Research Article
Training Spiking Neural Models Using Artificial Bee Colony
Table 1
Statistical results obtained with the proposed methodology.
| Dataset | Mean | Confidence intervals | Tr. cr. | Te. cr. | TR | TE |
| Wine | 0.963 ± 0.015 | 0.878 ± 0.038 | [0.957–0.968] | [0.864–0.892] | Iris plant | 0.996 ± 0.006 | 0.957 ± 0.025 | [0.994–0.999] | [0.948–0.967] | Glass | 0.832 ± 0.029 | 0.703 ± 0.064 | [0.822–0.843] | [0.679–0.727] | Diabetes | 0.800 ± 0.016 | 0.743 ± 0.024 | [0.794–0.806] | [0.734–0.752] | Liver | 0.749 ± 0.024 | 0.688 ± 0.034 | [0.740–0.757] | [0.675–0.700] | Object recognition | 1.000 ± 0.000 | 0.990 ± 0.021 | [1.000-1.000] | [0.982–0.998] |
|
|
Tr. cr = training classification rate, Te. cr. = testing classification rate.
|