Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2015, Article ID 359590, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/359590
Research Article

Characterizing the Input-Output Function of the Olfactory-Limbic Pathway in the Guinea Pig

1Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, 16163 Genova, Italy
2Laboratory for Computational and Statistical Learning, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, 16163 Genova, Italy
3Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and System Engineering (DIBRIS), Università degli studi di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 35, 16146 Genova, Italy

Received 7 April 2015; Accepted 6 July 2015

Academic Editor: Christian W. Dawson

Copyright © 2015 Gian Luca Breschi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M.-C. Hsiao, D. Song, and T. W. Berger, “Nonlinear dynamical model based control of in vitro hippocampal output,” Frontiers in neural circuits, vol. 7, p. 20, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. W. Berger, R. E. Hampson, D. Song, A. Goonawardena, V. Z. Marmarelis, and S. A. Deadwyler, “A cortical neural prosthesis for restoring and enhancing memory,” Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 8, no. 4, Article ID 046017, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. H. Siah, C.-C. Chiang, M.-S. Ju, and C.-C. K. Lin, “Suppression of acute seizures by theta burst electrical stimulation of the hippocampal commissure using a closed-loop system,” Brain Research, vol. 1593, pp. 117–125, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. J. Guggenmos, M. Azin, S. Barbay et al., “Restoration of function after brain damage using a neural prosthesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 52, pp. 21177–21182, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. L. Baker, “Is there a support vector machine hiding in the dentate gyrus?” Neurocomputing, vol. 52–54, pp. 199–207, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. B. Aimone and F. H. Gage, “Modeling new neuron function: a history of using computational neuroscience to study adult neurogenesis,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1160–1169, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. de Curtis, D. Paré, and R. R. Llinás, “The electrophysiology of the olfactory-hippocampal circuit in the isolated and perfused adult mammalian brain in vitro,” Hippocampus, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 341–354, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Carriero, L. Uva, V. Gnatkovsky, and M. De Curtis, “Distribution of the olfactory fiber input into the olfactory tubercle of the in vitro isolated guinea pig brain,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 1613–1619, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Uva, B. W. Strowbridge, and M. de Curtis, “Olfactory bulb networks revealed by lateral olfactory tract stimulation in the in vitro isolated guinea-pig brain,” Neuroscience, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 567–577, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Cucker and S. Male, “On the mathematical foundations of learning,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–49, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  11. R. Llinas, Y. Yarom, and M. Sugimori, “Isolated mammalian brain in vitro: new technique for analysis of electrical activity of neuronal circuit function,” Federation Proceedings, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 2240–2245, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. de Curtis, G. Biella, C. Buccellati, and G. Folco, “Simultaneous investigation of the neuronal and vascular compartments in the guinea pig brain isolated in vitro,” Brain Research Protocols, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 221–228, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Muhlethaler, M. de Curtis, K. Walton, and R. Llinas, “The isolated and perfused brain of the guinea-pig in vitro,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 915–926, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. A. Wagenaar and S. M. Potter, “Real-time multi-channel stimulus artifact suppression by local curve fitting,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 113–120, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Maccione, M. Gandolfo, P. Massobrio, A. Novellino, S. Martinoia, and M. Chiappalone, “A novel algorithm for precise identification of spikes in extracellularly recorded neuronal signals,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 241–249, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. L. Bologna, V. Pasquale, M. Garofalo et al., “Investigating neuronal activity by SPYCODE multi-channel data analyzer,” Neural Networks, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 685–697, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. H. Perkel, G. L. Gerstein, and G. P. Moore, “Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. I. The single spike train,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 391–418, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. T. Buračas and T. D. Albright, “Gauging sensory representations in the brain,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 303–309, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Tacchetti, P. K. Mallapragada, M. Santoro, and L. Rosasco, “GURLS: a least squares library for supervised learning,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 14, pp. 3201–3205, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. Biella and M. de Curtis, “Olfactory inputs activate the medial entorhinal cortex via the hippocampus,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1924–1931, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. M. Bekkers and N. Suzuki, “Neurons and circuits for odor processing in the piriform cortex,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 429–438, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. Suzuki and J. M. Bekkers, “Neural coding by two classes of principal cells in the mouse piriform cortex,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 46, pp. 11938–11947, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Gal and S. Marom, “Entrainment of the intrinsic dynamics of single isolated neurons by natural-like input,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 18, pp. 7912–7918, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus