Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Corrigendum

A corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the corrigendum, please click here.

Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 3039454, 22 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3039454
Research Article

Time-Shift Correlation Algorithm for P300 Event Related Potential Brain-Computer Interface Implementation

1Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan
3Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan
4Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan
5Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan

Received 2 March 2016; Revised 23 May 2016; Accepted 22 June 2016

Academic Editor: Paolo Del Giudice

Copyright © 2016 Ju-Chi Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Leeb, L. Tonin, M. Rohm, L. Desideri, T. Carlson, and J. D. R. Millán, “Towards independence: a BCI telepresence robot for people with severe motor disabilities,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 969–982, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Frisoli, C. Loconsole, D. Leonardis et al., “A new gaze-BCI-driven control of an upper limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation in real-world tasks,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1169–1179, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Long, Y. Li, H. Wang, T. Yu, J. Pan, and F. Li, “A hybrid brain computer interface to control the direction and speed of a simulated or real wheelchair,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 720–729, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. I. Iturrate, J. M. Antelis, A. Kübler, and J. Minguez, “A noninvasive brain-actuated wheelchair based on a P300 neurophysiological protocol and automated navigation,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 614–627, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. Gandhi, G. Prasad, D. Coyle, L. Behera, and T. M. McGinnity, “EEG-Based mobile robot control through an adaptive brain-robot interface,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1278–1285, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Chae, J. Jeong, and S. Jo, “Toward brain-actuated humanoid robots: asynchronous direct control using an EEG-Based BCI,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1131–1144, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Güneysu and H. L. Akin, “An SSVEP based BCI to control a humanoid robot by using portable EEG device,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC '13), pp. 6905–6908, Osaka, Japan, July 2013.
  8. S. Sutton, M. Braren, J. Zubin, and E. R. John, “Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty,” Science, vol. 150, no. 3700, pp. 1187–1188, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Polich, “Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 118, no. 10, pp. 2128–2148, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Goljahani, C. D'Avanzo, S. Silvoni, P. Tonin, F. Piccione, and G. Sparacino, “Preprocessing by a Bayesian single-trial event-related potential estimation technique allows feasibility of an assistive single-channel P300-based brain-computer interface,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 731046, 9 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. V. Bostanov, “BCI competition 2003-data sets Ib and IIb: feature extraction from event-related brain potentials with the continuous wavelet transform and the t-value scalogram,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1057–1061, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Rakotomamonjy and V. Guigue, “BCI competition III: dataset II- ensemble of SVMs for BCI P300 speller,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1147–1154, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. Dal Seno, M. Matteucci, and L. Mainardi, “Online detection of P300 and error potentials in a BCI speller,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2010, Article ID 307254, 5 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Lenhardt, M. Kaper, and H. J. Ritter, “An adaptive P300-based online brain-computer interface,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 121–130, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Wang, C. Guan, and H. Zhang, “P300 brain-computer interface design for communication and control applications,” in Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS '06), pp. 5400–5403, Shanghai, China, January 2006. View at Scopus
  16. M. Kaper, P. Meinicke, U. Grossekathoefer, T. Lingner, and H. Ritter, “BCI competition 2003-data set IIb: support vector machines for the P300 speller paradigm,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1073–1076, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. V. Manyakov, N. Chumerin, A. Combaz, and M. M. Van Hulle, “Comparison of classification methods for P300 brain-computer interface on disabled subjects,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2011, Article ID 519868, 12 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Cecotti and A. Gräser, “Convolutional neural networks for P300 detection with application to brain-computer interfaces,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 433–445, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Serby, E. Yom-Tov, and G. F. Inbar, “An improved P300-based brain-computer interface,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 89–98, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. Donchin, K. M. Spencer, and R. Wijesinghe, “The mental prosthesis: assessing the speed of a P300-based brain-computer interface,” IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 174–179, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Pearson, “Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. 58, pp. 240–242, 1895. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. R. Rojas, Neural Networks, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. P.-L. Lee, J.-J. Sie, Y.-J. Liu et al., “An SSVEP-actuated brain computer interface using phase-tagged flickering sequences: a cursor system,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 2383–2397, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus