Research Article
[Retracted] Development of an Appropriate Uncertainty Model with an Application to Solid Waste Management Planning
Table 4
The classical analysis and the proposed analysis of Example
3.
| Classical analysis |
| | [5.06, 17.46] | | [3.43, 6.05] | | [3.72, 4.35] | Novel analysis | | 1st-alt. | 2nd-alt. | 3rd-alt. | 4th-alt. | 5th-alt. | Alternative | (6.05, 3.72) | (3.43, 4.35) | (4.63, 4.08) | (5.12, 3.78) | (4.80, 4.01) | Superior | 17.46 | 5.06 | 10.06 | 13.001 | 10.01 | Inferior | 17.46 | 5.06 | 10.06 | 13.001 | 10.01 | Feasibility ratio | 0.001 | 1 | 0.248 | 0.061 | 0.154 | Optimality ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | Normalized risk factor | 0.215 | 0.162 | 0.202 | 0.213 | 0.208 | Utility (U) | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.12 | Additional note | | Definite-feasible | | | | Satisfied optimal | √ | | | | |
|
|