Research Article
Research on Students’ Satisfaction of Intelligent Learning Based on Text Mining Technology
Table 1
Induction of degree terms.
| Worse (0∼0.2) | Bad (0.2∼0.4) | Medium (0.4∼0.6) | Good (0.6∼0.8) | Excellent (0.8∼1.0) |
| Completely confusing | Cannot keep up | A little bit vague | Have gained something | Easily approachable | Happy learning | Cannot understand it | Slow down a little | A little bit too fast | Apt to understand | Vivid language | Very novel | Solo lecture | A little slower | Not bad | Clear and understandable | Well organized | Draw upon all useful opinions | Too blunt | Slow it down | Okay | Easy to understand | Serious and responsible | More acceptable | Very difficult | Do not totally understand it | Interesting | Relaxing and humorous | Stimulate creative potential | Very diversified | So difficult | Do not totally get it | Serious | Better to receive | Passion | Very interesting | Hard to understand | Not too high | Not too much different | Stronger | Vivid | Very reasonable | Totally at loss | Do not understand it | Not boring | Practice coordination and cooperation | Young and energetic | High comment | Hard to identify | Do not get it | Moderate | Innovative | Like it so much | Very flexible | Hard to begin | Mess around | | Humorous and funny | Very clear | Very suitable | | Bad discipline | | Meticulous | So considerate | Highly efficient | | Not too good | | Sincere and meticulous | Learn a lot | Very interesting | | A little bit difficult | | Apt to absorb | Well promoted | Like it so much | | Embarrassing | | Not boring | Serious explanation | Very good impressive | | Stiff | | Exercise | Learn so much | | Relatively conventional | | Coordination and cooperation | |
|
|