Biochemistry Research International

Biochemistry Research International / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 8861798 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8861798

Lydia G. Mugao, Bernard M. Gichimu, Phyllis W. Muturi, Simon T. Mukono, "Characterization of the Volatile Components of Essential Oils of Selected Plants in Kenya", Biochemistry Research International, vol. 2020, Article ID 8861798, 8 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8861798

Characterization of the Volatile Components of Essential Oils of Selected Plants in Kenya

Academic Editor: Danni Zheng
Received27 Sep 2020
Revised24 Nov 2020
Accepted08 Dec 2020
Published15 Dec 2020

Abstract

Essential oils are secondary metabolites that plants produce for protection from pests and predators, attraction of pollinators, and seed dispersal. The oils are made up of a mixture of compounds that give a characteristic flavour and odour. Currently, essential oils are receiving great attention in research for their phytochemical and antimicrobial activities. However, there is scanty information on the chemical composition of many plants. This study provides a detailed analysis of the chemical composition of essential oils of ginger, garlic, tick berry, and Mexican marigold in Kenya. The essential oils were extracted by steam distillation and analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The study identified a total of 52 different chemical classes from the essential oils of the four different plants that were analysed. Their percentage composition was also found to vary between the test plants. The essential oils of Mexican marigold constituted the highest composition of the identified chemical classes at 71.2%, followed by ginger at 55.8%, while both tick berry and garlic oils constituted 53.8% of the total classes identified. Terpenes constituted the highest composition in the essential oils of all the four test plants. Other major chemical classes included esters, ketones, organosulfurs, alkanes, cycloalkanes, steroids, aromatic hydrocarbons, and alkanols. Some of these chemical compounds have been shown to have a huge utility potential in biopesticides, pharmaceutical, and food industries, and hence, their industrial extraction and purification from the essential oils of these plants are recommended.

1. Introduction

Essential oils are secondary metabolites that plants produce for protection from pests and predators, attraction of pollinators, or seed dispersal [1]. The oils are located in different parts of the plant such as roots, stems, leaves, flowers, fruits, and even in seeds depending on the plant species [2]. In these plant parts, the essential oil is accumulated in cells, secretory cavities, or glandular hairs [3]. Almost every part of a plant can produce essential oil, which can be extracted and exploited in various industrial ways [4]. The essential oils are highly volatile [5], transparent, and lipid-soluble liquids [6]. They are soluble in organic solvents such as benzene, toluene, acetone, ethanol, and methanol that have less density compared with water [7].

Essential oils are composed of a complex mixture of compounds which give a characteristic odour and flavour to the plants [1]. The compounds are grouped into main compounds (20–95%), secondary compounds (1–20%), and trace compounds with less than 1% concentration [8]. The flavour and aroma of plants are influenced by the type and amount of compounds present in the essential oil [9, 10]. Oxygenated monoterpenes are the major contributor to the taste and aroma of essential oils [11]. Essential oils from plants such as lemon grass have been used for a long time in aromatherapy and medicinal applications [4]. There are other compounds that bring about variation in the colour of essential oils from different plants [4]. Most essential oils contain natural monoterpenes and sequiterpenes, with a variety of functional groups that contribute to antifungal and antibacterial properties [12].

The essential oils of similar plants have been reported to have differences in composition depending on the geographical region that the plant is growing [13]. For example, Raina et al. [14] reported that ginger oil composition varied with the geographical origin of the plant. According to Fakim et al. [15], zingiberene was found to vary in quantity from different countries where ginger was growing. In India, zingiberene quantity in the essential oil was 46.2%, 38.12% in China, 29.0% in Nigeria, 20–28% in Australia, 9.5% in Mauritius, 3.6% in Central African Republic, and 1.5% in Srilanka. Different growth stages of the plants also bring about variations in the essential oil composition within the same organ of the plant [16].

There are different methods of essential oil extraction such as steam distillation and low temperature distillation for those compounds that require low temperatures [2] and hydrodistillation and extraction with solvents [17]. The method of extraction determines the quality of essential oil. Inappropriate extraction procedures can lead to damage or change of the chemical nature of the essential oil [4]. Many natural products are thermally unstable and can easily be damaged during thermal extraction [18]. The method of extraction used depends on the kind of compounds present in the oil and the location of the oils within the vegetative structure of the plant species [17].

Steam distillation method has been used widely for commercial extraction of essential oils [19]. However, it is difficult to control the heat transfer throughout the extraction process and the extraction time using steam distillation [4]. In addition, steam distillation extracts up to 93% of the essential oil [20]. In order to increase the content of essential oils extracted, this study utilized a new design of steam distillation developed by Masango [20] that reduces the loss of polar compounds in waste water. The plant material is placed above the water such that it is not in contact with the water, but the steam from heated water passes through it and extracts water-soluble compounds, which are then dissolved in the aqueous fraction at a lower extent [20]. Alternatively, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) is one of the best tools to identify and quantify the constituents of essential oils because of its simplicity, rapidity, accuracy, and efficiency [21]. Consequently, GC-MS has of late been widely used in chromatographic fingerprinting of medicinal plants [2224].

