Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Child Development Research
Volume 2015, Article ID 636929, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/636929
Research Article

Perceptions of Popularity-Related Behaviors in the Cyber Context: Relations to Cyber Social Behaviors

Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic

Received 31 July 2015; Accepted 23 November 2015

Academic Editor: Elena Nicoladis

Copyright © 2015 Michelle F. Wright. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Sevcikova and D. Šmahel, “Online harassment and cyberbullying in the Czech Republic: comparison across age groups,” Journal of Psychology, vol. 217, no. 4, pp. 227–229, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. D. Coie, K. A. Dodge, and H. Coppotelli, “Dimensions and types of social status: a cross-age perspective,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 557–570, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. M. LaFontana and A. H. N. Cillessen, “Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 635–647, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. H. N. Cillessen and L. Mayeux, “From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status,” Child Development, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 147–163, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Eder, “The cycle of popularity: interpersonal relations among female adolescents,” Sociology of Education, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 154–165, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. F. Wright, “The role of the media and the cyber context in adolescents' popularity,” in Living in the Digital Age: Self-Presentation, Networking, Playing, and Participation in Politics, P. Lorentz, D. Smahel, M. Metykova, and M. F. Wright, Eds., Muni Press, Brno, Czech Republic, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. F. Wright, “Longitudinal investigation of the associations between adolescents' popularity and cyber social behaviors,” Journal of School Violence, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 291–314, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. R. Crick and J. K. Grotpeter, “Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment,” Child Development, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 710–722, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. J. Prinstein and A. H. N. Cillessen, “Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status,” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 310–342, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Lenhart, Teens, social media & technology: overview 2015, http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/.
  11. D. Smahel, M. F. Wright, and M. Cernikova, “Classification of online problematic situations in the context of youths' development,” Communications, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 233–260, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Xie, Y. Li, S. M. Boucher, B. C. Hutchins, and B. D. Cairns, “What makes a girl (or a boy) popular (or unpopular)? African American children's perceptions and developmental differences,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 599–612, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. L. Schoffstall and R. Cohen, “Cyber aggression: the relation between online offenders and offline social competence,” Social Development, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 587–604, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. P. Ang and D. H. Goh, “Cyberbullying among adolescents: the role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender,” Child Psychiatry and Human Development, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 387–397, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Bauman, R. B. Toomey, and J. L. Walker, “Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students,” Journal of Adolescence, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 341–350, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. Gradinger, D. Strohmeier, and C. Spiel, “Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: identification of risk groups for adjustment problems,” Journal of Psychology, vol. 217, no. 4, pp. 205–213, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. F. Wright and Y. Li, “The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: the moderating effect of peer rejection,” Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 662–674, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. Eisenberg and P. A. Miller, “The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 91–119, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. F. Wright, Y. Li, and J. Shi, “Chinese adolescents' social status goals: associations with behaviors and attributions for relational aggression,” Youth and Society, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 566–588, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. T. Parkhurst and A. Hopmeyer, “Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: two distinct dimensions of peer status,” Journal of Early Adolescence, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 125–144, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Adler and P. Adler, Peer Power: Preadolescent Culture and Identity, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 1998.