Effectiveness of Perioperative Comprehensive Evaluation of Hip Fracture in the Elderly

Table 1

Comparison of general data between the study group and the control group.

Project	CGA group	Study group	χ ^2 /Z	P
Cases	70	85	—	—
Gender (female, %)	70.8	70.8	χ ^2 = 0.227	0.634^a
Age (years)	79.5	81.8	Z = −0.658	0.511^b
ASA (I, II/III, IV)	42/28 (60/40)	56/29 (65.9/34.1)	χ ^2 = 0.233	0.629^a
Femoral neck/intertrochanteric fracture (cases, %)	37/33 (52.9/47.1)	40/45 (47.1/52.9)	χ ^2 = 0.233	0.629^a
Operation mode
Femoral neck fracture
Cannulated screw (cases, %)	2 (5.4)	3 (7.5)	χ ^2 = 2.542	0.111^a
Hemiarthroplasty (cases, %)	29 (78.4)	29 (72.5)
Total hip replacement (cases, %)	6 (16.2)	8 (20.0)
Intertrochanteric fracture
DHS (cases, %)	3 (9.0)	1 (2.2)	χ ^2 = 2.542	0.111
Intramedullary nail (cases, %)	30 (91.0)	44 (97.8)

Note. a: χ² inspection; b: Mann–Whitney U test.