Statin Eligibility according to 2013 ACC/AHA and USPSTF Guidelines among Jordanian Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Impact of Gender

Ibdah, Rashid; Alrawashdeh, Ahmad; Rawashdeh, Sukaina; Melhem, Nebras Y.; Hammoudeh, Ayman J.; Jarrah, Mohamad I.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5561518

Cardiovascular Therapeutics

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Discussion Limitations Conclusions Data Availability Additional Points Ethical Approval Consent Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 5561518 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5561518

Statin Eligibility according to 2013 ACC/AHA and USPSTF Guidelines among Jordanian Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Impact of Gender

Rashid Ibdah,¹Ahmad Alrawashdeh,²Sukaina Rawashdeh,¹Nebras Y. Melhem,³Ayman J. Hammoudeh,⁴and Mohamad I. Jarrah¹

Academic Editor: Baohui Xu

Received13 Feb 2023

Revised30 May 2023

Accepted31 May 2023

Published05 Jun 2023

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate statin eligibility among Middle Eastern patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who had no prior use of statin therapy, according to 2013 ACC/AHA and 2016 USPSTF guidelines, and to compare statin eligibility between men and women. This was a retrospective multicenter observational study of all adult patients admitted to five tertiary care centers in Jordan with a first-time AMI, no prior cardiovascular disease, and no prior statin use between April 2018 and June 2019. Ten-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score was estimated based on ACC/AHA risk score. A total of 774 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 55 years (), 120 (15.5%) were women, and 688 (88.9%) had at least one risk factor of cardiovascular disease. Compared to men, women were more likely to be older; had a history of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia; and had higher body mass index, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoproteins. Compared to women, men were more likely to have a higher 10-year ASCVD risk score (14.0% vs. 17.8%, ), and more men had a 10-year ASCVD risk score of ≥7.5% and ≥10%. The proportion of patients eligible for statin therapy was 80.2% based on the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines and 59.5% based on the USPSTF guidelines. A higher proportion of men were eligible for statin therapy compared to women, based on both the 2013 ACC/AHA (81.4% vs. 73.5%, ) and USPSTF guidelines (62.0% vs. 45.2%, ). Among Middle Easterners, over half of patients with AMI would have been eligible for statin therapy prior to admission based on the 2013 ACC/AHA and USPSTF guidelines, with the presence of gender gap. Adopting these guidelines in clinical practice might positively impact primary cardiovascular preventive strategies in this region.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain among the leading causes of death worldwide, accounting for over 30% of global deaths in 2019 [1, 2]. The use of statins has reduced the mortality and morbidity associated with CVDs worldwide [3]. However, underprescription of statins is a serious issue in the Middle East. For example, statins were recently reported as the most underprescribed medications among older Lebanese patients [4]. Further studies are essential to understand the eligibility of statin therapy in the region, particularly among patients with CVDs.

Cholesterol-lowering drugs, statins, are the first-choice treatments for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) [5]. The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) released a list of guidelines in 2013 and 2019 that define the doses and eligibility for statin treatment to manage CVD risk in adults. The guidelines identify high- and moderate-intensity statin therapy for use in primary and secondary prevention [6, 7]. In 2016, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released recommendations on statin therapy for the primary prevention of ASCVD [8]. According to these guidelines, individuals aged 40 to 75 years and with one or more ASCVD risk factors (hypertension, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus (DM), or dyslipidaemia) and a ten-year ASCVD are advised to start statin therapy. The AHA/ACC and USPSTF guidelines differ in grading and assigning levels of evidence and classes of recommendations at a population level [9].

Lipid-lowering therapies are essential for the primary and secondary prevention of ASCVD [10]. Statin therapy in patients aged more than 65 years old decreases the risk of major cardiovascular events by 19% [11]. However, statin underprescription is a widespread issue, specifically among older populations [12–15]. Furthermore, prescription of statins has been shown to be affected by gender discrepancies [16, 17]. Information is scarce concerning what clinical practice has been established among patients with CVDs in regard to statin therapy in Jordan. Therefore, the present study is aimed at evaluating statin eligibility based on the 2013 ACC/AHA and USPSTF 2016 guidelines for the treatment of blood cholesterol in a cohort of adults who experienced first-time acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to investigate potential gender impact in statin eligibility.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Setting

This was a retrospective multicenter study involving all patients presented with a first-time AMI with no prior statin use, across five tertiary care centers in Jordan between April 2018 and June 2019. The ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the King Abdullah University Hospital (IRB no. 53/114/2018). Ethical approval was obtained from all participating hospitals. This study was conducted in compliance with the ethical standards per Helsinki Declaration. The included patients agreed to participate and provided written informed consent with a cover letter containing a description of the study, the participant’s ethical and legal rights, and the researcher’s contact information which were provided for each participant. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) cross-sectional reporting guidelines were used in our study [18].

