About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 4893501, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4893501
Research Article

Concomitant Prevalence of Low Serum Diamine Oxidase Activity and Carbohydrate Malabsorption

1Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital Steyr, Steyr, Austria
2Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital Steyr, Steyr, Austria
3Clinical Institute of Medical and Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
4Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
5Practice for General Internal Medicine, Bruck an der Mur, Austria
6Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Received 1 September 2016; Revised 13 November 2016; Accepted 21 November 2016

Academic Editor: Grigorios I. Leontiadis

Copyright © 2016 Dietmar Enko et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the concomitant prevalence rates for lactose malabsorption (LM), fructose malabsorption (FM), and histamine intolerance (HI) in patients with so far unexplained gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. A total of 439 outpatients, who presented unclear abdominal discomfort, underwent lactose (50 g) and fructose (25 g) hydrogen (H2) breath tests. Additionally, serum diamine oxidase (DAO) measurements were performed. Individuals with low serum DAO activity (<10 U/mL), GI symptoms, and response to histamine-free diet were diagnosed with HI. Of all 439 patients, 341 (77.7%) were found with 7 various GI conditions. In total, 94 (21.4%), 31 (7.1%), and 100 (22.8%) individuals presented LM, FM, or HI only, whereas 116 (26.4%) patients showed an overlap of GI entities investigated here. Interestingly, 89 out of 241 (36.9%) individuals with carbohydrate malabsorption were also diagnosed with HI (LM + HI: 52 [11.8%], FM + HI: 23 [5.2%], and LM + FM + HI 14 [3.2%] individuals). In conclusion different combinations of LM, FM, and HI are present in individuals with unclear abdominal discomfort/pain. In clinical practice we suggest testing for LM, FM, and additional HI in the diagnostic work-up of these patients. Depending on these various diagnoses possible, patients should get an individualized dietary advice.

1. Introduction

Nonspecific abdominal discomfort is a common and widespread condition worldwide. Among the multitude of differential diagnoses, carbohydrate malabsorption is a frequent cause of unexplained gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms [13].

Lactose malabsorption (LM) results from a reduced expression or impaired activity of the enzyme lactase in the epithelium of the small intestine. Hence, the nonabsorbable disaccharide lactose cannot be cleaved into the absorbable monosaccharides glucose and galactose [3, 4]. By comparison, fructose malabsorption (FM) is caused by limited absorption capacity of the GLUT-5 protein, the major fructose transporter in the small intestine [3, 5, 6]. The undigested and unabsorbed carbohydrates reach the large intestine, where the colonic bacteria ferment the sugar molecules, which may cause GI symptoms such as abdominal pain, bloating, and/or diarrhea [3, 7].

These complaints are also the leading GI symptoms of histamine intolerance (HI) [8, 9]. Therefore, this GI condition should also be considered as a possible underlying reason of unclear abdominal discomfort [8]. HI results from a disequilibrium of the biogenic amine histamine, which occurs to various degrees in many foods, and the reduced capacity of histamine degradation. An impaired activity (<10 U/mL) of serum diamine oxidase (DAO), which is the main enzyme for the metabolism of ingested histamine, causes an insufficient extracellular histamine breakdown in the GI tract [8, 10].

Using MEDLINE® database (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA), we could not find studies investigating serum DAO measurements in patients with carbohydrate malabsorption. Therefore, this retrospective study was conducted to investigate concomitant prevalence rates of LM, FM, and HI in patients presenting unexplained abdominal discomfort.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

A total of 439 case histories of outpatients, who visited the medical practice of internal medicine due to nonspecific abdominal complaints, were included in this retrospective analysis. The ethnic origin of all included individuals was Caucasian. All of them were investigated for LM, FM, and HI. Blood draw from a peripheral vein for DAO activity measurements was performed in the morning after an overnight fasting state (>12 h). None of the included patients was on histamine-free diet, had histamine releasing drugs, or had alcohol at the time of blood sampling and anamnesis. At the presentation a thorough evaluation of abdominal symptoms was made including a dietary history and the association between meal consumption and the occurrence of symptoms (Table 1).

Table 1: Main demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population.

