Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 2174613, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2174613
Research Article

Motivation Classification and Grade Prediction for MOOCs Learners

1Computing Center, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
2College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China

Received 5 September 2015; Revised 20 November 2015; Accepted 23 November 2015

Academic Editor: Elio Masciari

Copyright © 2016 Bin Xu and Dan Yang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. G. Martin, “Will massive open online courses change how we teach?” Communications of the ACM, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 26–28, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. U.-M. O'Reilly and K. Veeramachaneni, “Technology for mining the big data of MOOCs,” Research & Practice in Assessment, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 29–37, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  3. L. A. Stein, “Casting a wider net,” Science, vol. 338, no. 6113, pp. 1422–1423, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. M. M. Waldrop, “Online learning: campus 2.0,” Nature, vol. 495, no. 7440, pp. 160–163, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. J. Williams and B. Williams, “Using interventions to improve online learning,” in Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) Workshop on Data Driven Education, 2013.
  6. J. Diez, O. Luaces, A. A. Betanzos et al., “Peer assessment in MOOCs using preference learning via matrix factorization,” in Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) Workshop on Data Driven Education, 2013.
  7. N. B. Shah, J. K. Bradley, A. Parekh et al., “A case for ordinal peer evaluation in MOOCs,” in Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) Workshop on Data Driven Education, 2013.
  8. D. Yang, T. Sinha, D. Adamson et al., “Turn on, tune in, drop out: anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses,” in Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) Workshop on Data Driven Education, 2013.
  9. A. Ramesh, D. Goldwasser, B. Huang et al., “Modeling learner engagement in MOOCs using probabilistic soft logic,” in Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) Workshop on Data Driven Education, December 2013.
  10. G. Balakrishnan, “Predicting student retention in massive open online courses using hidden Markov models,” Tech. Rep. UCB/EECS-2013-109, University of California, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  11. R. Kizilcec, C. Piech, and E. Schneider, “Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '13), pp. 170–179, Leuven, Belgium, April 2013.
  12. A. Anderson, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and J. Leskovec, “Engaging with massive online courses,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '14), pp. 687–697, Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Taylor, K. Veeramachaneni, and U.-M. O'Reilly, “Likely to stop? Predicting stopout in massive open online courses,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.3382.
  14. T. Sinha, P. Jermann, N. Li, and P. Dillenbourg, “Your click decides your fate: inferring information processing and attrition behavior form mooc video clickstream interactions,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.7131.
  15. W. Drevo, Delphi: a distributed multi-algorithm, multi-user, self optimizing machine learning system [M.S. thesis], Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2014.
  16. A. Agrawal, J. Venkatraman, S. Leonard et al., YouEDU: Addressing Confusion in MOOC Discussion Forums by Recommending Instructional Video Clips, Stanford InfoLab, 2015.
  17. L. Breslow, D. E. Pritchard, J. DeBoer et al., “Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: research into edX's first MOOC,” Research & Practice in Assessment, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  18. R. F. Kizilcec and E. Schneider, “Motivation as a lens to understand online learners: toward data-driven design with the OLEI scale,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 22, no. 2, article 6, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. D. Ho, I. Chuang, J. Reich et al., HarvardX and MITx: Two Years of Open Online Courses, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar