Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2015, Article ID 108417, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/108417
Research Article

P300 and Decision Making under Risk and Ambiguity

1Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2Neuromanagement Lab, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

Received 10 February 2015; Revised 16 April 2015; Accepted 16 April 2015

Academic Editor: Justin Dauwels

Copyright © 2015 Lei Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. H. Knight, Risk, Uncertainly and Profit, Library of Economics and Liberty, 1921.
  2. A. Bechara, “The role of emotion in decision-making: evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 30–40, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. A. Huettel, C. J. Stowe, E. M. Gordon, B. T. Warner, and M. L. Platt, “Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity,” Neuron, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 765–775, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Smith, J. Dickhaut, K. McCabe, and J. V. Pardo, “Neuronal substrates for choice under ambiguity, risk, gains, and losses,” Management Science, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 711–718, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Heath and A. Tversky, “Preference and belief: ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–28, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. R. Fox and A. Tversky, “A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty,” Management Science, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 879–895, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Rode, L. Cosmides, W. Hell, and J. Tooby, “When and why do people avoid unknown probabilities in decisions under uncertainty? Testing some predictions from optimal foraging theory,” Cognition, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 269–304, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. H. Freeston, J. Rhéaume, H. Letarte, M. J. Dugas, and R. Ladouceur, “Why do people worry?” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 791–802, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. J. Einhorn and R. M. Hogarth, Decision Making under Ambiguity: A Note, Springer, 1988.
  10. D. Frisch and J. Baron, “Ambiguity and rationality,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 149–157, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. C. R. Fox and M. Weber, “Ambiguity aversion, comparative ignorance, and decision context,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 476–498, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Baron and J. C. Hershey, “Outcome bias in decision evaluation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 569–579, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. R. Bach, B. Seymour, and R. J. Dolan, “Neural activity associated with the passive prediction of ambiguity and risk for aversive events,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1648–1656, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Hsu, M. Bhatt, R. Adolphs, D. Tranel, and C. F. Camerer, “Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making,” Science, vol. 310, no. 5754, pp. 1680–1683, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. I. Levy, J. Snell, A. J. Nelson, A. Rustichini, and P. W. Glimcher, “Neural representation of subjective value under risk and ambiguity,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 1036–1047, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. Hajcak, J. S. Moser, C. B. Holroyd, and R. F. Simons, “The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes,” Biological Psychology, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 148–154, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Sato, A. Yasuda, H. Ohira et al., “Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300,” NeuroReport, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 407–411, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Wu and X. Zhou, “The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation,” Brain Research, vol. 1286, pp. 114–122, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. Yeung and A. G. Sanfey, “Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 28, pp. 6258–6264, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. Zhang, R. Gu, L. S. Broster et al., “Linking brain electrical signals elicited by current outcomes with future risk decision-making,” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 8, article 84, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Z. Zhou, R. Yu, and X. Zhou, “To do or not to do? Action enlarges the FRN and P300 effects in outcome evaluation,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3606–3613, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Q. Xu, Q. Shen, P. Chen, Q. Ma, D. Sun, and Y. Pan, “How an uncertain cue modulates subsequent monetary outcome evaluation: an ERP study,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 505, no. 2, pp. 200–204, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Gu, Y. Ge, Y. Jiang, and Y.-J. Luo, “Anxiety and outcome evaluation: the good, the bad and the ambiguous,” Biological Psychology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 200–206, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. Bellebaum, D. Polezzi, and I. Daum, “It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 3343–3350, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Chandra, S. C. Srivastava, and Y.-L. Theng, “Evaluating the role of trust in consumer adoption of mobile payment systems: an empirical analysis,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 561–588, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  26. R. San Martín, “Event-related potential studies of outcome processing and feedback-guided learning,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 6, p. 304, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. Karis, M. Fabiani, and E. Donchin, “‘P300’ and memory: individual differences in the von Restorff effect,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 177–216, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. Azizian and J. Polich, “Evidence for attentional gradient in the serial position memory curve from event-related potentials,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2071–2081, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Polich, “Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 118, no. 10, pp. 2128–2148, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Lei and M. Roetting, “Influence of task combination on EEG spectrum modulation for driver workload estimation,” Human Factors, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 168–179, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. Donchin, A. Kramer, and C. Wickens, “Applications of brain event-related potentials to problems in engineering psychology,” in Psychophysiology: Systems, Processes, and Applications, pp. 702–718, Guilford, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  32. B. Palmer, V. T. Nasman, and G. F. Wilson, “Task decision difficulty: effects on ERPs in a same-different letter classification task,” Biological Psychology, vol. 38, no. 2-3, pp. 199–214, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. B. K. Bonala and B. H. Jansen, “A computational model for generation of the P300 evoked potential component,” Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 277–294, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Kok, “Event-related-potential (ERP) reflections of mental resources: a review and synthesis,” Biological Psychology, vol. 45, no. 1–3, pp. 19–56, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Kramer, W. Schneider, A. Fisk, and E. Donchin, “The effects of practice and task structure on components of the event-related brain potential,” Psychophysiology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 33–47, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Mecklinger, A. F. Kramer, and D. L. Strayer, “Event related potentials and EEG components in a semantic memory search task,” Psychophysiology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 104–119, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Kok, “On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity,” Psychophysiology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 557–577, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. Polich, “Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 311–320, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. T. R. H. Cutmore and T. D. Muckert, “Event-related potentials can reveal differences between two decision-making groups,” Biological Psychology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 159–179, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. Yuan, Q. Zhang, A. Chen et al., “Are we sensitive to valence differences in emotionally negative stimuli? Electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 2764–2771, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. K. R. MacCrimmon and S. Larsson, “Utility theory: axioms versus paradoxes,” in Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox, vol. 21, pp. 333–409, Springer, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  42. S. P. Curley, J. F. Yates, and R. A. Abrams, “Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 230–256, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. D. Ellsberg, “Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 643–669, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. H. Nittono, Y. Otsuka, and P. Ullsperger, “Asymmetrical effects of frequent gains and frequent losses in a gambling task,” Neuroreport, vol. 19, no. 13, pp. 1345–1349, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. S. M. Carpenter, E. Peters, D. Västfjäll, and A. M. Isen, “Positive feelings facilitate working memory and complex decision making among older adults,” Cognition and Emotion, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 184–192, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. M. Fuster, “Unit activity in prefrontal cortex during delayed-response performance: neuronal correlates of transient memory,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 61–78, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. J. Dugas, M. H. Freeston, and R. Ladouceur, “Intolerance of uncertainty and problem orientation in worry,” Cognitive Therapy and Research, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 593–606, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A. L. Krain, S. Hefton, D. S. Pine et al., “An fMRI examination of developmental differences in the neural correlates of uncertainty and decision-making,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1023–1030, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. Brand, F. Grabenhorst, K. Starcke, M. M. P. Vandekerckhove, and H. J. Markowitsch, “Role of the amygdala in decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: evidence from patients with Urbach-Wiethe disease,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1305–1317, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. Achtziger, C. Alós-Ferrer, S. Hügelschäfer, and M. Steinhauser, “The neural basis of belief updating and rational decision making,” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID nss099, pp. 55–62, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus