Research Article
Diagnosis of Retinal Diseases Based on Bayesian Optimization Deep Learning Network Using Optical Coherence Tomography Images
Table 10
Comparison of proposed models with other deep learning models.
| Models | Retinal diseases | Classification accuracy (%) |
| Models proposed in the literature | OctNET [13] | DME, CNV, and Drusen | 99.7 | Layer guided CNN [35] | DME, CNV, and Drusen | 89.9 | GAN [16] | DME, CNV, MH and Drusen | 93.9 | Deep CNN [36] | DMD and DME | 95.7 | CenterNet [11] | DR | 98.1 | AlexNet, ResNet-18, GoogleNet [18] | CSR | 99.6 | Capsule network [22] | DME, Drusen, and CNV | 99.6 | CNN [24] | DMD, DME, and CNV | 97.0 | Deep CNN [23] | CSR | 93.8 |
| Proposed pretrained models in this work | VGG16 | AMD, CNV, DME, CSE, DR, Drusen, MH | | (a) As a feature extractor | 79.36 | (b) As a fine tuner | 95.25 | Densenet201 | | (a) As a feature extractor | 93.81 | (b) As a fine tuner | 99.71 | InceptionV3 | | (a) As a feature extractor | 89.73 | (b) As a fine tuner | 96.78 | Xception | | (a) As a feature extractor | 90.99 | (b) As a fine tuner | 97.92 |
|
|