Research Article
A Deep Intelligent Attack Detection Framework for Fog-Based IoT Systems
Table 2
Performance metrics of considered DLMs.
| Dataset name | ML/DL model | Accr (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F1_S (%) |
| DDOS SDN | MLP | 99.46 | 99.25 | 99.4 | 99.32 | LSTM | 99.7 | 99.6 | 99.64 | 99.62 | Bi-LSTM | 99.63 | 99.78 | 99.29 | 99.53 | GRU | 99.66 | 99.55 | 99.6 | 99.57 | HEM | 97.87 | 99.17 | 97.28 | 98.22 | CNN + LSTM | 96.43 | 95.71 | 95.27 | 95.49 |
| NSLKDD | MLP | 99.05 | 99.04 | 99.12 | 99.08 | LSTM | 99.12 | 99.22 | 99.08 | 99.15 | Bi-LSTM | 98.95 | 98.85 | 99.13 | 98.99 | GRU | 98.43 | 98.41 | 98.56 | 98.48 | HEM | 98.28 | 99.62 | 96.8 | 98.19 | CNN + LSTM | 98.19 | 97.79 | 98.72 | 98.25 |
| UNSW-NB15 | MLP | 93.41 | 95.74 | 93.51 | 94.61 | LSTM | 94.11 | 95.87 | 94.47 | 95.16 | Bi-LSTM | 94.04 | 95.86 | 94.43 | 95.14 | GRU | 93.57 | 95.75 | 93.76 | 94.74 | HEM | 94.05 | 92.08 | 92.37 | 92.22 | CNN + LSTM | 92.85 | 94.37 | 94.05 | 94.21 |
| IoTID20 | MLP | 99.84 | 99.7 | 97.84 | 98.76 | LSTM | 99.88 | 99.77 | 98.4 | 99.08 | Bi-LSTM | 99.86 | 99.57 | 98.27 | 98.92 | GRU | 99.84 | 99.61 | 98.01 | 98.8 | HEM | 99.84 | 99.83 | 99.99 | 99.92 | CNN + LSTM | 99.76 | 99.7 | 96.58 | 98.11 |
|
|