Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Child Development Research
Volume 2014, Article ID 578289, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/578289
Research Article

Comparing Adolescent Only Children with Those Who Have Siblings on Academic Related Outcomes and Psychosocial Adjustment

1Department of Sociology, California State University, San Bernardino, 5500 University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA
2Department of Sociology, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-4423, USA

Received 27 September 2013; Revised 8 December 2013; Accepted 9 December 2013; Published 14 January 2014

Academic Editor: Ross Flom

Copyright © 2014 Zeng-yin Chen and Ruth X. Liu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. “General social survey,” The Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), 2010.
  2. A. Mancillas, “Challenging the stereotypes about only children: a review of the literature and implications for practice,” Journal of Counseling and Development, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 268–275, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Mancillas, “Only children,” in Sibling Development: Implications for Mental Health Practitioners, J. Caspi, Ed., pp. 341–358, Springer, New York, NY, US, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. A. Brill, Psychoanalysis—Its Theories and Practical Applications, Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1922.
  5. N. Fenton, “The only child,” Journal of Genetic Psychology, vol. 35, pp. 546–556, 1928. View at Google Scholar
  6. T. Falbo, “The only-child family in the United States: research issues and results,” Studies in Family Planning, vol. 13, no. 6-7, pp. 212–215, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Falbo, “Only children in the United States and China,” Applied Social Psychology Annual, vol. 7, pp. 159–183, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  8. L. C. Roberts and P. W. Blanton, “‘I always knew mom and dad love me best’: experiences of only children,” Journal of Individual Psychology, vol. 57, pp. 125–140, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  9. V. D. Thompson, “Family size: implicit policies and assumed psychological outcomes,” Journal of Social Issues, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 93–124, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. N. Chow and S. M. Zhao, “The one-child policy and parent-child relationships: a comparison of one-child with multiple-child families in China,” The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, vol. 16, pp. 35–62, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  11. V. A. Fong, Only Hope: Coming of Age under China’s One-Child Policy, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif, USA, 2004.
  12. E. Hall, “China’s only child,” Psychology Today, vol. 19, pp. 44–47, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  13. D. L. Poston and T. Falbo, “Scholastic and personality characteristics of only children and children with siblings in China,” International Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 45–54, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K.-T. Tao, “An overview of only child family mental health in China,” Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, vol. 52, pp. 206–211, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. E. Stewart, “Can knowledge of client birth order bias clinical judgment?” Journal of Counseling and Development, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 167–176, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Falbo, “Only children: an updated review,” Journal of Individual Psychology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 38–49, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  17. T. Falbo and D. F. Polit Jr., “Quantitative review of the only child literature: research evidence and theory development,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 176–189, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. F. Polit and T. Falbo, “Only children and personality development: a quantitative review,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 49, pp. 309–325, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  19. D. F. Polit and T. Falbo, “The intellectual achievement of only children,” Journal of Biosocial Science, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 275–286, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Falbo and D. L. Poston Jr., “The academic, personality, and physical outcomes of only children in China,” Child Development, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 18–35, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. L. Poston and T. Falbo, “Academic performance and personality traits of Chinese children: “Onlies” versus others,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 96, pp. 433–451, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  22. R. X. Liu, W. Lin, and Z.-Y. Chen, “School performance, peer association, psychological and behavioral adjustments: a comparison between Chinese adolescents with and without siblings,” Journal of Adolescence, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 411–417, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Blake, Family Size and Achievement, University of California Press, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, 1989.
  24. D. B. Downey, “Number of siblings and intellectual development: the resource dilution explanation,” American Psychologist, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 497–504, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Jiao, G. Ji, and Q. Jing, “Comparative study of behavioral qualities of only children and sibling children,” Child Development, vol. 57, pp. 357–361, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  26. C. Liu, T. Munakata, and F. N. Onuoha, “Mental health condition of the only-child: a study of urban and rural high school students in China,” Adolescence, vol. 40, no. 160, pp. 831–845, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. S. Weiss, Going It Alone, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 1979.
