Classifying EEG Signals during Stereoscopic Visualization to Estimate Visual Comfort

<div>Average ERSP in Pz (medial parietal region). (a) No-comfort condition; (b) comfort condition (<svg height="5.65839pt" id="M7" style="vertical-align:-0.04980993pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.60858 7.75925 5.65839" width="7.75925pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M537 353L508 390C487 357 455 333 417 333C389 333 344 353 309 370C265 391 212 414 172 414C122 414 79 382 50 340L81 307C101 339 134 364 172 364C198 364 245 343 280 326C324 305 375 283 417 283C466 283 507 314 537 353ZM537 168L508 205C487 172 455 148 417 148C389 148 344 168 309 185C265 206 212 229 172 229C122 229 79 197 50 155L81 122C101 154 134 179 172 179C198 179 245 158 280 141C324 120 375 98 417 98C466 98 507 129 537 168Z" id="g117-132"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="587" vert-adv-y="587"></glyph.data></g></svg>160 trials each, 12 participants).</div>

Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience

fig6

Figure 6

Figure 6: Classifying EEG Signals during Stereoscopic Visualization to Estimate Visual Comfort 