Bioactive compounds present in essential oils have been found to act as biopesticides locally, but they are not adequately utilized by commercial industries. Alternatively, herbal plants that produce essential oils have been utilized as remedies of various problems without knowledge of their quality or chemical composition [25] though with lesser side effects [26]. It is therefore necessary to analyse the composition of the volatile components of essential oils of different plants for the purpose of separating individual compounds that may have different uses in different industries. This study was aimed at extracting essential oils from garlic (Allium sativum), ginger (Zingiber officinale), Mexican marigold (Tagetes minuta), and tick berry (Lantana camara) by steam distillation and analysing their chemical composition using the GC-MS method.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Plant Materials

Fresh tick berry and Mexican marigold leaves were collected from the field at the University of Embu farm in the year 2019, while ginger rhizomes and garlic bulbs were obtained from the local open air market. One kilogram each of tick berry and Mexican marigold leaves were washed under tap water, rinsed in three changes of distilled water, and then air-dried in the laboratory at room temperature (25°C) to evaporate the moisture content. One kilogram each of garlic cloves and ginger rhizomes were also washed with tap water and then rinsed with three changes of distilled water. The test materials were also air-dried in the laboratory and later peeled to remove the outer coverings. All fresh test materials were stored in the laboratory under room temperature awaiting extraction of essential oils.

2.2. Extraction of Essential Oils

Extraction of essential oils was done following a modified procedure described by Adams [27] and adopted by Mugao et al. [28]. Vertical steam distillation unit, consisting of a hot plate, boiling flask, biomass flask, still head, condenser, and receiving flask (separating funnel), was used for dry steam distillation of plant material. The fresh materials of each plant were put separately in the biomass flask, and the distillation unit was switched on. Steam was produced in the boiling flask by heating distilled water with the hot plate. The steam moved upward into the biomass flask where essential oils and other water-soluble plant compounds were moved as vapour through the still head, condensed in the water-cooled condenser, and collected in the receiving flask (separating funnel). The receiving flask separated the heavier-than-water oils from the lighter-than-water oils while allowing excess water-soluble compounds to be drained out and collected separately. The obtained essential oil samples were dried to remove any water molecules by passing them in anhydrous sodium sulphate (Na2SO4) and then stored in sealed vials at 4°C awaiting the GC-MS analysis of the chemical compounds.

2.3. Analysis of the Volatile Components of Essential Oils

Gas chromatograph (GC) Agilent 7890B with autosampler was used to analyse the composition of the volatile components of essential oils extracted from ginger, garlic, tick berry, and Mexican marigold. Mass spectrometry (MS) detector Agilent 5977A was an integral part of the gas chromatograph. The GC-MS records were processed by means of GC-MS ChemStation software. The GC was equipped with a mass selective detector (MSD), an autosampler, and a highly polar DB-wax capillary column (length 30.0 mx; inner diameter 0.25 mmx; inner film thickness 0.25 μm) with 100% polyethylene glycol stationery phase.

The analysis followed the modified procedure described by Omolo et al. [29]. The analysis started after 3.95 minutes (solvent delay). The GC condition had an initial oven temperature of 40°C maintained for 3 minutes. The temperature was then gradually increased with gradients of 10°C/minute up to 60°C, 5°C/minute up to 90°C, and 4°C/minute up to 250°C and maintained there for 8 minutes. Subsequent GC working conditions utilized hydrogen gas with a constant flow of 1 ml/minute as the carrier gas and n-hexane as matrix solvent. The MS working conditions comprised of an ion source and transfer line temperature maintained at 300°C, a regime of injection split in a ratio of 15 : 1, a split flow of 22.5 mL/minute, and a mass range of 20–300 m/z. The injection was done with a 10 μl injection syringe containing 1 μl of injection volume at 250°C injection temperature.

The composition of the essential oils was eluted at different retention times, identified, and obtained by the HES Auto Tune (HES ATUNE.U) by scan. The chromatogram obtained was analysed, and each peak was checked by determining the percent area on the chromatogram, retention time, spectrum, and base peak and then referring to the characteristic mass spectra of compounds listed in the National Institute of standards and Technologies (NIST) using the software of Agilent Topi [30]. Their percentage relative abundances were calculated using

The compounds were then classified into different classes on the basis of presence of heteroatoms or the functional groups of the molecule.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical Classes Identified from Essential Oils

The study identified a total of 52 different chemical classes from the essential oils of the four different plants that were analysed. Their percentage composition was also found to vary between the test plants (Table 1). The essential oils of Mexican marigold constituted the highest composition of the identified chemical classes at 71.2%, followed by ginger at 55.8%, while both tick berry and garlic oils constituted 53.8% of the total classes identified.