2.2. Study Participants and Data Collection

The included patients were screened and enrolled to the study by trained medical students who received training for the inclusion criteria and data collection. To be enrolled in this study, patients must present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) for first time with no prior cardiovascular diseases and with no present or past use of statin. All participants were confirmed to have had their lipid profile measured upon admission. Patients with prior statin use and those without lipid profile data were excluded from the study.

The data regarding lipid profile, blood pressure, body mass index, and electrocardiography (ECG) were collected upon hospital admission. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight/height² (kg/m²). The remaining parameters were collected from the patients’ medical records upon admission. In addition, other demographic and risk factors included age and gender, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, and family history of cardiovascular diseases, which were collected during the interview at admission. The diagnosis of AMI was confirmed by the cardiologist in each participating hospital. During the enrolment period, no further medical complications were detected among the participants. Blood samples were taken for lipid and glucose analysis. Each patient was monitored carefully during the procedure by medical residents.

Ten-year ASCVD risk was estimated based on ACC/AHA risk score (2013) for the majority of the patients (84.9%) [19]. The ASCVD risk score for a total of 117 patients could not be estimated because the value of the parameters included in the ACC/AHA equation was not within the allowed range (i.e., age (20-79), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (90-130), total cholesterol (TC) (130-320), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (20-100)). To manage missing value for those patients, we estimated the 10-year ASCVD risk score using the Framingham 2008 formula [20]. However, the 10-year ASCVD risk score eventually could not be estimated for a total of 17 patients, for the same reason above. The 10-year ASCVD risk scores were estimated using the CV risk R package [21]. The 2013 ACC/AHA and 2016 USPSTF guidelines were used to identify statin eligibility.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

For descriptive analysis, continuous data were presented as means and standard deviations (SDs) or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR), and categorical variables were presented as frequency and percentages (%). Percentages were compared between both genders using chi-square test, while means or medians were compared using the Student -test or Mann–Whitney test as appropriate. Binary logistic regression was used to estimate the association between statin eligibility for both the 2013 ACC/AHA and USPSTF guidelines and gender, without adjusting for other factors. The association was presented as unadjusted odds ratio (OR). A value of <0.050 was considered as statistically significant. All assumptions of statistical procedures were assured and met. Data analysis was performed using Stata software package (Stata Corp 16).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Study Participants

Of 774 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 548 (70.8%) had STEMI and 226 (29.2%) had NSTEMI. The mean age was 55 years (), and 120 (15.5%) were women and 292 (37.7%) had DM. Almost 89% () had at least one risk factor of CVDs and 61.2% () were active smokers.

Participants’ characteristics and the association between demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population and gender are presented in Table 1. Compared to men, women were older and were more likely to have a history of DM, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia, but less likely to be smokers (). Women had a higher level of BMI, SBP, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), TC, and HDL-C (). Although there was no statistical difference in the type of AMI between men and women, women were less likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and more likely to receive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

3.2. The 10-Year ASCVD Risk Score

The description of the 10-year ASCVD risk score for our sample is presented in Table 2. The mean 10-year ASCVD risk score of the total population was 17.2% (). Men had higher mean 10-year ASCVD risk score compared to women ( vs. 13.9, ). In addition, compared to women, men were more likely to have a 10-year ASCVD risk score of ≥7.5% (54.7% vs. 78.1%, ) and a 10-year ASCVD risk score of ≥10% (47.8% vs. 67.9%, ).

3.3. Statin Eligibility and Gender Gap

Table 3 shows the proportion of total patients and both genders who were eligible for statin therapy by both the 2013 ACC/AHA and USPSTF guidelines as well as the results of univariable logistic regression for both genders. According to the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines for statin eligibility, a total of 610 (80.1%) patients were eligible for statin therapy. Compared to women, there was weak evidence that men were more likely (73.5% vs. 81.3%, ) and had higher odds (; 95% CI 1.00-2.48) to be eligible for statin therapy. However, women were more likely and had higher odds (; 95% CI 1.38-3.06) to be eligible for statin based on the second category (DM patients aged 40-75 with LDL-C ranged between 70 and 189), while men were more likely and had higher odds (; 95% CI 1.96-4.47) to be eligible for statin therapy based on the third category (10-year ASCVD ) of the 2013 ACC/AHA guideline.

According to the USPSTF guideline, a total of 450 (59.4%) patients were eligible for statin therapy. Compared to women, men were more likely (45.2% vs. 61.9%, , respectively) and had higher odds (; 95% CI 1.32-2.95) to be eligible for statin therapy. The only category of the USPSTF guideline that showed significant difference between men and women was the 10-year ASCVD risk score of ≥10%.

4. Discussion

In the present multicenter study, we evaluated the statin eligibility based on the 2013 ACC/AHA and USPSTF 2016 guidelines in a cohort of adults who experienced a first-time AMI in a patient cohort in Jordan. Our findings indicated that 60% to 80% of our patients were eligible for statin therapy. Compared to the USPSTF guidelines, the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines identified more eligible patients by 35%. In addition, compared to women, men were more likely to have a higher eligibility for statin therapy based on both the 2013 ACC/AHA and USPSTF guidelines.

A total of 774 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 55 years (), 120 (15.5%) were women, and 688 (88.9%) had at least one risk factor of cardiovascular disease. Compared to men, women were more likely to be older; had a history of DM, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia; and had a higher level of BMI, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoproteins. Compared to women, men were more likely to have a higher 10-year ASCVD risk score (45.2% vs. 62.0%, ), and more men had a 10-year ASCVD risk score of ≥7.5% and ≥10%. The proportion of patients who were eligible for statin therapy was 80.2% based on the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines and 59.5% based on the USPSTF guidelines. A higher proportion of men were eligible for statin therapy compared to women, based on both the 2013 ACC/AHA and USPSTF guidelines.

However, we observed that more women were eligible for statin therapy based on the second category of AHA guidelines than men. This is likely associated with the higher likelihood of women to be older and diabetic among the population. Specifically, women displayed elevated body mass index (BMI), blood pressure levels, LDL-C, and hypercholesterolemia. Consistent with our findings, previous studies have reported similar associations. Numerous clinical trials have consistently revealed that female patients diagnosed with AMI tend to be of advanced age and exhibit higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and other associated complications [22–26]. These findings are of significant importance, as they elucidate a constellation of factors that contribute to the increased susceptibility of this population to DM.

In 2013, the ACC/AHA framed certain guidelines on the management of the major risk factor for ASCVD, i.e., blood cholesterol levels, to reduce the risks for ASCVD in the adult population. These recommendations were based on the random clinical trials (RCTs) and applied to both males and females [27]. Reaching a target cholesterol level is not a part of the updated guidelines. The updated guidelines recommend an appropriate dose of statin for primary prevention that is based on an individual’s ASCVD risk scores, or comorbidities like diabetes or elevated blood LDL-C levels. These guidelines advocate the use of statin therapy and are not based on achieving LDL-C targets; rather, they emphasize on LDL-C lowering [28].

It is reported that the USPSTF statin guidelines resulted in a 15% decrease in statin eligibility when compared to the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines in the atherosclerosis patients who were not on statin therapy [29]. Consistent with these findings in the present study also, we observed a significantly higher number of patients ineligible for statin therapy according to the USPSTF guidelines as compared to the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines. Patients found ineligible by the USPSTF had a higher ASCVD risk as compared to those found ineligible by the ACC/AHA. These findings highlight the fact that the health care providers or clinicians should wisely choose the guidelines to determine the eligibility of the patients for statin therapy that may impact the ASCVD outcomes.

In a study comprising of 4854 people, 66% of women were found to be eligible for statin therapy as per the ACC/AHA guidelines. This study also reported the overestimation of ASCVD risk [30]. In the present study, we also found the majority of men to be statin eligible as per the ACC/AHA and USPSTF guidelines. In another multiethnic study, a 28% increase in statin eligibility was observed by the ACC/AHA guidelines compared with the ATP-III guidelines [31].

