Influence of Affordances in the Home Environment on Motor Development of Young Children in Japan

Table 3

Correlations between AHEMD-SR scores and motor experience of parents’ level of physical activity (PA) and number of children in the family.

Subscales	Motor experience of parents		Parents’ level of PA			Number of children in the family
	None	Some	Good	Neither good nor bad	Weak	1 child	2	3 or more
Outside space (OS)	2.9 (0.70)	3.0 (0.78)	3.0 (0.76)	3.0 (0.77)	2.8 (0.79)	2.9 (0.82)	3.1 (0.68)	2.9 (0.77)
Inside space (IS)	2.3 (1.14)	2.45 (1.13)	2.6 (1.18)	2.5 (1.11)	2.2 (1.05)	2.4 (1.13)	2.4 (1.17)	2.7 (1.08)
Variety of stimulation (VS)	3.3 (1.06)	3.6 (0.81)	3.5 (0.90)	3.6 (0.81)	3.5 (0.85)	3.3 (1.02)	3.5 (0.87)	3.8 (0.64)
Fine Motor Toys (FMT)	1.9 (0.87)	2.2 (0.90)	2.3 (0.94)	2.3 (0.88)	1.8 (0.75)	2.0 (0.87)	2.2 (0.84)	2.5 (0.94)
Gross Motor Toys (GMT)	1.5 (0.83)	1.9 (0.88)	1.9 (0.92)	1.9 (0.91)	1.5 (0.65)	1.7 (0.84)	1.7 (0.85)	2.1 (0.97)
Total AHEMD-SR	13.7 (1.46)	14.6 (2.21)	14.9 (2.35)	14.5 (1.99)	13.5 (1.32)	14.0 (2.41)	14.5 (1.80)	15.3 (2.25)