Review Article
A Systematic and Meta-Analysis Survey of Whale Optimization Algorithm
Table 13
Ranking of WOA-BAT optimization compared to GA, DE, ABC, and BSO.
| Functions | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | Rank | Subtotal | BSO |
| 1 | BSO | WOA-BAT | GA | DE | ABC | 2 | | | 2 | BSO | DE | WOA-BAT | ABC | GA | 3 | | | 3 | WOA-BAT | BSO | DE | ABC | GA | 1 | | | 4 | DE | WOA-BAT | BSO | ABC | GA | 2 | | | 5 | DE | BSO | WOA-BAT | ABC | GA | 3 | 11 | 9 | 6 | DE | BSO | WOA-BAT | ABC | GA | 3 | | | 7 | BSO | WOA-BAT | DE | ABC | GA | 2 | | | 8 | BSO | WOA-BAT | GA | DE | ABC | 2 | | | 9 | BSO | WOA-BAT | GA | DE | ABC | 2 | | | 10 | BSO | WOA-BAT | DE | ABC | GA | 2 | | | 11 | WOA-BAT | GA | DE | ABC | BSO | 1 | | | 12 | WOA-BAT | DE | BSO | GA | ABC | 1 | 13 | 14 | 13 | BSO | WOA-BAT | GA | DE | ABC | 2 | | | 14 | BSO | WOA-BAT | GA | ABC | DE | 2 | 4 | 2 | 15 | WOA-BAT | DE | ABC | BSO | GA | 1 | | | 16 | WOA-BAT | DE | ABC | BSO | GA | 1 | | | 17 | WOA-BAT | DE | ABC | BSO | GA | 1 | | | 18 | WOA-BAT | DE | BSO | GA | ABC | 1 | | | 19 | WOA-BAT | DE | BSO | GA | ABC | 1 | | | 20 | WOA-BAT | DE | BSO | GA | ABC | 1 | | | 21 | WOA-BAT | ABC | DE | BSO | GA | 1 | | | 22 | WOA-BAT | DE | ABC | GA | BSO | 1 | | | 23 | WOA-BAT | ABC | DE | BSO | GA | 1 | | | 24 | ABC | WOA-BAT | BSO | GA | DE | 2 | | | 25 | WOA-BAT | ABC | DE | GA | BSO | 1 | 12 | 42 | | Total | 40 | Total | 67 | Overall rank | 40/25 = 1.6 | Overall rank | 67/25 = 2.6 | F1–F5 | 11/5 = 2.2 | F1–F5 | 9/5 = 1.8 | F6–F12 | 13/7 = 1.8 | F6–F12 | 14/7 = 2 | F13–F14 | 4/2 = 2 | F13–F14 | 2/2 = 1 | F15–F25 | 12/11 = 1.9 | F15–F25 | 42/11 = 3.8 |
|
|