Individuals presenting extraintestinal symptoms (e.g., migraine, dizziness, malaise, or headache) only, patients with gastritis caused by the intake of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, patients with acute or chronic inflammatory bowel or infectious disease and individuals with elevated anti-tissue-transglutaminase (TTG) IgA antibodies were not included in this evaluation. In addition to positive TTG IgA testing, a biopsy-based histological investigation of the small intestinal mucosa was part of the diagnostic evaluation. Helicobacter pylori infection was tested in all patients and eradication therapy was initiated if applicable. The data on H. pylori were not included in this manuscript because a causative role in GI malabsorption comparable to carbohydrate malabsorption is not confirmed.

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Johannes Kepler University Linz (Linz, Austria) and is in accordance with the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. LM and FM

Gas chromatography (Gastrolyzer, Bedfont Scientific Inc., Kent, United Kingdom) was employed to detect patients with LM and FM. Baseline breath hydrogen (H2) levels were measured after an overnight fasting state of > 12 hours. Lactose was given in a dose of 50 g dissolved in 200 mL of water. In the course of a following visit fructose was given in a dose of 25 g dissolved in 200 mL of water. In both tests the end-expiratory breath H2 concentration was measured at 0 (baseline before sugar ingestion), 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. The results were expressed in parts per million (ppm). According to the literature [3, 11, 12], patients with a H2 peak > 20 ppm above baseline H2 concentrations were classified as lactose and/or fructose malabsorbers independently of their self-reported clinical symptoms during or after the breath test. Patients were instructed to avoid physical effort, smoking, or eating during the lactose and fructose breath test. Patients with a colonoscopy, an antibiotic- or a laxatives-based therapy at least two weeks before test procedures, were excluded from the breath testing.

2.3. HI

The serum diamine oxidase (DAO) activity was measured using a quantitative radio extraction assay (DAO-REA®; Sciotec Diagnostic Technologies GmbH, Tulln, Austria).

The intra- and interassay reproducibility of the DAO radio extraction assay was < 10 and < 15% (information of the manufacturer). According to the literature [8, 13], in individuals with serum DAO activity < 3 U/mL, HI intolerance was expected, while in patients with serum DAO levels between 3 and 10 U/mL, HI was considered possible. Patients with DAO levels < 10 U/mL were identified with HI only if they showed two or more GI symptoms of HI (e.g., nausea, vomiting, meteorism, and/or abdominal pain) and a positive response to a low histamine diet [8, 13].

2.4. Statistics

Descriptive statistics were performed to analyze prevalence rates for LM, FM, and HI. The exact Chi-Square test for independence was used to compare categorical variables. A -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS Statistics for Windows version 22.0 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for statistical analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Population Characteristics

Of all 439 patients included, 138 (31.4%) were male and 301 (68.6%) were female with a median age of 43.8 years. The main demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population including the assessment of GI symptoms during the first consultation are provided in Table 1. None of the included patients showed signs of active acute or chronic inflammatory bowel disease.

3.2. DAO Serum Levels

All in all, 51 individuals (11.6%) were identified with a serum DAO level < 3 U/mL, 138 patients (31.4%) had a serum DAO level between 3 and 10 U/mL, and 250 (57.0%) individuals showed DAO serum levels ≥ 10 U/mL. No correlation was observed between serum DAO levels and the occurrence of LM () or FM ().

3.3. Differential Diagnoses of GI Conditions

As shown in Table 2, 341 (77.7%) patients were found with 7 various GI conditions, while 98 (22.3%) individuals remained negative for any GI entity investigated here. All in all, 94 (21.4%), 31 (7.1%), and 100 (22.8%) individuals presented LM, FM, or HI only, whereas 116 (26.4%) showed a diagnostic overlap of LM, FM and HI, respectively. Interestingly, 89 out of 241 (36.9%) individuals with carbohydrate malabsorption were identified with HI.

Table 2: Prevalence rates of LM, FM, and HI.

4. Discussion

In this study, 341 (77.7%) individuals with unclear abdominal complaints presented 7 various GI conditions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the most extensive investigation on concomitant prevalence rates for LM, FM, and including HI in such a large collective of patients.

With respect to carbohydrate malabsorption, H2 breath testing identified 241 (54.9%) patients with LM and/or FM, of which 89 (36.9%) individuals were also diagnosed with HI. These findings demonstrate that multiple combinations of carbohydrate malabsorption with HI may be associated with GI discomfort. This seems a great challenge for clinicians in view of individualized treatment options. Individuals with LM, FM and/or HI should get detailed dietary advice by registered dietitians, preferably at time of diagnosis.

In the present study and according to the literature [8, 13], individuals with serum DAO activity < 3 U/mL were expected with HI, while in patients with serum DAO levels between 3 and 10 U/mL, HI was considered possible. We observed no correlation between serum DAO levels and the occurrence of LM () or FM (). Nevertheless, present data show, that the diagnostic overlap between LM and HI was higher compared to FM and HI. In a recent study, we found serum DAO activity associated with LM phenotypic variation [14]. We observed, that patients with LM and a serum DAO activity level < 10 U/L presented higher end-exspiratory H2-levels in the lactose breath test compared to LM patients with DAO activity levels ≥ 10 U/mL [14]. DAO, the main enzyme in metabolizing ingested histamine, is synthesized by mature apical enterocytes, which are located in the upper intestinal villi [15]. It is continuously released from the intestinal mucosa and also transported to the blood circulation [16]. Mucosal damage in the small intestine caused by GI conditions (e.g., gastroenteritis, short bowel syndrome, GI surgery, drugs, celiac and tropical sprue) may reduce DAO and lactase activity, respectively [14, 17]. This could be one possible reason for the diagnostic overlap between LM and HI observed here.

The diagnosis of HI has its limitations. In general, the diagnostic approach of HI is difficult because the symptoms are highly variable and may affect almost all organs [9]. Moreover, standardized in vitro diagnostic tests for HI testing are still lacking [18]. Therapy of HI should be based on a consequent avoidance of histamine-rich food (e.g., spinach, tomatoes, long-ripened or fermented products, alcohol) or histamine liberators (e.g., citrus fruits, chocolate). A diet diary is suggested to document the improvement of symptoms during a histamine-free diet and to record the relapses in HI after dietary mistakes [8].

Not only the diagnostic approach of HI is difficult, but also limitations of the conventional lactose and fructose H2 breath test must be mentioned. The functional H2 breath test is considered a reliable, non-invasive diagnostic approach for patients with LM and FM [19], but the method is not standardized yet and pre-analytical poor patient preparation during the alveolar air collection may lead to false-negative test results [12]. Moreover, the acidic microclimate in the colon of patients with carbohydrate malabsorption can also cause decreased bacterial H2 production [20]. Another influencing cofactor of the H2 breath test is the orocecal transit time, which may also lead to false negative test results, because breath testing may be finished before a measurable H2 increase is established [11, 12]. Furthermore an individual and subjective perception of GI symptoms, which patients associate with carbohydrate malabsorption, must be considered [12, 21]. Visceral hypersensitivity is considered to play an essential role in functional symptoms, but the causal symptom triggers are not completely understood yet [3, 19].

Two limitations of this study may be described. Firstly, activities of the intestinal histamine-degrading enzyme histamine N-methyl-transferase were not measured because no standardized kit is commercially available yet. Secondly, serum DAO levels were determined at a single measuring point, only. Therefore, a prospective longitudinal study containing follow-up measurements is required to assess the clinical course of serum DAO levels in patients with unclear abdominal discomfort.

5. Conclusions

Patients with unexplained abdominal discomfort/pain present multiple combinations of carbohydrate malabsorption and HI. As a consequence we suggest testing for LM, FM, and additionally HI in the diagnostic work-up of these patients in clinical practice. Depending on differential diagnostic considerations, patients should get an individualized dietary advice.

Competing Interests

Wolfgang J. Schnedl is cofounder of GedoMed GmbH (Bruck an der Mur, Austria). The other authors have no competing interests.

References

  1. P. Born, “Carbohydrate malabsorption in patients with non-specific abdominal complaints,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 13, no. 43, pp. 5687–5691, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Goebel-Stengel, A. Stengel, M. Schmidtmann, I. van der Voort, P. Kobelt, and H. Mönnikes, “Unclear abdominal discomfort: pivotal role of carbohydrate malabsorption,” Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 228–235, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Enko, G. Kriegshäuser, C. Kimbacher, R. Stolba, H. Mangge, and G. Halwachs-Baumann, “Carbohydrate malabsorption and putative carbohydrate-specific small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: prevalence and diagnostic overlap observed in an Austrian outpatient center,” Digestion, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. Usai-Satta, M. Scarpa, F. Oppia, and F. Cabras, “Lactose malabsorption and intolerance: what should be the best clinical management?” World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 29–33, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. H. F. Jones, R. N. Butler, and D. A. Brooks, “Intestinal fructose transport and malabsorption in humans,” American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 300, no. 2, pp. G202–G206, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. S. C. Rao, A. Attaluri, L. Anderson, and P. Stumbo, “Ability of the normal human small intestine to absorb fructose: evaluation by breath testing,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 959–963, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. L. Madsen, J. Linnet, and J. J. Rumessen, “Effect of nonabsorbed amounts of a fructose-sorbitol mixture on small intestinal transit in healthy volunteers,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 147–153, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Maintz and N. Novak, “Histamine and histamine intolerance,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 1185–1196, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Zopf, H.-W. Baenkler, A. Silbermann, E. G. Hahn, and M. Raithel, “The differential diagnosis of food intolerance,” Deutsches Arzteblatt, vol. 106, no. 21, pp. 359–370, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Manzotti, D. Breda, M. Di Gioacchino, and S. E. Burastero, “Serum diamine oxidase activity in patients with histamine intolerance,” International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 105–111, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Eisenmann, A. Amann, M. Said, B. Datta, and M. Ledochowski, “Implementation and interpretation of hydrogen breath tests,” Journal of Breath Research, vol. 2, no. 4, Article ID 046002, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Enko, E. Rezanka, R. Stolba, and G. Halwachs-Baumann, “Lactose malabsorption testing in daily clinical practice: a critical retrospective analysis and comparison of the hydrogen/methane breath test and genetic test (C/T−13910 polymorphism) results,” Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2014, Article ID 464382, 6 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Rosell-Camps, S. Zibetti, G. Pérez-Esteban, M. Vila-Vidal, L. Ferrés-Ramis, and E. García-Teresa-García, “Histamine intolerance as a cause of chronic digestive complaints in pediatric patients,” Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 201–207, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Enko, G. Kriegshäuser, G. Halwachs-Baumann, H. Mangge, and W. J. Schnedl, “Serum diamine oxidase activity is associated with lactose malabsorption phenotypic variation,” Clinical Biochemistry, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. Y. Ji, Y. Sakata, X. Li et al., “Lymphatic diamine oxidase secretion stimulated by fat absorption is linked with histamine release,” American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 304, no. 8, pp. G732–G740, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Wollin, X. Wang, and P. Tso, “Nutrients regulate diamine oxidase release from intestinal mucosa,” American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 275, no. 4, pp. R969–R975, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B. Elsenhans, G. Hunder, G. Strugala, and K. Schümann, “Longitudinal pattern of enzymatic and absorptive functions in the small intestine of rats after short-term exposure to dietary cadmium chloride,” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 341–346, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Mušič, P. Korošec, M. Šilar, K. Adamič, M. Košnik, and M. Rijavec, “Serum diamine oxidase activity as a diagnostic test for histamine intolerance,” Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, vol. 125, no. 9-10, pp. 239–243, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Gasbarrini, G. R. Corazza, G. Gasbarrini et al., “Methodology and indications of H2-breath testing in gastrointestinal diseases: the Rome Consensus Conference,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 29, supplement, pp. 1–49, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. H. Vogelsang, P. Ferenci, S. Frotz, S. Meryn, and A. Gangl, “Acidic colonic microclimate—possible reason for false negative hydrogen breath tests,” Gut, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. Casellas, A. Aparici, M. Casaus, P. Rodríguez, and J. R. Malagelada, “Subjective perception of lactose intolereance does not always indicate lactose malabsorption,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 581–586, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus