Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Child Development Research
Volume 2014, Article ID 768186, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/768186
Research Article

The Smart Nonconserver: Preschoolers Detect Their Number Conservation Errors

1CNRS, Unité 8240, LaPsyDÉ, 75005 Paris, France
2Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Unité 8240 LaPsyDÉ, Laboratoire Alfred Binet 46, Rue Saint Jacques, 75005 Paris, France
3Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, Normandie Université, Unité 8240 LaPsyDÉ, Esplanade de la Paix, 14032 Caen, France

Received 16 August 2013; Revised 22 November 2013; Accepted 21 December 2013; Published 12 February 2014

Academic Editor: Andrew N. Meltzoff

Copyright © 2014 Wim De Neys et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Piaget, The Child’s Conception of Number, Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York, NY, USA, 1952.
  2. G. Borst, N. Poirel, A. Pineau, M. Cassotti, and O. Houdé, “Inhibitory control in number-conservation and class-inclusion tasks: a neo-Piagetian inter-task priming study,” Cognitive Development, vol. 27, pp. 283–298, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. O. Houdé, “Rationality in reasoning: the problem of deductive competence and the inhibitory control of cognition,” Current Psychology of Cognition, vol. 16, pp. 108–113, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  4. R. M. Ping and S. Goldin-Meadow, “Hands in the air: using iconic gestures to teach children conservation of quantity,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1277–1287, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. F. Bjorklund and K. K. Harnishfeger, “The resources construct in cognitive development: diverse sources of evidence and a theory of inefficient inhibition,” Developmental Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 48–71, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. N. Dempster and C. J. Brainerd, Interference and Inhibition in Cognition, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1995.
  7. O. Houdé, “Inhibition and cognitive development: object, number, categorization, and reasoning,” Cognitive Development, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 63–73, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. O. Houdé and E. Guichart, “Negative priming effect after inhibition of number/length interference in a Piaget-like task,” Developmental Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 119–123, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Leroux, M. Joliot, S. Dubal, B. Mazoyer, N. Tzourio-Mazoyer, and O. Houdé, “Cognitive inhibition of number/length interference in a Piaget-like task in young adults: evidence from ERPs and fMRI,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 498–509, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Leroux, J. Spiess, L. Zago et al., “Adult brains don't fully overcome biases that lead to incorrect performance during cognitive development: an fMRI study in young adults completing a Piaget-like task,” Developmental Science, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 326–338, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Babai, R. R. Eidelman, and R. Stavy, “Preactivation of inhibitory control mechanisms hinders intuitive reasoning,” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 763–775, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W. De Neys and D. Everaerts, “Developmental trends in everyday conditional reasoning: the retrieval and inhibition interplay,” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 252–263, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. W. De Neys and E. Van Gelder, “Logic and belief across the lifespan: the rise and fall of belief inhibition during syllogistic reasoning,” Developmental Science, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 123–130, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. O. Houdé, “First insights on ‘neuropedagogy of reasoning’,” Thinking & Reasoning, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 81–89, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Moutier, S. Plagne-Cayeux, A.-M. Melot, and O. Houdé, “Syllogistic reasoning and belief-bias inhibition in school children: evidence from a negative priming paradigm,” Developmental Science, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 166–172, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. Poirel, G. Borst, G. Simon et al., “Number conservation is related to children's prefrontal inhibitory control: an fMRI study of a Piagetian task,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, Article ID e40802, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  17. V. F. Reyna, F. J. Lloyd, and C. J. Brainerd, “Memory, development, and rationality: an integrative theory of judgement and decision-making,” in Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research, S. Schneider and J. Shanteau, Eds., pp. 201–245, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Simoneau and H. Markovits, “Reasoning with premises that are not empirically true: evidence for the role of inhibition and retrieval,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 964–975, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. J. Brainerd and V. F. Reyna, “Fuzzy-trace theory: dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience,” in Advances in Child Development and Behavior, H. W. Reese and R. Kail, Eds., vol. 28, pp. 41–100, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. E. Jacobs and P. A. Klaczynski, “The development of judgment and decision making during childhood and adolescence,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 145–149, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. W. De Neys and S. Franssens, “Belief inhibition during thinking: not always winning but at least taking part,” Cognition, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 45–61, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W. De Neys and K. Vanderputte, “When less is not always more: stereotype knowledge and reasoning development,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 