Research Article
Real-Time Gender Recognition for Juvenile and Adult Faces
Table 3
Comparative results of the proposed model for (a) Gabor, (b) Gabor-DWT, and (c) Gabor MeanDWT.
| Dataset | Feature Selection | Number Features | Classifier | Accuracy |
| FERET | Gabor | 419 840 | SVM (L) | | Gabor-DWT | 6560 | SVM (L) | | Gabor-mean | 83 968 | SVM (L) | | Gabor-meanDWT | 1312 | SVM (L) | |
| UTK | Gabor | 419 840 | SVM (L) | | Gabor-DWT | 6560 | SVM (L) | | Gabor-mean | 83 968 | SVN (L) | | Gabor-meanDWT | 1312 | SVM (L) | |
|
|
The Gabor MeanDWT method outperforms both Gabor and Gabor-DWT and other state-of-the-art methods, as shown in Table 2. |