Clinical Study

Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children and Adolescents with Abdominal Pain: Comparison with EoE-Dysphagia and Functional Abdominal Pain

Table 5

Follow-up EGD: correlation of symptom and eosinophil count changes.

EoE-D
baseline
On FU,
improved
On FU, not improvedEoE-AP
baseline
FU,
improved
FU, not improved

FU EGD36/64 patients28 (77.8%)8 (12.2%)28/63 patients12 (42.8%)16 (57.2%)
Eos; peak/mean43.6/40.825.2/22.864.6/56.638.5/34.631.2/30.459.5/49.5
NO FU EGD28/64 patients27 (96.4%)1 (3.6%)35/63 patients7 (20%)28 (80%)

FU: 36 (D) and 28 (AP) had follow-up EGD. Improvement based on single symptom score.
EoE-D group (): eosinophils baseline mean = 45.0; sd = 23.5. Follow-up mean = 17.7; sd = 20.3. Mean difference = −27.3; sd diff = 29.1, by paired .
EoE-AP group (): eosinophils baseline mean = 34.1; sd = 16.5. Follow-up mean = 32.0; sd = 32.0. Mean difference = −2.1; sd diff = 28, , not significant by paired .
FU: follow-up.