S/no.Chemical classPercent compositionAverage
Tick berryMexican marigoldGingerGarlic

1Terpenes37.2620.9442.1839.5734.99
2Ester5.0214.015.84.587.35
3Ketones2.078.938.994.616.15
4Organosulfur5.191.790.0415.015.51
5Alkanes7.550.877.423.204.76
6Cycloalkane7.315.824.990.124.56
7Steroid7.082.012.264.824.04
8Aromatic hydrocarbon0.734.164.376.363.91
9Alkanols5.124.732.510.623.25
10Cycloalkanol4.041.554.132.43
11Alkenols5.730.542.730.592.40
12Carbonates2.121.613.711.86
13Fatty acids3.673.611.82
14Carbaldehyde0.592.410.283.851.78
15Aldehydes4.670.671.31.66
16Alkenes0.125.320.481.48
17Ethers0.072.562.531.29
18Organic acid0.983.520.240.261.25
19Carboxylic acid2.811.120.321.06
20Alkaloids0.093.500.060.91
21Heterocyclic hydrocarbon0.030.432.490.74
22Hydroquinones2.950.74
23Cyclic carboxylic ester (lactone)2.250.56
24Nitrile0.151.810.49
25Furans1.280.090.470.46
26Benzyl carbazate1.670.090.44
27Dione1.710.020.43
28Amide0.930.50.160.40
29Cycloketone (cyclohexanone)1.140.29
30Antihistamine1.120.28
31Thiozole1.050.26
32Polyphenol1.040.26
33Hydroxysteroid0.780.20
34Phthalate0.110.060.510.040.18
35Silane0.60.070.17
36Aromatic hydrocarbon (toluene)0.640.16
37Amine0.030.390.080.13
38Chloroalkyne0.450.11
39Cycloalkenol0.070.260.08
40Thiophene0.330.08
41Aromatic amine (aniline)0.290.07
42Phenanthrenol0.240.06
43Allethrin0.210.05
44Phenol0.170.04
45Corticosteroid0.150.04
46Polycylic aromatic hydrocarbon0.120.03
47Dye0.070.02
48Bithiophene0.070.02
49Pyrrolidinophenone0.040.01
50Morpholine0.040.01
Total compounds found28 (53.8%)37 (71.2%)29 (55.8%)28 (53.8%)

There were 18 major classes that were identified with average percent chemical composition of >1% as shown in Table 1. Terpenes constituted the highest composition in the essential oils of all the tested plants. These results also corroborate with those of Swamy et al. [31] and Matos et al. [32], who reported that terpenes constitute about 50–95% of the essential oils. Dhifi et al. [33] also reported that terpenes constitute the majority of chemical classes in essential oils of various plants. Murugesan et al. [34] also revealed that tick berry essential oils from Tamil Nadu region in India had more terpenes than other compounds. Other major chemical classes identified in this study included esters, ketones, organosulfurs, alkanes, cycloalkanes, steroids, aromatic hydrocarbons, alkanols, cycloalkanols, alkenols, carbonates, fatty acids, carbaldehyde, aldehydes, alkenes, ethers, carboxylic acid, alkaloids, and organic acids listed in order of abundance (Table 1). The listed classes were present in relatively higher abundance either in all or at least three of the tested plants. Dhifi et al. [33] also reported that, apart from terpenes, essential oils also contain various chemical classes including alcohols, ethers, aldehydes, ketones, esters, amines, amides, and phenols.

The percent composition of the different chemical classes in the essential oils of the tested plants was found to vary among the test plants. Ginger essential oil had the highest amount of terpenes (42.18%), followed by garlic (39.57%), tick berry (37.26%), and Mexican marigold (20.94%). Although ginger and garlic, which are majorly spices, were found to contain high levels of terpenes, the compound reportedly contributed less to flavour and fragrance of the essential oils [31, 32]. Mexican marigold had the highest amount of esters (14.01%) and relatively high amount of ketones (8.93%) and alkanols (4.73%). Ginger had the highest composition of ketones (8.99%) and fatty acids (3.67%) and relatively high amount of alkanes (7.42%) and cycloalkanols (4.13%). Garlic recorded the highest composition of organosulfur (15.01%), aromatic hydrocarbons (6.36%), carbonates (3.71%), and carbaldehyde (3.85%). Garlic also had a relatively high amount of fatty acids (3.61%). Tick berry had the highest composition of alkanes (7.55%), cycloalkane (7.31), steroid (7.08%), alkanols (5.12%), alkenols (5.73%), and aldehydes (4.67%) as shown in Table 1. The composition of other minor compounds with average composition of <1% also varied among the test plants and were found to be present in either three, two, or one out of the four plants that were analysed except organic acids and phthalates, which were present in all the plants.

