Research Article
A Multistakeholder Approach to the Airport Gate Assignment Problem: Application of Fuzzy Theory for Optimal Performance Indicator Selection
Table 3
Performance indicators for AGAP.
| Performance criterion | Performance indicator | Source | Notes |
| Passenger-oriented objectives | Passenger walking time | [6, 7] | | Average passenger walking distance | [3–5] | Baggage transit distance | [9, 10] | Passenger waiting time | [11, 12] | Estimated passenger transit time | [13] |
| Airport/airline-oriented objectives | Number of flights assigned to remote gates | [14–17] | Or known as un-gated flight in some research papers | Daily towing moves | [13, 18, 19] | Total flight delay | [20] | Taxiing time | [21, 22] | Aircraft waiting time (for a gate) | [9, 10] | Number of consecutive flights | [24] | Number of arriving flights and the subsequent departing flights assigned to the same gate, if served by the same aircraft | Total flight-gate preferences | [15, 25] | Fuel consumption of taxiing operations | [8] | Number of passengers at gates close to shopping facilities | [26] | Aircraft gate size compatibility | [23] | Number of departing flights assigned close to the target airline VIP lounges | [24] | Number of flights assigned close to customs | [24] |
| Robustness-oriented objectives | Variance of the idle time | [29–31] | | Absolute deviation of new gate assignment from a reference schedule | [9, 16] | Expected gate conflicts | [20] | Idle time | [28] |
|
|