Research Article

Hyperspectral Image Classification with Optimized Compressed Synergic Deep Convolution Neural Network with Aquila Optimization

Table 4

HSI categorization for the Houston U dataset.

MethodsRNNDCNNSDCNNCSDCNNCSDCNN-AO

OA49.23 ± 1.4557.49 ± 1.3988.73 ± 1.1393.78 ± 0.8694.67 ± 1.08
AA78.20 ± 1.0649.60 ± 3.2988.46 ± 1.1783.14 ± 1.1194.44 ± 1.82
K53.97 ± 0.5851.04 ± 1.0389.62 ± 2.5489.13 ± 0.2697.33 ± 1.25
127.89 ± 1.091.66 ± 7.3392.00 ± 1.0337.21 ± 30.094.77 ± 11.6
249.46 ± 5.0042.87 ± 3.0489.79 ± 2.8082.69 ± 0.2692.56 ± 4.87
326.69 ± 2.6130.91 ± 8.2887.18 ± 7.2475.93 ± 1.2690.06 ± 4.53
422.79 ± 9.721.17 ± 3.2583.17 ± 5.5289.11 ± 1.1296.84 ± 4.89
537.71 ± 6.6769.79 ± 2.1386.75 ± 2.5579.28 ± 1.3495.65 ± 1.95
688.79 ± 1.7192.78 ± 0.7888.08 ± 3.0693.82 ± 0.3298.95 ± 0.96
738.54 ± 11.420.85 ± 7.5972.89 ± 29.740.69 ± 2.1392.48 ± 24.0
889.96 ± 2.1588.84 ± 3.1584.25 ± 2.4099.33 ± 0.3186.11 ± 3.09
957.81 ± 19.040.00 ± 0.0076.0 ± 49.028.00 ± 2.0599.72 ± 8.38
1067.46 ± 1.9167.53 ± 1.2490.47 ± 6.8787.28 ± 0.8995.30 ± 2.86
1182.56 ± 3.4973.88 ± 4.3394.57 ± 5.0395.21 ± 0.2399.84 ± 3.29
1254.14 ± 5.5648.46 ± 3.8577.47 ± 5.1692.77 ± 3.3792.56 ± 3.44
1334.47 ± 7.1783.02 ± 1.2297.26 ± 5.2949.93 ± 3.5697.89 ± 0.87
1484.32 ± 8.9593.94 ± 2.5989.16 ± 2.2295.89 ± 1.3795.89 ± 2.57
1548.75 ± 5.1247.64 ± 4.5698.00 ± 7.4996.77 ± 2.9893.74 ± 2.65