3.2. Specific Compounds Identified from Essential Oils

Further analysis of the identified chemical classes showed that their specific composition varied among the test plants. Table 2 shows the composition of the five major specific compounds in each of the four test plants. This study identified bicyclogermacrene and 3-carene (terpenes), cholesterol (steroid), (1R, 7S, E)-7-Isopropyl-4,10-dimethylenecyclodec-5-enol (alkenol), and bicyclo[5.2.0]nonane,2-methylene-4,8,8-trimethyl-4-vinyl-(cycloalkane) as the major compounds in tick berry (Table 2). Contrary to this observation, the essential oils obtained from the leaves and flowers of tick berry in Cameroon and Madagascar contained curcumene (24.7%), ᵦ-caryophyllene (13.3%), and davanone (15.9%) as the major compounds [35]. The first two are terpenes, while the third one is a ketone. In our study, curcumene was not detected in tick berry, while caryophyllene and davanone were available at relatively low amounts of 0.16% and 0.13%, respectively. Silva et al. [36] also reported that essential oil of tick berry from north Brazil contained limonene, α-phellandrene, germacrene D, and zingiberene as the major compounds. We also identified α-phellandrene and germacrene D in tick berry essential oil but no zingiberene and limonene. Bicyclogermacrene, germacrene D, and β-caryophyllene have been reported as chemical markers of lantana species [37]. However, we found bicyclogermacrene and β-caryophyllene to be present also in the other tested plants, while only 0.20% of germacrene D was detected.


S/no.Chemical classIndividual compoundTick berryMexican marigoldGingerGarlic

1TerpeneBicyclogermacrene5.240.113.490.57
2SteroidCholesterol4.711.973.44
3Terpene3-Carene4.360.392.890.08
4Alkenol(1R,7S,E)-7-Isopropyl-4, 10-dimethylenecyclodec-5-enol3.962.740.60
5CycloalkaneBicyclo[5.2.0]nonane,2-methylene-4,8,8-trimethyl-4-vinyl-3.921.58
6EsterChrysantenyl 2-methuylbutanoate3.07
7AlkaloidPapaveroline, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-3-O-methyl-3.02
8Aromatic hydrocarbon3,5-Dimethylanisole3.01
9Hydroquinonet-Butylhydroquinone2.96
10EsterDodecanoic acid, 1,2,3-propanetriyl ester2.85
11KetoneCorymbolone0.533.590.86
12TerpeneZingiberene3.550.32
13Alkane4,4-Dimethyl octane3.343.210.04
14CycloalkanolCis-2-norbornanol3.08
15OrganosulfurAllyl(Z)-prop-1-enyl trisulfide4.30
16Terpene2-((2R,4aR,8aS)-4a-Methyl-8-methylenedecahydronaphthalen-2-yl)prop-2-en-1-ol0.062.293.93
17CarbaldehydeLongifolenaldehyde0.590.930.213.86
18TerpeneNerolidol0.123.63
19Organosulfur(E)-1-Methyl-2-(prop-1-en-1-yl) disulfane3.40

The major compounds identified in the Mexican marigold essential oil in this study were chrysantenyl 2-methuylbutanoate (3.07%), which is an ester, papaveroline, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-3-O-methyl- (3.02%), which was an alkaloid, 3,5-dimethylanisole (3.01%), which is an aromatic hydrocarbon, t-butylhydroquinone (2.96%), which is a hydroquinone, and dodecanoic acid (2.85%), which is an ester (Table 2). This finding was a departure from the reports of Marotti et al. [38] and Singh et al. [39], who reported that Mexican marigold essential oil obtained from aerial plant parts contained major compounds such as limonene, (Z)-β-ocimene, (E)-β-ocimene dihydrotagetone, (Z)- and (E)-tagetones, and (Z)- and (E)-tagetonones. However, our study also identified (E)- and (Z)-targetones, dihydrotagetone, and (E)- and (Z)-tagetonones in Mexican marigold essential oil but were not the major compounds.

The major compound in ginger essential oil was corymbolone (3.59%) belonging to the family of ketones, followed by zingiberene (3.54%) and bicyclogermacrene (3.49%), which is a terpene. Others were 4,4-dimethyl octane (3.21%), which is an alkane, and cis-2-norbornanol (3.08), which is a cycloalkanol (Table 2). These findings partially corroborate with some earlier reports from other studies and at the same time contradicte other reported findings. For example, zingiberene was reported as the major constituent of ginger oil in India [14] and Mauritius [15]. However, hydro-distilled ginger essential oil from a 10-month-old ginger rhizome cultivated in North east India did not contain any zingiberene [40]. Agrawal et al. [41] found curcumene to be the major constituent of steam-distilled ginger oil in India, while citral was reported as the major constituent of ginger oil in Central Africa Republic [42]. In our study, only 1.13% of α-curcumene and 0.47% of citral was detected in ginger. Zingiberene was also present in garlic though in relatively smaller quantities.

In garlic, the major compound was identified as allyl(Z)-prop-1-enyl trisulfide (4.30%), which is an organosulfur, followed by 2-((2R,4aR,8aS)-4a-methyl-8-methylenedecahydronaphthalen-2-yl)-prop-2-en-1-ol (3.93%), which is a terpene, and longifolenaldehyde (3.86%), which is a carbaldehyde. Others were nerolidol (3.63%), which is a terpene and (E)-1-methyl-2-(prop-1-en-1-yl) disulfane (3.40%), which is an organosulfur (Table 2). These findings did not agree with those of Rao et al. [43] who reported that terpenes were rare in garlic essential oil, and in most cases, only little amounts of monoterpene hydrocarbons such as sabinene and limonene are present. In our study, two terpene compounds were among the major compounds identified in garlic oil, while sabinene and limonene were not detected at all. In fact, our study identified a total of 37 terpenes in garlic making them the most abundant compounds followed by organosulfurs (21) and esters (18). This observation thus contradicted that of Rao et al. [43] and Abu-Lafi et al. [44] who reported that garlic oil had more sulfur compounds than terpenes. The high detection of terpenes in garlic essential oils in our study can be attributed to fresh extraction. Drying of garlic before extraction of essential oil has been reported as one major cause of loss of terpenes from the essential oil [45].

The major organosulfurs that were identified in this study were similar to those identified by other researchers [4549]. They included allyl(Z)-prop-1-enyl-trisulfide (4.30%), (E)-1-methyl-2-(prop-1-en-1-yl) disulfane (3.40%), and diallylsulphide (2.94%) among many others. The organosulfur compounds are said to be antifungal, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anticarcinogenic, antidiabetic, cardioprotective, and neuroprotective [46, 50, 51]. Therefore, garlic is a high value crop with potentially high utility in medical, agrochemical, and food industries. Roberta and Guido [52] also identified E-E farnesal in garlic essential oil, but in our study, this compound was only found in ginger essential oil.

The varying reports of the volatile composition of the same plants from the findings of other previous studies conducted in different countries were attributed to differences in geographical location which affected the agroecological conditions and hence the biochemical composition [37, 53, 54]. Other causes of such diversity may include the nature of chemotypes [55, 56], harvesting stage of the tested plants, plant parts from which the oil is extracted [54, 57, 58], soil type and its nutrient status [37, 57], climatic conditions under which the plants were grown, method of harvesting, and oil extraction method [5961]. The time of the year that the plant material was harvested to extract the oil may also determine the concentration of the essential oil compounds [62, 63]. In addition, the differences in chemical composition of essential oil from the same plant part could be influenced by environmental (climate and soil factors) [64, 65], developmental, and genetic factors [58, 66].

The study further revealed the most common compounds that were present in the essential oils of all the tested plants as shown in Table 3. The majority were terpenes (5), followed by alkanes (2), while carbaldehydes, phthalates, and esters had one compound each that was common in all the four plants. The most abundant terpenes included bicyclogermacrene, 3- careen, and citral, which were most abundant in tick berry (Table 3). The only ester that was found in all the test plants was γ-hexalactone (Table 2). The findings of this study therefore corroborate with earlier reports from other studies that state that terpenes are by far the most dominant constituents of essential oils [6769].


S/no.Chemical classIndividual compoundTick berryMexican marigoldGingerGarlic

1TerpeneBicyclogermacrene5.240.113.490.57
2Terpene3-Carene4.360.392.890.08
3CarbaldehydeLongifolenaldehyde0.590.930.213.86
4TerpeneBicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-one, 1,7,7-trimethyl-, (1S)-0.152.660.141.88
5TerpeneCitral2.721.390.470.11
6TerpeneCaryophyllene0.160.050.640.35
7PhthalateBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate0.120.060.560.05
8AlkaneHexane,3-methyl-4-methylene-0.050.350.040.06
9AlkaneDodecane, 1-fluoro-0.170.230.020.04
10Esterγ-Hexalactone0.050.040.050.05

4. Conclusion and Recommendations

It can be concluded that the chemical composition of the essential oils of ginger, garlic, tick berry, and Mexican marigold has a remarkable variation attributable to the species’ genetic variation and probably the ecological conditions under which these plants are grown. Some of the compounds identified in this study such as terpenes have unutilized potential in biopesticides, pharmaceutical, and food industries. Therefore, industrial extraction and purification of the essential oils in these plants is recommended. The four tested plants were found to have some common chemical compounds and can therefore be exploited for synergistic utility.

Data Availability

Most of the data used to support the findings of this study are included in the article. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded through a scholarship by Higher Education Loans Board (HELB), Kenya.

References

  1. M. Wink, “Plant secondary metabolites modulate insect behavior-steps towards addiction,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 9, no. 364, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. H. Baser, Handbook of Essential Oils: Science, Technology and Applications, University of Wien, Vienna, Austria, 2010, 978-1-4200-6315-8.
  3. R. Rehman, M. A. Hanif, Z. Mushtaq, B. Mochona, and X. Qi, “Biosynthetic factories of essential oils: the aromatic plants,” Natural Products Chemistry and Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 227–227, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  4. B. Adorjan and G. Buchbauer, “Biological properties of essential oils: an updated review,” Flavour and Fragrance Journal, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 407–426, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Alboofetileh, M. Rezaei, H. Hosseini, and M. Abdollahi, “Antimicrobial activity of alginate/clay nanocomposite films enriched with essential oils against three common foodborne pathogens,” Food Control, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. R. Bilia, C. Guccione, B. Isacchi, C. Righeschi, F. Firenzuoli, and M. C. Bergonzi, “Essential oils loaded in nanosystems: a developing strategy for a successful therapeutic approach,” Evidence-Based Complementary Alternative Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 651593, p. 14, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. M. K. Hassan and M. D. Mujtaba, “Antibacterial efficacy of garlic oil nano-emulsion,” AIMS Agriculture and Food, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 194–205, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  8. A. Sarkic and I. Stappen, “Essential oils and their single compounds in cosmetics,” Journal of Cosmetics, vol. 5, no. 11, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. Shakeel, R. Masood, and A. Iram, “Aromatherapy—scope through selected essential oil bearing plants in Jammu and Kashmir (India),” E C Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 5–12, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  10. P. Tongnuanchan and S. Benjakul, “Essential oils: extraction, bioactives and their uses for food preservation,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 79, no. 7, pp. 1231–1249, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. V. A. Parthasarathy, B. Chempakam, and T. J. Zachariah, Chemistry of Spices, CAB International, London, UK, 2008.
  12. S. R. Sridhar, R. V. Rajagopal, R. Rajavel, S. Masilamani, and S. Narasimhan, “Antifungal activity of some essential oils,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 26, pp. 7596–7599, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. N. Z. Sohani, M. Hojjati, and A. A. Barrachina, “Bioactivity of Lantana camara L. essential oil against Callosobruchus maculates (Fabricius),” Chilean Journal of Agriculture Research, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 502–507, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  14. V. K. Raina, A. Kumar, and K. K. Aggarwal, “Essential oil composition of ginger (zingiber officinaleRoscoe) rhizomes from different place in India,” Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 187–191, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. G. Fakim, N. Maudarbaccus, D. Leach, L. Diomo, and H. Wohlmuth, “Essential oil composition of zingiberaceae species from Mauritius,” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 271–273, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  16. M. Shokrpour, G. Abdi, and S. A. Salami, “Essential oil composition at different plant growth development of peppermint (Mentha x piperita L.) under water deficit stress,” Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 431–440, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  17. G. Singh, I. P. S. Kapoor, P. Singh, C. S. De Heluani, M. P. De Lampasona, and C. A. N. Catalan, “Chemistry, antioxidant and antimicrobial investigations on essential oil and oleoresins of Zingiber officinale,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 3295–3302, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Z. Boubechiche, N. E. Chihib, C. Jama, and A. Hellal, “Comparison of volatile compounds profile and antioxidant activity of Allium sativum essential oils extracted using hydro-distillation, ultrasound-assisted and sono-hydrodistillation processes,” Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 281–285, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. E. Cassel and R. M. F. Vargas, “Experiments and modelling of the Cymbopogon winterianus essential oil extraction by steam distillation,” Journal of Mexican Chemical Society, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 126–129, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  20. P. Masango, “Cleaner production of essential oils by steam distillation,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 833–839, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Singariya, K. K. Mourya, and P. Kumar, “Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometric analysis of acetone extract of Cenchrus ciliaris (Dhaman grass),” International Journal of Science and Nature, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 652–661, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  22. F. Gan and R. Ye, “New approach on similarity analysis of chromatographic fingerprint of herbal medicine,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1104, no. 1-2, pp. 100–105, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. Ye, “Application of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in research of traditional Chinese medicine,” Chemical Papers, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 506–511, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. X. Yue, L. Y. Dong, S. Y. Ping, J. Ling, and C. Juan, “Quality control of traditional Chinese medicines,” Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 596–607, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  25. WHO, “General guidelines for methodologies on research and evaluation of traditional medicine,” in WHO Consultation on Methodologies for Research and Evaluation of Traditional Medicine, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China, pp. 1–74, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  26. J. Mariajancyrani, G. Chandramohan, P. Brindha, and P. Saravanan, “GC-MS analysis of terpenes from hexane extract of Lantana camara leaves,” International Journal of Advances in Pharmacy, Biology and Chemistry, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 2277–4688, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  27. R. P. Adams, Identification of Essential Oils Components by Gas Chromatography/Quadruple Mass Spectroscopy, Allured Publishing Corporation, Carol Stream, IL, USA, 4th edition, 2007.
  28. L. G. Mugao, P. W. Muturi, B. M. Gichimu, and E. K. Njoroge, “In-vitro control of Phytophthora infestans and Alternaria solani using crude extracts and essential oils from selected plants,” International Journal of Agronomy, vol. 2020, Article ID 8845692, 10 pages, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. O. Omolo, D. Okinyo, I. O. Ndiege, W. Lwande, and A. Hassanali, “Repellency of essential oils of some Kenyan plants against Anopheles gambiae,” Phytochemistry, vol. 65, no. 20, pp. 2797–2802, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. Topi, “Volatile and chemical compositions of freshly squeezed sweet lime (Citrus limetta) juices,” Journal of Raw Materials to Processed Foods, vol. 1, pp. 22–27, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  31. M. K. Swamy, M. S. Akhtar, and U. R. Sinniah, “Antimicrobial properties of plant essential oils against human pathogens and their mode of action,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2016, Article ID 3012462, p. 21, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. P. Matos, H. F. Teixeira, A. A. De Lima, V. F. Junior, and L. S. Koester, “Essential oils and isolated terpenes in nanosystems designed for topical administration,” Biomolecules Journal, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 138, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  33. W. Dhifi, S. Bellili, S. Jazi, N. Bahloul, and W. Mnif, “Essential oils chemical characterization and investigation of some biological activities,” Medicines, vol. 3, no. 25, p. 16, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. Murugesan, N. Senthilkumar, D. S. Babu, and D. Rajasugunasekar, “Chemical constituents and toxicity assessment of the leaf oil of Lantana camara L from Tamilnadu regions,” Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 32–42, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  35. M. B. Ngassoum, S. Yonkeu, L. Jirovetz, G. Buchbauer, G. Schmaus, and F.-J. Hammerschmidt, “Chemical composition of essential oils ofLantana camara leaves and flowers from Cameroon and Madagascar,” Flavour and Fragrance Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 245–250, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. H. L. Da Silva, E. H. A. Andrade, M. D. G. B. Zoghbi, A. I. R. Luz, J. D. Da Silva, and J. G. S. Maia, “The essential oils of Lantana camara L. occurring in North Brazil,” Flavour and Fragrance Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 208–210, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. Singh, P. Marimuthu, C. S. Heluani, and C. Catalan, “Antimicrobial and antioxidant potentials of essential oil and acetone extract of Myristica fragrans houtt (aril part),” Journal of Food Science, vol. 70, no. 2, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. Marotti, R. Piccaglia, B. Biavati, and I. Marotti, “Characterization and yield evaluation of essential oils from DifferentTagetesSpecies,” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 440–444, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. P. Singh, A. Krishna, V. Kumar et al., “Chemistry and biology of industrial cropTagetes Species: a review,” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. R. K. Sharma, T. C. Sarma, and P. A. Leclereq, “Essential oils of Zingiber officinale roscoe from north east India,” Journal Essential Oil Bearing Plants, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 71–76, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  41. M. Agrawal, S. Walia, S. Dhingra, and B. P. S. Khambay, “Insect growth inhibition, antifeedant and antifungal activity of compounds isolated from Zingiber officinale Roscoe (ginger) rhizomes,” Industrial Pest Management Science, vol. 57, pp. 289–300, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  42. C. Menut, G. Lamaty, J.-M. Bessière, and J. Koudou, “Aromatic plants of tropical central Africa. XIII. Rhizomes volatile components of two zingiberales from the Central African Republic,” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 161–164, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. P. P. Rao, A. Nagender, L. J. Rao, and D. G. Rao, “Studies on the effects of microwave drying and cabinet tray drying on the chemical composition of volatile oils of garlic powders,” European Food Research and Technology, vol. 224, no. 6, pp. 791–795, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. Abu-Lafi, J. W. Dembicki, P. Goldshlag, L. O. Hanuš, and V. M. Dembitsky, “The use of the “Cryogenic” GC/MS and on-column injection for study of organosulfur compounds of the Allium sativum,” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 235–245, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. E. Edris and H. M. Fadel, “Investigation of the volatile aroma components of garlic leaves essential oil. Possibility of utilization to enrich garlic bulb oil,” European Food Research and Technology, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 105–107, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. S. Pyun and S. Shin, “Antifungal effects of the volatile oils from Allium plants against Trichophyton species and synergism of the oils with ketoconazole,” Phytomedicine, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 394–400, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. R. Li, W. C. Chen, W.-P. Wang, W.-Y. Tian, and X.-G. Zhang, “Extraction of essential oils from garlic (Allium sativum) using ligarine as solvent and its immunity activity in gastric cancer rat,” Medicinal Chemistry Research, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1092–1105, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. N. Y. Kim, M. H. Park, E. Y. Jang, and J. Lee, “Volatile distribution in garlic (Allium sativum L.) by solid phase microextraction (SPME) with different processing conditions,” Food Science and Biotechnology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 775–782, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. M. Fukaya, S. Nakamura, H. Hayashida et al., “Structures of cyclic organosulfur compounds from garlic (Allium sativum L.) leaves,” Frontiers in Chemistry, vol. 8, 282 pages, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. W. C. Chen, S.-S. Hsu, C. T. Chou et al., “Effect of diallyl disulfide on Ca2+ movement and viability in PC3 human prostate cancer cells,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 636–643, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. H. Y. Park, N. D. Kim, G. Y. Kim et al., “Inhibitory effects of diallyl disulfide on the production of inflammatory mediators and cytokines in lipopolysaccharide-activated BV2 microglia,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 262, no. 2, pp. 177–184, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. A. Roberta and F. Guido, “Leek or garlic? A chemical evaluation of elephant garlic volatiles,” Molecules, vol. 25, no. 9, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  53. J. C. Chalchat, R.-P. Garry, A. Michet, B. Benjilali, and J. L. Chabart, “Essential oils of rosemary (rosmarinus officinalis L.). The chemical composition of oils of various origins (Morocco, Spain, France),” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 613–618, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. A. Sanli and T. Karadogan, “Geographical impact on essential oil composition of endemic Kundmannia anatolica Hub-Mor (Apiaceae),” African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 131–137, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  55. M. I. Gil, F. A. Tomás-Barberán, B. Hess-Pierce, D. M. Holcroft, and A. A. Kader, “Antioxidant activity of pomegranate juice and its relationship with phenolic composition and processing,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 4581–4589, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. R. A. Golparvar and A. Hadipanah, “Diversity in chemical composition and yield of essential oil from two Mentha species,” Genetika, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 1101–1110, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. Y. Yuan, M. Huang, Y.-X. Pang et al., “Variations in essential oil yield, composition, and antioxidant activity of different plant organs from blumea balsamifera (L.) DC. At different growth times,” Molecules, vol. 21, no. 8, p. 1024, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. A. Muráriková, A. Ťažký, J. Neugebauerová et al., “Characterization of essential oil composition in different basil species and pot cultures by a GC-MS method,” Molecules, vol. 22, no. 7, p. 1221, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. C. Fernandez and E. Ormeno, “Effects of soil nutrient on production and diversity of volatile terpenoids from plants,” Current Bioactive Compounds, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  60. W. Wanzala, Ethnobotanicals for Management of the Brown Ear Tick, Rhipicephalus Appendiculatus in Western Kenya, Printed by Ponsen & Looijen, Wageningen, Netherlands, 1st edition, 2019.
  61. K. Z. Bouassida, M. Trigui, S. Makni, L. Jlaiel, and S. Tounsi, “Seasonal variation in Essential oils composition and the biological and pharmaceutical protective effects of Mentha longifolia leaves grown in Tunisia,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 7856517, 12 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. G. Ozkan, H. Baydar, and S. Erbas, “The influence of harvest time on essential oil composition, phenolic constituents and antioxidant properties of Turkish oregano (Origanum onites L.),” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 205–209, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. K. Malatova, N. Hitimana, T. Niyibizi, J. E. Simon, and H. R. Juliani, “Optimization of harvest regime and post-harvest handling in geranium production to maximize essential oil yield in Rwanda,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 1348–1352, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. J. Blair, T. Aichinger, G. Hackal, K. Hueber, and M. Dachler, “Essential oil content and composition in commercially available dill cultivars in comparison to caraway,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 229–239, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  65. J. B. Cannon, C. L. Cantrell, T. Astatkie, and V. D. Zheljazkov, “Modification of yield and composition of essential oils by distillation time,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 41, pp. 214–220, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. B. Galambosi and P. Peura, “Agrobotanical features and oil content of wild and cultivated forms of caraway (carum carviL.),” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 389–397, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. P. P. Brahmkshatriya and P. S. Brahmkshatriya, “Terpenes: chemistry, biological role, and therapeutic applications,” in Natural Products, K. Ramawat and JM. Mérillon, Eds., pp. 2665–2691, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. F. F. Y. Stephane and B. K. J. Jules, “Terpenoids as important bioactive constituents of essential oils, essential oils,” in Bioactive Compounds, New Perspectives and Applications, M. S. Oliveira, W. A. Costa, and S. G. Silva, Eds., IntechOpen, London, UK, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. S. N. Baharum, H. Bunawan, M. A. A. Ghani, W. A. W. Mustapha, and N. M. Noor, “Analysis of the chemical composition of the essential oil of Polygonum minus Huds. Using two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF MS),” Molecules, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 7006–7015, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Lydia G. Mugao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1822
Downloads556
Citations

Related articles