Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 2016, Article ID 2580894, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2580894
Research Article

Effect of Colonoscopy Volume on Quality Indicators

Department of Surgery, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL, Canada A1B 3V6

Received 3 September 2015; Accepted 4 May 2016

Academic Editor: Grigorios I. Leontiadis

Copyright © 2016 David Pace et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. J. Winawer, A. G. Zauber, M. N. Ho et al., “The National Polyp Study Workgroup. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 329, pp. 1977–1981, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  2. A. D. Müller and A. Sonnenberg, “Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy: a case-control study of 32 702 veterans,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 123, no. 12, pp. 904–910, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Loeve, M. van Ballegooijen, P. Snel, and J. D. F. Habbema, “Colorectal cancer risk after colonoscopic polypectomy: a population-based study and literature search,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 416–422, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. J. Robertson, E. R. Greenberg, M. Beach et al., “Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance,” Gastroenterology, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 34–41, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Brenner, M. Hoffmeister, V. Arndt, C. Stegmaier, L. Altenhofen, and U. Haug, “Protection from right-and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 89–95, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. D. Wexner, J. E. Garbus, and J. J. Singh, “A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 251–261, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Bhangu, D. M. Bowley, R. Horner, E. Baranowski, S. Raman, and S. Karandikar, “Volume and accreditation, but not specialty, affect quality standards in colonoscopy,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 1436–1444, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. N. Baxter, R. Sutradhar, S. S. Forbes, L. F. Paszat, R. Saskin, and L. Rabeneck, “Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer,” Gastroenterology, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. F. Kaminski, J. Regula, E. Kraszewska et al., “Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, no. 19, pp. 1795–1803, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. A. Corley, C. D. Jensen, A. R. Marks et al., “Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 370, no. 14, pp. 1298–1306, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Adler, K. Wegscheider, D. Lieberman et al., “Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3),” Gut, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 236–241, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. A. Shah, L. F. Paszat, R. Saskin, T. A. Stukel, and L. Rabeneck, “Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study,” Gastroenterology, vol. 132, no. 7, pp. 2297–2303, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. C. Chen and D. K. Rex, “Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 856–861, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. J. Kahi, K. C. Vemulapalli, C. S. Johnson, and D. K. Rex, “Improving measurement of the adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy quality metric: the Indiana University experience,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 448–454, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. W. Ko, J. A. Dominitz, P. Green, W. Kreuter, and L.-M. Baldwin, “Specialty differences in polyp detection, removal, and biopsy during colonoscopy,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 528–535, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. F. Kaminski, J. Anderson, R. Valori et al., “Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial,” Gut, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 616–624, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Singh, P. P. Singh, M. H. Murad, H. Singh, and N. J. Samadder, “Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of interval colorectal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 1375–1389, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T. J. W. Lee, C. J. Rees, R. G. Blanks et al., “Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program,” Endoscopy, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 203–211, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. Solís-Muñoz, J. A. Solís-Herruzo, and S. Rodríguez-Muñoz, “The experience of the endoscopist increases detection rates of smaller size and higher histological grade polyps,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1237–1241, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. R. Sanaka, T. Gohel, A. Podugu et al., “Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1113–1119, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus