Review Article

A Systematic and Meta-Analysis Survey of Whale Optimization Algorithm

Table 4

Result comparison among optimization algorithms [5].

FDEGSAPSOFEPWOA
avgstdavgstdavgstdavgstdavgstd

F8−11080.1574.7−2821.07493.0375−4841.291152.814−12554.552.6−5080.76695.7968
F969.238.825.968417.47006846.7042311.629380.0460.01200
F107.40434.2E − 080.062070.236280.276050.509010.0180.00217.40439.897572
F110.000289027.701545.0403430.0092150.0077240.0160.0220.0002890.001586
F120.3396768E − 151.7996170.951140.0069170.0263019.2E − 063.6E − 060.3396760.214864
F131.8890154.8E − 148.8990847.1262410.0066750.0089070.000160.0000731.8890150.266088
F142.1119733.3E − 165.8598383.8312993.6271682.5608281.220.562.1119732.498594
F150.0005720.000330.0036730.0016470.0005770.0002220.00050.000320.0005720.000324
F16−1.031633.1E − 13−1.031634.88E − 16−1.031636.25E − 16−1.034.9E − 07−1.031634.2E − 07
F170.3978879.9E − 090.39788700.39788700.3981.5E − 070.3979142.7E − 05
F1832E − 1534.17E − 1531.33E − 153.020.1134.22E − 15
F19N/AN/A−3.862782.29E − 15−3.862782.58E − 15−3.860.000014−3.856160.002706
F20N/AN/A−3.317780.023081−3.266340.060516−3.270.059−2.981050.376653
F21−10.15320.0000025−5.955123.737079−6.86513.019644−5.521.59−7.049183.629551
F22−10.40293.9E − 07−9.684472.014088−8.456533.087094−5.532.12−8.181783.829202
F23−10.53641.9E − 07−10.53642.6E − 15−9.952911.782786−6.573.14−9.342382.414737