Research Article
A New Image Classification Approach via Improved MobileNet Models with Local Receptive Field Expansion in Shallow Layers
Table 3
Classification accuracy rates (%) on Caltech-256 dataset.
| Number of iterations | 30000 | 35000 | 40000 | 45000 | 50000 |
| SqueezeNet | 41.48 | 43.06 | 43.39 | 43.58 | 44.03 | MobileNets | 64.48 | 64.58 | 64.55 | 64.67 | 64.52 | Dense1-MobileNet | 64.61 | 64.53 | 64.45 | 64.44 | 64.47 | Dense2-MobileNet | 65.62 | 65.67 | 65.84 | 65.78 | 65.79 | Dilated1-MobileNet | 65.77 | 65.74 | 65.87 | 65.90 | 65.87 | Dilated2-MobileNet | 66.10 | 66.06 | 65.94 | 65.84 | 65.94 | Dilated3-MobileNet | 64.97 | 64.9 | 64.87 | 65.19 | 65.16 |
|
|
We also validate our method on the Animals with Attributes (AwA) dataset [ 28]. The classification accuracy rates are shown in Table 4. |