The prevalence of morbidity and mortality after first MI is more prevalent in women compared to men [32]. Among the survivors of MI, the risk of recurrence of MI and heart failure is more in women as compared to men [33]. It is reported that the one-year mortality post-MI was 44% in women as compared to 27% in men. The short-term and long-term mortality post-MI is reported to be about 40% higher in women as compared to men [34]. Regardless of a higher risk of MI and higher morbidity and mortality in women, only half of the women as compared to men are treated with thrombolytic therapies. The mortality due to MI was found to be double in women less than 50 years as compared to men in the same age group [35].

It has been seen in CVD cases that men receive more frequent treatment as compared to women. The poor prognosis in women, as evident from several clinical studies, may be due to the fact that CVDs occur lately in women as compared to men (approximately 7-10 years). According to the USAGE study [36], women are also at a higher risk of statin noncompliance than men and are more likely to stop or switch their statin therapy because of side effects than men. Another explanation for the poor prognosis in women may be the prevalence of other comorbidities such as diabetes and chronic kidney diseases. These facts together complicate the process of the management of CVDs in women [37]. Consistent with these findings, in the present study, also, we observed that a significantly higher proportion of women was eligible for statin therapy as compared to the men. Undertreatment of women in primary and secondary prevention of CVDs may be influenced by the misconception of CVDs as a predominantly male problem [38]. Furthermore, this disparity may be related to ill-defined risk stratification or underutilization of guidelines in women compared to men.

However, according to the ASCVD risk based on the 2013 ACC/AHA and 2016 USPSTF guidelines, men were more likely to be eligible for statin therapy. It is documented that there is a strong relationship between prevalence of CVD risk factors and lifestyle. Smoking, for example, increases the risk of developing ASCVD [39]. Our findings may be corroborated by the staggeringly high rate of Jordanian male smokers (54.9%) compared to females (8.3%) [40].

It is documented that statins are equally effective in men and women [41, 42]. In a meta-analysis that analysed the effect of all lipid-lowering therapies from 1996 to 2003, it was concluded that statins significantly reduced CVD events, mortality, and MI in women [43]. However, it is difficult to confirm the effectiveness of statin therapy in women with CVDs because of the fact that most of the studies related to statin therapy have included very few women. Studies that included more women did not provide results by gender classification; rather, they provide conclusions based on the primary outcomes in general. Another study showed that statins reduced the risk of CVD events in both men and women. However, it was concluded that women on statin therapy might not have reductions in mortality and stroke like their male counterparts [44]. In a meta-analysis that included 11,435 women, it was observed that statin therapy did not show any better outcome in terms of CVD events and mortality as compared to placebo [43]. These observations warrant more studies, including a higher number of women with CVD events to confirm the gender-specific statin response in managing CVDs.

The primary reason for the underprescription of statins in elderly coronary patients is the perceived lack of indication, which stresses the need of extensive guidelines for prescription in elderly patients. Despite recommendations issued in international and national guidelines, the use of lipid-lowering medications in Jordan remains suboptimal.

5. Limitations

The results of this study should be interpreted with caution. First, this was a cross-sectional descriptive design which may limit the external validity of the results. Second, selection bias is potential as the results were generated on patients who had first-time AMI. Thus, the results may not be generalized to the total population of the Middle East. A larger study with more comprehensive inclusion criteria and using experimental longitudinal design may be necessary to further understand the eligibility of statin therapy among Middle Easterners. Also, the impact of confounders has not been assessed as we have not adjusted for other factors when estimating the odds ratio. However, most factors have been involved in estimating the 10-year ASCVD risk. Finally, the application of the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines might be outdated, and future studies should consider the application of the 2019 ACC/AHA guidelines.

6. Conclusions

In this Middle Eastern study of patients with first-time AMI, evaluation for statin eligibility based on the 2013 ACC/AHA and USPSTF guidelines showed that a major proportion of individuals would have been eligible for statin therapy prior to presentation. We observed a gender impact in the statin eligibility in the study cohort. Men were more likely and had higher odds to be eligible for statin therapy as compared to women. Adopting these guidelines in clinical practice might positively impact primary cardiovascular preventive strategies in this region.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the first or corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional Points

Data Sharing Statement. Data might be shared after a formal approval from the participating hospitals.