432–441, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. A. Klaczynski, J. P. Byrnes, and J. E. Jacobs, “Introduction to the special issue: the development of decision making,” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 225–236, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. E. Stanovich, R. F. West, and M. E. Toplak, “The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models,” Developmental Review, vol. 31, no. 2-3, pp. 103–118, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. W. de Neys, “Bias and conflict: a case for logical intuitions,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 28–38, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. W. De Neys, “Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: some clarifications,” Thinking & Reasoning, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. T. Proulx, M. Inzlicht, and E. Harmon-Jones, “Understanding all inconsistency compensation as a palliative response to violated expectations,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 285–291, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. O. Houde, L. Zago, E. Mellet et al., “Shifting from the perceptual brain to the logical brain: the neural impact of cognitive inhibition training,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 721–728, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. Moutier, “Deductive reasoning and experimental matching-bias inhibition training in school children,” Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 429–452, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Moutier, N. Angeard, and O. Houdé, “Deductive reasoning and matching-bias inhibition training: evidence from a debiasing paradigm,” Thinking & Reasoning, vol. 8, pp. 205–224, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  31. S. Moutier and O. Houdé, “Judgement under uncertainty and conjunction fallacy inhibition training,” Thinking & Reasoning, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 185–201, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. O. Houdé, A. Pineau, G. Leroux et al., “Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of Piaget's conservation-of-number task in preschool and school-age children: a neo-Piagetian approach,” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 332–346, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. W. De Neys and T. Glumicic, “Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking,” Cognition, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 1248–1299, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. St. B. T. Evans and D. E. Over, Rationality and Reasoning, Psychology Press, Hove, UK, 1996.
  35. J. S. B. T. Evans, “Intuition and reasoning: a dual-process perspective,” Psychological Inquiry, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 313–326, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “On the psychology of prediction,” Psychological Review, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 237–251, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. Bonner and B. R. Newell, “In conflict with ourselves? An investigation of heuristic and analytic processes in decision making,” Memory & Cognition, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 186–196, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. W. De Neys and J. F. Bonnefon, “The whys and whens of individual differences in thinking biases,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 17, pp. 172–178, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  39. W. De Neys, E. Moyens, and D. Vansteenwegen, “Feeling we're biased: autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict,” Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 208–216, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. W. De Neys, S. Rossi, and O. Houdé, “Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: cognitive misers are no happy fools,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 20, pp. 269–273, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  41. K. Morsanyi and S. J. Handley, “Logic feels so good-I like it! Evidence for intuitive detection of logicality in syllogistic reasoning,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 596–616, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  42. E. J. N. Stupple and L. J. Ball, “Belief-logic conflict resolution in syllogistic reasoning: inspection-time evidence for a parallel-process model,” Thinking & Reasoning, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 168–181, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. W. de Neys, S. Cromheeke, and M. Osman, “Biased but in doubt: conflict and decision confidence,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID e15954, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. W. De Neys and V. Feremans, “Development of heuristic bias detection in elementary school,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 49, pp. 258–269, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  45. P. L. Davies, S. J. Segalowitz, and W. J. Gavin, “Development of response-monitoring ERPs in 7- to 25-year-olds,” Developmental Neuropsychology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 355–376, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. W. De Neys, O. Vartanian, and V. Goel, “Smarter than we think: when our brains detect that we are biased,” Psychological Science, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 483–489, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. K. D. Fitzgerald, S. C. Perkins, M. Angstadt et al., “The development of performance-monitoring function in the posterior medial frontal cortex,” NeuroImage, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 3463–3473, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. D. L. Santesso and S. J. Segalowitz, “Developmental differences in error-related ERPs in middle- to late-adolescent males,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 205–217, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. K. E. Lyons and S. Ghetti, “The development of uncertainty monitoring in early childhood,” Child Development, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 1778–1787, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus