Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume 26 (2012), Issue 8, Pages 525-531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/735386
Original Article

The Information Needs and Preferences of Persons with Longstanding Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Samantha Wong,1 John R Walker,1,2 Rachel Carr,1 Lesley A Graff,1,2 Ian Clara,1 Stephen Promislow,1 Linda Rogala,1,3 Norine Miller,1,3 Patricia Rawsthorne,1,3 and Charles N Bernstein1,3

1IBD Clinical and Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
2Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
3Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Received 13 October 2011; Accepted 28 November 2011

Copyright © 2012 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the information needs and preferred vehicles of information delivery to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) will enhance their care.

OBJECTIVE: To survey persons with longstanding IBD as to their information needs and preferred vehicles of information delivery.

METHODS: The population-based Manitoba IBD Cohort (n=271, mean disease duration 11 years) was surveyed to assess its information needs across 23 issues, both retrospectively at the time of diagnosis and currently.

RESULTS: Most participants (64%) were initially diagnosed by a gastroenterologist, or otherwise by a family physician (19%) or surgeon (12%). Recalling time of diagnosis, at least 80% rated as very important information about common symptoms of IBD, possible complications, long-term prognosis, medication side effects, self management of symptoms and when to involve the doctor, yet only 10% to 36% believed they received the right amount of information about these issues. Dietary guidance was also regarded as important by 80% to 89%, yet only 8% to 16% received the correct amount of information. Regarding current needs, a large proportion believed it would be very helpful to have more information about long-term prognosis (66%) and diet considerations (60% to 68%). The following information sources were regarded as very acceptable: medical specialist (81%); brochure (79%); family doctor (64%); and website (64%), with 51% ranking the medical specialist as the first choice. In a comparison of the responses of this cohort to those of a recently diagnosed sample, there was remarkable consistency in the information needs and most desired sources of information.

DISCUSSION: In the present population-based cohort with longstanding disease, dietary information was regarded as the least adequately addressed. There was clear openness to receiving information through other routes than just the medical specialist, suggesting that optimizing brochures and websites would be an important adjunct source of information.

CONCLUSION: Approximately 10 years after diagnosis, only a small percentage of persons with IBD believed they received the correct amount of information about the issues they regarded as most important to have discussed at diagnosis.