Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 2016, Article ID 2493470, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2493470
Research Article

Digital Recording and Documentation of Endoscopic Procedures: Do Patients and Doctors Think Alike?

1Internal Ward B, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 47 Golomb St., Haifa, Israel
2The School of Public Health, International Center for Health, Law and Ethics, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
3Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
4Department of General Surgery, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 47 Golomb St., Haifa, Israel
5Pulmonology Institute and CF Center, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
6Gastroenterology Unit, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 47 Golomb St., Haifa, Israel

Received 2 July 2016; Revised 2 November 2016; Accepted 6 November 2016

Academic Editor: Grigorios I. Leontiadis

Copyright © 2016 Nadav Willner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. K. Rex, “Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 51, no. 4, part 1, pp. 451–459, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. I. Thuraisingam, J. L. Brown, and J. T. Anderson, “What are the sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic photographs in determining completion of colonoscopy? Results from an online questionnaire,” European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 567–71, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  3. D. K. Rex, D. G. Hewett, M. Raghavendra, and N. Chalasani, “The impact of videorecording on the quality of colonoscopy performance: a pilot study,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 2312–2317, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. K. Rex, “Looking over your shoulder during colonoscopy: potential roles for videorecording colonoscopy withdrawals,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 134–137, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. F. Madhoun and W. M. Tierney, “The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 127–133, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. A. Makary, “The power of video recording: taking quality to the next level,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 309, no. 15, pp. 1591–1592, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Sharp, G. Mazzon, and R. Thilagarajah, “A cross-sectional pilot study to investigate patient attitudes and perception regarding the use of real time digital recording of urological procedures for research and teaching purposes,” Annals of Medicine and Surgery, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 151–157, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. M. J. Turnbull and E. S. Emsley, “Video recording of ophthalmic surgery—ethical and legal considerations,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 553–558, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. R. Henken, F. W. Jansen, J. Klein, L. P. S. Stassen, J. Dankelman, and J. J. van den Dobbelsteen, “Implications of the law on video recording in clinical practice,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2909–2916, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. P. Marcus, “Admissibility and effects of videotapes of medical procedures in litigation,” Journal of Legal Medicine, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 401–429, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Raghavendra and D. K. Rex, “Patient interest in video recording of colonoscopy: a survey,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 458–461, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus