Research Article
Application of Fuzzy Clustering Model in the Classification of Sports Training Movements
Table 5
The comparison of recognition rate.
| Datasets | Methods | Average recognition rate (%) |
| KTH | Literature [17] | 72.94 | Literature [18] | 84.56 | Literature [19] | 85.42 | Literature [20] | 87.58 | Proposed | 92.90 |
| Weizmann | Literature [17] | 73.75 | Literature [18] | 81.22 | Literature [19] | 87.89 | Literature [20] | 91.23 | Proposed | 91.41 |
|
|