Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2018, Article ID 5623165, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5623165
Research Article

The EEG Activity during Binocular Depth Perception of 2D Images

Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Street, Kazan 420008, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed to Marsel Fazlyyyakhmatov; ur.ufpk@yjylzafm

Received 26 October 2017; Accepted 1 January 2018; Published 30 January 2018

Academic Editor: Victor Hugo C. De Albuquerque

Copyright © 2018 Marsel Fazlyyyakhmatov et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. Skrandies and A. Jedynak, “Learning to see 3-D: Psychophysics and brain electrical activity,” NeuroReport, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 249–253, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Naganuma, I. Nose, K. Inoue, A. Takemoto, N. Katsuyama, and M. Taira, “Information processing of geometrical features of a surface based on binocular disparity cues: An fMRI study,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 147–155, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. P. S. Fischmeister and H. Bauer, “Neural correlates of monocular and binocular depth cues based on natural images: A LORETA analysis,” Vision Research, vol. 46, no. 20, pp. 3373–3380, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. T. Backus, D. J. Fleet, A. J. Parker, and D. J. Heeger, “Human cortical activity correlates with stereoscopic depth perception,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 2054–2068, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. M. Rutschmann and M. W. Greenlee, “BOLD response in dorsal areas varies with relative disparity level,” NeuroReport, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 615–619, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. V. N. Antipov and A. V. Zhegallo, “Three-dimensional perception of flat images in computerized environment,” Experimental Psychology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 97–111, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. Fink and M. Benedek, “EEG alpha power and creative ideation,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 44, pp. 111–123, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. K. M. Mihov, M. Denzler, and J. Förster, “Hemispheric specialization and creative thinking: A meta-analytic review of lateralization of creativity,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 442–448, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Bendetowicz, M. Urbanski, C. Aichelburg, R. Levy, and E. Volle, “Brain morphometry predicts individual creative potential and the ability to combine remote ideas,” Cortex, vol. 86, pp. 216–229, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Dietrich, “The cognitive neuroscience of creativity,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1011–1026, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. E. Beaty, M. Benedek, R. W. Wilkins et al., “Creativity and the default network: A functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 64, pp. 92–98, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Batey and A. Furnham, “Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature,” Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 355–429, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. Jauk, M. Benedek, B. Dunst, and A. C. Neubauer, “The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection,” Intelligence, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 212–221, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. I. P. Howard and B. J. Rogers, Binocular Vision and Stereopsis, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. O. J. Braddick and J. Atkinson, “Some recent findings on the development of human binocularity: A review,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 141–150, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. M. Norcia and C. W. Tyler, “Temporal frequency limits for stereoscopic apparent motion processes,” Vision Research, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 395–401, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. M. Norcia, E. E. Suiter, and C. W. Tyler, “Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of coarse and fine disparity mechanisms in human,” Vision Research, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1603–1611, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. Srinivasan, “Cognitive neuroscience of creativity: EEG based approaches,” Methods, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 109–116, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. A. Morozov, Yu. V. Obukhov, T. A. Stroganova, M. M. Tsetlin, and A. O. Prokofiev, “The search of the regularity in the spatio-temporal dynamics of the brain oscillations,” Iskusstvennyi Intellect [Artificial Intelligence], vol. 3, pp. 499–509, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  20. W. Klimesch, P. Sauseng, and S. Hanslmayr, “EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 63–88, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Makeig, M. Westerfield, T.-P. Jung et al., “Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses,” Science, vol. 295, no. 5555, pp. 690–694, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus