|
| Challenge | Solution |
|
| Pilot sparked interested from additional hospital and university educators | (1) Invited speech therapy, exercise science, occupational therapy, nutrition, chaplaincy, and social work students and instructors |
|
| Additional schools, larger numbers of students | (1) Educational sessions held at 3 different universities |
| (2) Some sessions held in evening or on weekend |
|
| Students at variety of educational levels | (1) All students viewed presession didactics on TeamSTEPPS® and geriatric fall prevention |
| (2) Medical, pharmacy, and advanced practice students viewed additional didactic on evaluation and treatment |
|
| Students did not like poster session open flow | (1) Facilitators assigned to poster/skill session |
| (2) Students rotated by profession, so instruction matched learner needs |
|
| Too many students to participate in FRRC | (1) Some pharmacy, medical, and nurse practitioner students participated with clinic preceptors |
| (2) SP† added to educational session |
| (3) Students ran IP‡ session after SP evaluation |
|
| Students required feedback on SP | (1) Students presented SP IP results to expert panel |
| (2) Panel consisted of FRRC clinical and university educators |
|