Ethical Approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of King Abdullah University Hospital (protocol code 53/114/2018).

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

RI, SR, and MJ conceived the idea. RI, SR, AH, and MJ collected the data. AA analysed the data. RI, AA, and NM wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and edited the manuscript and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

References

G. A. Roth, G. A. Mensah, and V. Fuster, “The global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risks,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 76, no. 25, pp. 2980-2981, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. A. Mensah, G. A. Roth, and V. Fuster, “The global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 74, no. 20, pp. 2529–2532, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Rodriguez, D. J. Maron, J. W. Knowles, S. S. Virani, S. Lin, and P. A. Heidenreich, “Association of statin adherence with mortality in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease,” JAMA Cardiology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 206–213, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Hanna, B. Chahine, and S. F. Al, “Under-prescription of medications in older adults according to START criteria: a cross-sectional study in Lebanon,” Health science Reports, vol. 5, no. 5, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Kazi, J. M. Penko, and K. Bibbins-Domingo, “Statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: review of evidence and recommendations for clinical practice,” The Medical Clinics of North America, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 689–699, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Arnett, R. S. Blumenthal, M. A. Albert et al., “2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines,” Circulation, vol. 140, no. 11, pp. e596–e646, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Arnett, R. S. Blumenthal, M. A. Albert et al., “2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 1376–1414, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Chou, T. Dana, I. Blazina, M. Daeges, and T. L. Jeanne, “Statins for prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 316, no. 19, pp. 2008–2024, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Pavlović, P. Greenland, O. H. Franco et al., “Recommendations and associated levels of evidence for statin use in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a comparison at population level of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Multisociety, US Preventive Services Task Force, Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense, Canadian Cardiovascular Society, and European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society clinical practice guidelines,” Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, vol. 14, no. 9, article e007183, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Grundy, N. J. Stone, A. L. Bailey et al., “2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines,” Circulation, vol. 139, no. 25, pp. e1082–e1143, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. N. Horodinschi, A. M. A. Stanescu, O. G. Bratu, A. Pantea Stoian, D. G. Radavoi, and C. C. Diaconu, “Treatment with Statins in Elderly Patients,” Medicina, vol. 55, no. 11, p. 721, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Dalal, L. P. Low, D. Van Phuoc et al., “The use of medications in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease in the Asian region,” Current Medical Research and Opinion, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 423–433, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. A. Suero-Abreu, A. Karatasakis, S. Rashid et al., “Factors Associated with Disparities in Appropriate Statin Therapy in an Outpatient Inner City Population,” Healthcare, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 361, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Soudet, L. Bultel, L. Adnane, T. Reix, and M. A. Sevestre, “Under-prescription of medical treatment for peripheral artery disease in the under 50s: a retrospective study,” Angiology, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 338–343, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Cournot, J. P. Cambou, S. Quentzel, and N. Danchin, “Key factors associated with the under-prescription of statins in elderly coronary heart disease patients: results from the ELIAGE and ELICOEUR surveys,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Baharudin, A. M. Ahmad Roslan, M. S. Mohamed Yassin et al., “Gender disparity in the prescription of secondary prevention medications in a Malaysian primary care clinic,” Malaysian Family Physician, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 37–44, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wallach-Kildemoes, H. Stovring, E. Holme Hansen, K. Howse, and H. Pétursson, “Statin prescribing according to gender, age and indication: what about the benefit–risk balance?” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 235–246, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. von Elm, D. G. Altman, M. Egger, S. J. Pocock, P. C. Gøtzsche, and J. P. Vandenbroucke, “The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1495–1499, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Andrus and D. Lacaille, “2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 63, no. 25, p. 2886, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. B. D'Agostino Sr., R. S. Vasan, M. J. Pencina et al., “General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary Care,” Circulation, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 743–753, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Zdrenghea, G. Guşetu, M. Zdrenghea et al., “CV RISK - a new relative cardiovascular risk score,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 132, article 109362, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. De Luca, G. Parodi, R. Sciagrà et al., “Relation of gender to infarct size in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 111, no. 7, pp. 936–940, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. Jackson, M. Moscucci, D. E. Smith et al., “The association of sex with outcomes among patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction