Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2016, Article ID 9172506, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9172506
Research Article

EyeTribe Tracker Data Accuracy Evaluation and Its Interconnection with Hypothesis Software for Cartographic Purposes

1Palacký University, Olomouc, 77146 Olomouc, Czech Republic
2Masaryk University, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic

Received 25 November 2015; Revised 8 February 2016; Accepted 22 February 2016

Academic Editor: Ying Wei

Copyright © 2016 Stanislav Popelka et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. L. Allen, C. R. Miller Cowan, and H. Power, “Acquiring information from simple weather maps: influences of domain-specific knowledge and general visual-spatial abilities,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 337–349, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Edler, A.-K. Bestgen, L. Kuchinke, and F. Dickmann, “Grids in topographic maps reduce distortions in the recall of learned object locations,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 5, Article ID e98148, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. Kubíček, Č. Šašinka, and Z. Stachoň, “Vybrané kognitivní aspekty vizualizace polohové nejistoty v geografických datech,” Geografie, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 67–90, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  4. E. S. Nelson, “Using selective attention theory to design bivariate point symbols,” Cartographic Perspectives, vol. 32, pp. 6–28, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. E. S. Nelson, “Designing effective bivariate symbols: the influence of perceptual grouping processes,” Cartography and Geographic Information Science, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 261–278, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. H. Duc, P. Bays, and M. Husain, “Eye movements as a probe of attention,” in Progress in Brain Research, C. Kennard and R. J. Leigh, Eds., vol. 171, chapter 5.5, pp. 403–411, Elsevier, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. N. Andrienko and G. Andrienko, Exploratory Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Data. A Systematic Approach, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  8. J. M. Enoch, “Effect of the size of a complex display upon visual search,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 280–286, 1959. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Hyrskykari, S. Ovaska, P. Majaranta, K.-J. Räihä, and M. Lehtinen, “Gaze path stimulation in retrospective think-aloud,” Journal of Eye Movement Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1–18, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  10. Ö. Alaçam and M. Dalcı, “A usability study of WebMaps with eye tracking tool: the effects of iconic representation of information,” in Human-Computer Interaction. New Trends, vol. 5610 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 12–21, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. S. I. Fabrikant, S. Rebich-Hespanha, N. Andrienko, G. Andrienko, and D. R. Montello, “Novel method to measure inference affordance in static small-multiple map displays representing dynamic processes,” Cartographic Journal, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 201–215, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. I. Fabrikant, S. R. Hespanha, and M. Hegarty, “Cognitively inspired and perceptually salient graphic displays for efficient spatial inference making,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 13–29, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Ooms, P. De Maeyer, and V. Fack, “Study of the attentive behavior of novice and expert map users using eye tracking,” Cartography and Geographic Information Science, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 37–54, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Popelka and A. Brychtova, “Eye-tracking study on different perception of 2D and 3D terrain visualisation,” Cartographic Journal, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 240–246, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. M. Olson, “Cognitive cartographic experimentation,” Cartographica, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 34–44, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  16. Z. Štěrba, Č. Šašinka, Z. Stachoň, P. Kubíček, and S. Tamm, “Mixed research design in cartography: a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches,” Kartographische Nachrichten, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 262–269, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  17. J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 2003.
  18. Z. Štěrba, Č. Šašinka, Z. Stachoň, K. Morong, and R. Štampach, Selected Issues of Experimental Testing in Cartography, Masaryk University, 2015, http://munispace.muni.cz/index.php.
  19. M. Konečný, Š. Březinová, M. V. Drápela et al., Dynamická Geovizualizace v Krizovém Managementu, Masarykova Univerzita, Brno, Czech Republic, 2011 (Czech).
  20. P. Kubíček, Č. Šašinka, and Z. Stachoň, “Uncertainty visualisation testing,” in Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Cartography and GIS, Sofia, Bulgaria, June 2012.
  21. Z. Stachoň, Č. Šašinka, P. Kubíček, and Z. Štěrba, “MuTeP—alternativní nástroj pro testování kartografických vizualizací a sběr dat,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Sjezd České Geografické Společnosti, Prague, Czech Republic, 2014 (Czech).
  22. Z. Stachoň, Č. Šašinka, Z. Štěrba, J. Zbořil, Š. Březinová, and J. Švancara, “Influence of graphic design of cartographic symbols on perception structure,” Kartographische Nachrichten, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 216–220, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  23. K. Morong and Č. Šašinka, “Hypothesis—online software platform for objective experimental testing,” in Proceedings of the Applying Principles of Cognitive Psychology in Practice, Brno, Czech Republic, May 2014.
  24. S. W. T. Widgets, https://www.eclipse.org/swt/.
  25. E. Dalmaijer, “Is the low-cost EyeTribe eye tracker any good for research?” PeerJ PrePrints, vol. 2, Article ID e585v1, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. K. Ooms, L. Dupont, L. Lapon, and S. Popelka, “Accuracy and precision of fixation locations recorded with the low-cost Eye Tribe tracker in different experimental set-ups,” Journal of Eye Movement Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  27. A. Voßkühler, V. Nordmeier, L. Kuchinke, and A. M. Jacobs, “OGAMA (Open Gaze and Mouse Analyzer): open-source software designed to analyze eye and mouse movements in slideshow study designs,” Behavior Research Methods, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1150–1162, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Popelka, “Optimal eye fixation detection settings for cartographic purposes,” in Proceedings of the 14th SGEM GeoConference on Informatics, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing (SGEM '14), vol. 1, pp. 705–712, June 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. S. Popelka and J. Doležalová, “Non-photorealistic 3D visualization in city maps: an eye-tracking study,” in Modern Trends in Cartography, pp. 357–367, Springer, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  30. K. Holmqvist, M. Nyström, R. Andersson, R. Dewhurst, H. Jarodzka, and J. Van de Weijer, Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2011.
  31. J. Nielsen, Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users, Nielsen Norman Group, 2000, http://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/.
  32. J. Čenek, “Individualism and collectivism and their cognitive correlates in cross-cultural research,” The Journal of Education, Culture and Society, vol. 2, pp. 210–225, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  33. R. E. Nisbett, I. Choi, K. Peng, and A. Norenzayan, “Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition,” Psychological Review, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 291–310, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. E. Rubin, “Figure and ground,” in Visual Perception, S. Yantis, Ed., pp. 225–229, Psychology Press, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  35. J. Wagemans, J. H. Elder, M. Kubovy et al., “A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 1172–1217, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus