EEG/MEG Signal ProcessingView this Special Issue
A Subspace Method for Dynamical Estimation of Evoked Potentials
It is a challenge in evoked potential (EP) analysis to incorporate prior physiological knowledge for estimation. In this paper, we address the problem of single-channel trial-to-trial EP characteristics estimation. Prior information about phase-locked properties of the EPs is assesed by means of estimated signal subspace and eigenvalue decomposition. Then for those situations that dynamic fluctuations from stimulus-to-stimulus could be expected, prior information can be exploited by means of state-space modeling and recursive Bayesian mean square estimation methods (Kalman filtering and smoothing). We demonstrate that a few dominant eigenvectors of the data correlation matrix are able to model trend-like changes of some component of the EPs, and that Kalman smoother algorithm is to be preferred in terms of better tracking capabilities and mean square error reduction. We also demonstrate the effect of strong artifacts, particularly eye blinks, on the quality of the signal subspace and EP estimates by means of independent component analysis applied as a prepossessing step on the multichannel measurements.
E. Niedermeyer and F. Lopes da Silva, Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, USA, 1999.
K. H. Knuth, A. S. Shah, W. A. Truccolo, M. Ding, S. L. Bressler, and C. E. Schroeder, “Differentially variable component analysis: identifying multiple evoked components using trial-to-trial variability,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 3257–3276, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. V. Thakor, C. A. Vaz, R. W. McPherson, and D. F. Hanley, “Adoptive Fourier series modeling of time-varying evoked potentials: study of human somatosensory evoked response to etomidate anesthetic,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 108–118, 1991.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Cichocki, R. R. Gharieb, and T. Hoya, “Efficient extraction of evoked potentials by combination of Wiener filtering and subspace methods,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '01), vol. 5, pp. 3117–3120, Salt Lake, Utah, USA, May 2001.View at: Google Scholar
H. W. Sorenson, Parameter Estimation: Principles and Problems, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 1980.
H. E. Rauch, F. Tung, and C. T. Striebel, “Maximum likelihood estimates of linear dynamic systems,” AIAA Journal, vol. 3, pp. 1445–1450, 1965.View at: Google Scholar
G. H. Golub and C. F. van Loan, Matrix Computations, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md, USA, 1989.
I. Jolliffe, Principal Component Analysis, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1986.
A. Cichocki, “Blind signal processing methods for analyzing multichannel brain signals,” International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism, vol. 6, no. 1, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
A. Hyvärinen, J. Karhunen, and E. Oja, Independent Component Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
A. Cichocki and S. Amari, Adaptive Blind Signal and Image Processing, Learning Algorithms and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
J. Kaipio and E. Somersalo, Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2005.