Research Article
Technical Diagnosis on Elite Female Discus Athletes Based on Grey Relational Analysis
Table 2
Reference and comparison of sequence raw data.
| Serial number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| The competition result is X0 (m) | 62.6 | 64.26 | 64.46 | 65.42 | 63.4 | 64.55 | 62.22 | 62.44 | 62.66 | 61.88 | Discus hand speed X1 (m/s) | 24.36 | 24.71 | 25.02 | 24.65 | 24.58 | 25.82 | 23.42 | 24.47 | 24.08 | 24.82 | Discus release angle X2 (°) | 39.22 | 38.88 | 38.11 | 37.04 | 38.99 | 39.74 | 38.39 | 35.92 | 38.32 | 34.57 | Left foot off the ground, shoulder and arm overpass angle X3 (°) | 0.24 | 2.21 | 4.05 | 4.77 | 16.03 | 16.13 | 24.76 | 4.72 | 4.19 | 8.39 | Right foot touching the ground trunk angle X4 (°) | 42.06 | 42.87 | 41.4 | 38.53 | 31.71 | 33.32 | 39.16 | 37.84 | 37.88 | 39.86 | The second support stage time is X5 (s) | 0.18 | 0.2 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.14 | Discus movement distance X6/m in double support stage | 2.04 | 1.88 | 1.87 | 1.92 | 1.87 | 1.86 | 1.32 | 1.24 | 1.44 | 1.45 | Double support body center of mass movement distance X7 (m) | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.28 |
|
|