Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 2016, Article ID 2139264, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2139264
Research Article

Age Is the Only Predictor of Poor Bowel Preparation in the Hospitalized Patient

1Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
2Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
3Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman

Received 22 February 2016; Accepted 5 April 2016

Academic Editor: John Marshall

Copyright © 2016 Julia McNabb-Baltar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. M. Lee, K. K. Saules, C. S. Pomerleau et al., “Evaluating the ability of visual images to inform college women about the link between smoking and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and to motivate quitting: critical dimensions,” Journal of Cancer Education, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 154–158, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. K. Rex, J. H. Bond, S. Winawer et al., “Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1296–1308, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Gupta, J. L. Holub, and G. Eisen, “Do indication and demographics for colonoscopy affect completion? A large national database evaluation,” European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 620–627, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. R. Sanaka, N. Shah, K. D. Mullen, D. R. Ferguson, C. Thomas, and A. J. McCullough, “Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 101, no. 12, pp. 2726–2730, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. Lebwohl, T. C. Wang, and A. I. Neugut, “Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 2014–2020, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. M. Ness, R. Manam, H. Hoen, and N. Chalasani, “Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 1797–1802, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. E. H. Seo, T. O. Kim, M. J. Park et al., “Optimal preparation-to-colonoscopy interval in split-dose PEG bowel preparation determines satisfactory bowel preparation quality: an observational prospective study,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 583–590, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Y. W. Chung, D. S. Han, K. H. Park et al., “Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol a prospective study in Korea,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 43, pp. 448–452, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  9. H. Fatima, C. S. Johnson, and D. K. Rex, “Patients' description of rectal effluent and quality of bowel preparation at colonoscopy,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 1244.e2–1252.e2, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. L. Nguyen and M. Wieland, “Risk factors predictive of poor quality preparation during average risk colonoscopy screening: the importance of health literacy,” Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 369–372, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. B. Borg, N. K. Gupta, G. R. Zuckerman, B. Banerjee, and C. P. Gyawali, “Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 670–675, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W.-K. Chan, A. Saravanan, J. Manikam, K.-L. Goh, and S. Mahadeva, “Appointment waiting times and education level influence the quality of bowel preparation in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy,” BMC Gastroenterology, vol. 11, article 86, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. K. Rex, T. F. Imperiale, D. R. Latinovich, and L. L. Bratcher, “Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 1696–1700, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. A. Deyo, D. C. Cherkin, and M. A. Ciol, “Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 613–619, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. E. Charlson, F. L. Sax, C. R. MacKenzie, S. D. Fields, R. L. Braham, and R. G. Douglas Jr., “Assessing illness severity: does clinical judgment work?” Journal of Chronic Diseases, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 439–452, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. C. Harewood, V. K. Sharma, and P. de Garmo, “Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 76–79, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Mazumdar and J. R. Glassman, “Categorizing a prognostic variable: review of methods, code for easy implementation and applications to decision-making about cancer treatments,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 113–132, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. M. O'Brien, “A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors,” Quality & Quantity, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 673–690, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Coriat, A. Lecler, D. Lamarque et al., “Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 4, Article ID e33957, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Church, “Adenoma detection rate and the quality of colonoscopy: the sword has two edges,” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 520–523, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. D. Wexner, D. E. Beck, T. H. Baron et al., “A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a Task Force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) (vol 63, pg 894, 2006),” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 64, p. 154, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  22. F. Froehlich, V. Wietlisbach, J.-J. Gonvers, B. Burnand, and J.-P. Vader, “Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 378–384, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. O. Hendry, J. T. Jenkins, and R. H. Diament, “The impact of poor bowel preparation on colonoscopy: a prospective single centre study of 10 571 colonoscopies,” Colorectal Disease, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 745–748, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Lebwohl, F. Kastrinos, M. Glick, A. J. Rosenbaum, T. Wang, and A. I. Neugut, “The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1207–1214, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. S. Cappell and R. Abboud, “The impact of advances in instrumentation and techniques of colonoscopy from 1988 to 2008 on inpatient colonoscopy performance at a high volume endoscopy unit in the United States: significantly shorter procedure time, higher completion rate, performance on sicker inpatients, and near disappearance of flexible sigmoidoscopy,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 3521–3529, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus