Research Article
ELM Meets Urban Big Data Analysis: Case Studies
Table 3
The best average NDCG@10 results of optimal retain store placement.
| Cities | Starbucks | TrueKungFu | YongheKing |
| MART (single city) | Beijing | 0.743 () | 0.643 () | 0.725 () | Shanghai | 0.712 () | 0.689 () | 0.712 () | Hangzhou | 0.576 () | 0.611 () | 0.691 () | Guangzhou | 0.783 () | 0.691 () | 0.721 () | Shenzhen | 0.781 () | 0.711 () | 0.722 () |
| RankBoost (single city) | Beijing | 0.752 (23) | 0.678 (20) | 0.712 (19) | Shanghai | 0.725 (25) | 0.667 (20) | 0.783 (21) | Hangzhou | 0.723 (21) | 0.575 (19) | 0.724 (15) | Guangzhou | 0.812 (22) | 0.782 (19) | 0.812 (18) | Shenzhen | 0.724 (22) | 0.784 (17) | 0.712 (12) |
| BP (Single city) | Beijing | 0.753 (45) | 0.658 (40) | 0.702 (41) | Shanghai | 0.724 (44) | 0.657 (42) | 0.7283 (44) | Hangzhou | 0.725 (41) | 0.555 (40) | 0.714 (45) | Guangzhou | 0.832 (45) | 0.772 (42) | 0.512 (41) | Shenzhen | 0.722 (47) | 0.754 (42) | 0.702 (45) |
| DAELM | Beijing | 0.755 (3) | 0.712 (2) | 0.755 (2) | Shanghai | 0.745 (5) | 0.751 (3) | 0.783 (1) | Hangzhou | 0.755 (5) | 0.711 (2) | 0.752 (5) | Guangzhou | 0.810 (9) | 0.810 (5) | 0.823 (4) | Shenzhen | 0.780 (9) | 0.783 (5) | 0.723 (8) |
|
|