  28. D. F. Polit, “The only child in single-parent families,” in The Single-Child Family, T. Falbo, Ed., pp. 178–210, Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  29. D. B. Downey and D. J. Condron, “Playing well with others in kindergarten: the benefit of siblings at home,” Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 333–350, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. Bobbitt-Zeher and D. B. Downey, “Number of siblings and friendship nominations among adolescents,” Journal of Family Issues, vol. 34, pp. 1175–1193, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  31. J. J. Arnett, “Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered,” American Psychologist, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 317–326, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. B. Zajonc and G. B. Markus, “Birth order and intellectual development,” Psychological Review, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 74–88, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. B. Zajonc, “The family dynamics of intellectual development,” American Psychologist, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 490–496, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. R. B. Zajonc, “Validating the confluence model,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 457–480, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. B. Zajonc and F. J. Sulloway, “The confluence model: birth order as a within-family or between-family dynamic?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1187–1194, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. Blake, “Family size and the quality of children,” Demography, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 421–442, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. P. M. Blau and O. D. Duncan, The American Occupational Structure, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1967.
  38. D. Featherman and R. Hauser, Opportunity and Change, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1978.
  39. D. B. Downey, “When bigger is not better: family size, parental resources, and children's educational performance,” American Sociological Review, vol. 60, pp. 747–761, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  40. R. Hertwig, J. N. Davis, and F. J. Sulloway, “Parental investment: how an equity motive can produce inequality,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 728–745, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. L. Trivers, “Parent-offspring conflict,” American Zoologist, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 249–264, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. J. Cox and K. S. M. Harter, “Parent-child relationships,” in Well-Being: Positive Development Across the Life Course, M. H. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes, and K. A. Moore, Eds., pp. 191–204, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  43. J. Bowlby, Attachment and Loss, vol. 1, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1982.
  44. J. Bowlby, A Secure Base, Routledge, London, UK, 1988.
  45. M. D. S. Ainsworth, “Attachment: retrospect and prospect,” in The Place of Attachment in Human Behavior, C. M. Parkes and J. Stevenson-Hinde, Eds., Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  46. G. C. Armsden and M. T. Greenberg, “The inventory of parent and peer attachment: individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence,” Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 427–454, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Schachter, The Psychology of Affiliation, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif, USA, 1959.
  48. L. Belmont and F. A. Marolla, “Birth order, family size, and intelligence. A study of a total population of 19 year old men born in the Netherlands is presented,” Science, vol. 182, no. 4117, pp. 1096–1101, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. T. Bjerkedal, P. Kristensen, G. A. Skjeret, and J. I. Brevik, “Intelligence test scores and birth order among young Norwegian men (conscripts) analyzed within and between families,” Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 503–514, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. F. J. Sulloway, “Birth order and intelligence,” Science, vol. 316, no. 5832, pp. 1711–1712, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. R. B. Zajonc, “Family configuration and intelligence,” Science, vol. 192, no. 4236, pp. 227–236, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. R. B. Zajonc and P. R. Mullally, “Birth order: reconciling conflicting effects,” American Psychologist, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 685–699, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. E. B. Page and G. Grandon, “Family configuration and mental ability: two theories contrasted with U.S. data,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 16, pp. 257–272, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  54. J. L. Rodgers, “What causes birth order-intelligence patterns? The admixture hypothesis, revived,” American Psychologist, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 505–510, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. L. Rodgers, “Are birth order effects on intelligence really flynn effects? Reinterpreting belmont and marolla 40 years later,” Intelligence, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. W. Velandia, G. M. Grandon, and E. B. Page, “Family size, birth order, and intelligence in a large South American sample,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 399–416, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. R. B. Zajonc, H. Markus, and G. B. Markus, “The birth order puzzle,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1325–1341, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  58. Z.-Y. Chen, “The relationship between parental constructive behavior and the adolescent’s association with achievement oriented peers: a longitudinal study,” Sociological Inquiry, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 360–381, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. Z.-Y. Chen and S. M. Dornbusch, “Relating aspects of adolescent emotional autonomy to academic achievement and deviant behavior,” Journal of Adolescent Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 293–319, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. L. S. Radloff, “The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population,” Applied Psychological Measurement, vol. 1, pp. 385–401, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  61. L. Strohschein, A. H. Gauthier, R. Campbell, and C. Kleparchuk, “Parenting as a dynamic process: a test of the resource dilution hypothesis,” Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 670–683, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. L. Steinberg, N. S. Mounts, S. D. Lamborn, and S. M. Dornbusch, “Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment across varied ecological niches,” Journal of Research on Adolescence, vol. 1, pp. 19–36, 1991. View at Google Scholar