Research Article
Research of Hubs Location Method for Weighted Brain Network Based on NoS-FA
Table 1
Comparison of the evaluation results under different methods.
| Hub order number | Weighted betweenness method | Proposed method | Importance value | Region number | region name | Importance value | Region number | Region name |
| 1 | 1234 | 12 | R-RAC | 15.515 | 8 | R-SF | 2 | 1162 | 56 | L-ISTC | 13.099 | 49 | L-SF | 3 | 748 | 32 | R-ST | 12.868 | 37 | R-PUT | 4 | 714 | 63 | L-PCAL | 8.070 | 78 | L-PUT | 5 | 644 | 62 | L-CUN | 7.987 | 83 | BS | 6 | 622 | 42 | L-LOF | 7.204 | 35 | R-THA | 7 | 616 | 15 | R-ISTC | 6.942 | 18 | R-SP | 8 | 598 | 37 | R-PUT | 5.972 | 10 | R-PREC | 9 | 568 | 59 | L-SMAR | 5.892 | 59 | L-SP | 10 | 498 | 36 | R-CAU | 5.315 | 76 | L-THA | 11 | 482 | 55 | L-PC | 4.693 | 51 | L-PREC | 12 | 472 | 35 | R-THA | 4.346 | 60 | L-IP | 13 | 448 | 25 | R-FUS | 2.961 | 19 | R-IP | 14 | 448 | 34 | R-INS | 2.942 | 20 | R-PCUN | 15 | 436 | 71 | L-MT | 2.509 | 34 | R-INS |
|
|