Pulmonary Artery Catheter (PAC) Accuracy and Efficacy Compared with Flow Probe and Transcutaneous Doppler (USCOM): An Ovine Cardiac Output Validation

<table>Percentage bias and precision for all paired measures for FP versus PAC (−17.2% and 47%), FP versus USCOM (1% and 36.4%), and FP versus cPAC (−0.2% and 54.4%).</table>

Critical Care Research and Practice

fig1

Figure 1

Figure 1: Pulmonary Artery Catheter (PAC) Accuracy and Efficacy Compared with Flow Probe and Transcutaneous Doppler (USCOM): An Ovine Cardiac Output Validation 

Figure 1 | Pulmonary Artery Catheter (PAC) Accuracy and Efficacy Compared with Flow Probe and Transcutaneous Doppler (USCOM): An Ovine Cardiac Output Validation 