Research Article
Hybrid Low-Order and Higher-Order Graph Convolutional Networks
Table 3
Text network classification accuracy.
| Methods | R52 | OH | 20NG | R8 | MR |
| CNN-rand [22] | 87.59 | 58.44 | 82.15 | 95.71 | 77.75 | LSTM [23] | 85.54 | 41.13 | 65.71 | 93.68 | 75.06 | LSTM-pre [23] | 90.48 | 51.10 | 75.43 | 96.09 | 77.33 | PTE [24] | 90.71 | 53.58 | 76.74 | 96.69 | 70.23 | fastText [25] | 92.81 | 57.70 | 79.38 | 96.13 | 75.14 | SWEM [26] | 92.94 | 63.12 | 85.16 | 95.32 | 76.65 | LEAM [27] | 91.84 | 58.58 | 81.91 | 93.31 | 76.95 | GCN-C [13] | 92.75 | 63.86 | 81.42 | 96.99 | 77.22 | GCN-S [5] | 92.74 | 62.82 | — | 96.80 | 76.99 | GCN-F [11] | 93.20 | 63.04 | — | 96.89 | 76.74 | Text GCN [21] | 93.56 | 68.36 | 86.34 | 97.07 | 76.74 | HLHG-2 (ours) | 94.21 ± 0.14 | 69.16 ± 0.19 | 86.57 ± 0.08 | 97.25 ± 0.10 | 75.95 ± 0.14 | HLHG-3 (ours) | 94.33 ± 0.16 | 69.36 ± 0.24 | 86.35 ± 0.24 | 97.25 ± 0.12 | 76.49 ± 0.32 |
|
|