in the contemporary era: insights from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2),” American Heart Journal, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 106–12.e1, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. De Luca, H. Suryapranata, J. H. Dambrink et al., “Sex-related differences in outcome after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty: data from the Zwolle myocardial infarction study,” American Heart Journal, vol. 148, no. 5, pp. 852–856, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Bhan, W. J. Cantor, R. T. Yan et al., “Efficacy of early invasive management post-fibrinolysis in men versus women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a subgroup analysis from trial of routine angioplasty and stenting after fibrinolysis to enhance reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction (TRANSFER-AMI),” American Heart Journal, vol. 164, no. 3, pp. 343–350, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. I. Jarrah, M. J. Ababneh, L. I. Tawalbeh, A. J. Hammoudeh, H. M. Barukba, and A. Othman, “Statin eligibility based on the ACC/AHA guidelines among Middle Eastern patients with diabetes mellitus presenting with acute myocardial infarction,” Annals of Medicine and Surgery, vol. 61, pp. 148–154, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Goff Jr., D. M. Lloyd-Jones, G. Bennett et al., “2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines,” Circulation, vol. 129, Supplement 2, no. 25, pp. S49–S73, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gulati and C. N. Merz, “New cholesterol guidelines and primary prevention in women,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 84–94, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Miedema, Z. A. Dardari, S. Kianoush et al., “Statin eligibility, coronary artery calcium, and subsequent cardiovascular events according to the 2016 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) statin guidelines: MESA (multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis),” Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 7, no. 12, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kavousi, M. J. Leening, D. Nanchen et al., “Comparison of application of the ACC/AHA guidelines, Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines, and European Society of Cardiology guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in a European cohort,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 311, no. 14, pp. 1416–1423, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Paixao, C. R. Ayers, J. D. Berry, J. A. de Lemos, and A. Khera, “Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention: a comparison between the third adult treatment panel and the new 2013 treatment of blood cholesterol guidelines,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 778-779, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. M. Bucholz, N. M. Butala, S. S. Rathore, R. P. Dreyer, A. J. Lansky, and H. M. Krumholz, “Sex differences in long-term mortality after myocardial infarction: a systematic review,” Circulation, vol. 130, no. 9, pp. 757–767, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Y. Khamis, T. Ammari, and G. W. Mikhail, “Gender differences in coronary heart disease,” Heart, vol. 102, no. 14, pp. 1142–1149, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Kurrelmeyer, “Cardiovascular disease in women,” Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 183-184, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. T. Nauta, J. W. Deckers, K. M. Akkerhuis, and R. T. van Domburg, “Short- and long-term mortality after myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes: changes from 1985 to 2008,” Diabetes Care, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 2043–2047, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. G. Karalis, R. A. Wild, K. C. Maki et al., “Gender differences in side effects and attitudes regarding statin use in the understanding statin use in America and gaps in patient education (USAGE) study,” Journal of Clinical Lipidology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 833–841, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Pathak, S. Shirodkar, R. Ruparelia, and J. Rajebahadur, “Coronary artery disease in women,” Indian Heart Journal, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 532–538, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Williams, K. Bennett, and J. Feely, “Evidence for an age and gender bias in the secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease in primary care,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 604–608, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Gallucci, A. Tartarone, R. Lerose, A. V. Lalinga, and A. M. Capobianco, “Cardiovascular risk of smoking and benefits of smoking cessation,” Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 3866–3876, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Alkouri, Y. Khader, and A. M. Al-Bashaireh, “Prevalence of cigarettes and waterpipe smoking among Jordanians, refugees, and migrants in Jordan and its associated factors: a secondary data analysis,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 82, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
“The effects of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin on cause-specific mortality and on cancer incidence in 20,536 high-risk people: a randomised placebo-controlled trial [ISRCTN48489393],” BMC Medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. Sever, B. Dahlöf, N. R. Poulter et al., “Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial--Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 361, no. 9364, pp. 1149–1158, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Walsh and M. Pignone, “Drug treatment of hyperlipidemia in women,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 291, no. 18, pp. 2243–2252, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Dale, C. I. Coleman, S. A. Shah, A. A. Patel, J. Kluger, and C. M. White, “Impact of gender on statin efficacy,” Current Medical Research and Opinion, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 565–574, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Rashid Ibdah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

480

Downloads

295

Citations