Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 2016, Article ID 3181459, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3181459
Research Article

Split-Dose Polyethylene Glycol Is Superior to Single Dose for Colonoscopy Preparation: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

1Division of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
2Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
3Forzani & MacPhail Colon Cancer Screening Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
4Division of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Received 9 August 2015; Accepted 4 October 2015

Copyright © 2016 Rachid Mohamed et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. F. Byrne, “The curse of poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 1587–1590, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Bensen, L. A. Mott, B. Dain, R. Rothstein, and J. Baron, “The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 194–199, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. K. Rex, C. S. Cutler, G. T. Lemmel et al., “Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies,” Gastroenterology, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 24–28, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Heresbach, T. Barrioz, M. G. Lapalus et al., “Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies,” Endoscopy, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 284–290, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. N. N. Baxter, M. A. Goldwasser, L. F. Paszat, R. Saskin, D. R. Urbach, and L. Rabeneck, “Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Singh, Z. Nugent, A. A. Demers, and C. N. Bernstein, “Rate and predictors of early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in Manitoba: a population-based study,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 2588–2596, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. J. Freeman, “Heterogeneity of colorectal adenomas, the serrated adenoma, and implications for screening and surveillance,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 14, no. 22, pp. 3461–3463, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. R. Jass, K. Baker, I. Zlobec et al., “Advanced colorectal polyps with the molecular and morphological features of serrated polyps and adenomas: concept of a ‘fusion’ pathway to colorectal cancer,” Histopathology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 121–131, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. J. Spring, Z. Z. Zhao, R. Karamatic et al., “High prevalence of sessile serrated adenomas with BRAF mutations: a prospective study of patients undergoing colonoscopy,” Gastroenterology, vol. 131, no. 5, pp. 1400–1407, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. Buecher, S. Bezieau, C. Dufilhol, E. Cauchin, M.-F. Heymann, and J.-F. Mosnier, “Emerging concepts in colorectal serrated polyps,” Gastroenterologie Clinique et Biologique, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 39–54, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. J. Y. Tan and J. J. Tjandra, “Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy—a meta-analysis,” Colorectal Disease, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 247–258, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. J. Vanner, P. H. MacDonald, W. G. Paterson, R. S. A. Prentice, L. R. Da Costa, and I. T. Beck, “A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 422–427, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Regev, G. Fraser, G. Delpre et al., “Comparison of two bowel preparations for colonoscopy: sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate versus sulphate-free polyethylene glycol lavage solution,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 1478–1482, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. M. Poon, D. W. H. Lee, S. K. Mak et al., “Two liters of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus sodium phosphate as bowel cleansing regimen for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial,” Endoscopy, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 560–563, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. N. O'Donovan, S. Somers, R. Farrow, J. Mernagh, J. Rawlinson, and G. W. Stevenson, “A prospective blinded randomized trial comparing oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol solutions for bowel preparation prior to barium enema,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 791–793, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. K. Rex, J. A. Di Palma, R. Rodriguez, J. McGowan, and M. Cleveland, “A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 328–336, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. V. K. Sharma, J. W. Schaberg, S. K. Chockalingam, R. Vasudeva, and C. W. Howden, “The effect of stimulant laxatives and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation on serum electrolytes and hemodynamics,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 238–239, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. K. Sharma, E. N. Steinberg, R. Vasudeva, and C. W. Howden, “Randomized, controlled study of pretreatment with magnesium citrate on the quality of colonoscopy preparation with polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 541–543, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. Abut, H. Guveli, B. Yasar et al., “Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 515–521, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. Abdul-Baki, J. G. Hashash, I. I. Elhajj et al., “A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of the adjunct use of tegaserod in whole-dose or split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 294–300, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. M. Church, “Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy—timing is the key!,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1223–1225, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. M. A. El Sayed, Z. A. Kanafani, F. H. Mourad et al., “A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 36–40, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. R. Gurudu, S. Ratuapli, R. Heigh, J. Dibaise, J. Leighton, and M. Crowell, “Quality of bowel cleansing for afternoon colonoscopy is influenced by time of administration,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 2318–2322, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Varughese, A. R. Kumar, A. George, and F. J. Castro, “Morning-only one-gallon polyethylene glycol improves bowel cleansing for afternoon colonoscopies: a randomized endoscopist-blinded prospective study,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 2368–2374, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. Matro, A. Shnitser, M. Spodik et al., “Efficacy of morning-only compared with split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled single-blind study,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1954–1961, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. A. Siddiqui, K. Yang, S. J. Spechler et al., “Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 700–706, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Rostom, E. Jolicoeur, C. Dubé et al., “A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 544–552, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. K. Enestvedt, C. Tofani, L. A. Laine, A. Tierney, and M. B. Fennerty, “4-liter split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to other bowel preparations, based on systematic review and meta-analysis,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1225–1231, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Rostom and E. Jolicoeur, “Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 482–486, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. Marmo, G. Rotondano, G. Riccio et al., “Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 313–320, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. S. Park, C. I. Sohn, S. J. Hwang et al., “Quality and effect of single dose versus split dose of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for early-morning colonoscopy,” Endoscopy, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 616–619, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. Gupta, A. Mandot, D. C. Desai, P. Abraham, A. Joshi, and S. Shah, “Comparison of two schedules (previous evening versus same morning) of bowel preparation for colonoscopy,” Endoscopy, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 706–709, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. S. Park, D. H. Sinn, Y.-H. Kim et al., “Efficacy and tolerability of split-dose magnesium citrate: low-volume (2 liters) polyethylene glycol vs. single- or split-dose polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for morning colonoscopy,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 1319–1326, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. R. Z. Unger, S. P. Amstutz, D. H. Seo, M. Huffman, and D. K. Rex, “Willingness to undergo split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and compliance with split-dose instructions,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 2030–2034, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus