Research Article
Comparison between Cardiac CTA and Echocardiography for Assessment of Ventricular Septal Rupture Diameter and Its Effect on Transcatheter Closure
Table 3
Comparison of endpoint indicators between the echocardiography group and CTA group.
| Items | Echocardiography group () | CTA group () | value |
| Primary endpoint indicators | 12 (54.5) | 8 (36.4) | 0.226 | Closure failure ( (%)) | 2 (9.1) | 0 | 0.148 | Occluder displacement ( (%)) | 3 (13.6) | 1 (4.5) | 0.294 | Poor occluder molding ( (%)) | 7 (31.8) | 7 (31.8) | 1.000 | CROWD | | | 0.546 | Secondary endpoint indicators | 14 (63.6) | 8 (36.4) | 0.070 | 30 d all-cause mortality ( (%)) | 8 (36.4) | 5 (22.7) | 0.322 | Significant residual shunt ( (%)) | 8 (36.4) | 3 (13.6) | 0.082 | Residual shunt (mm) | 4.2 (3.1, 5.9) | 2.05 (0, 4.0) | 0.005 | Valvular injury ( (%)) | 4 (18.2) | 2 (9.1) | 0.380 | Reoperation ( (%)) | 2 (9.1) | 0 | 0.148 | MACE ( (%)) | 1 (4.5) | 1 (4.5) | 1.000 | Vascular injury ( (%)) | 1 (4.5) | 0 | 0.312 | 30 d all-cause mortality combined with procedural complications ( (%)) | 5 (22.7) | 3 (13.6) | 0.434 |
|
|
Note: MACE: major adverse cardiovascular events.
|