrate | ChO, ChE, HRP Physical adsorption Chitosan used as glue | Cyclic voltammetry | — | 0.5 mg/dL | 0.97–7.8 mM | 60 days | [44] |
|
ZnO–CuO composite matrix grown onto ITO coated corning glass | ChO, ChE Physical adsorption | Cyclic voltammetry | 5 sec | 0.5 mM | 0.5–12 mM | — | [45] |
|
c-MWCNT/AuNP | ChO, ChE, HRP Covalent cross-linking via c-MWCNT | 0.27 V versus Ag/AgCl | 20 sec | 0.5 mg/dL | 0.5–300 mg/dL | 60 days | This work |
|