Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 9730687 |

Daniel Mønsted Shabanzadeh, Lars Tue Sørensen, Torben Jørgensen, "Abdominal Symptoms and Incident Gallstones in a Population Unaware of Gallstone Status", Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 2016, Article ID 9730687, 6 pages, 2016.

Abdominal Symptoms and Incident Gallstones in a Population Unaware of Gallstone Status

Academic Editor: Mark Borgaonkar
Received26 Feb 2016
Revised18 May 2016
Accepted23 Jun 2016
Published18 Jul 2016


Introduction. Symptoms associated with newly formed gallstones have never been studied in a population unaware of their gallstones. The objective of this population-based cohort study was to determine which debut of abdominal symptoms was associated with newly formed gallstones. Materials and Methods. A cohort study was performed of a random sample from general population of Copenhagen. Participants had ultrasound examinations and answered questionnaires about abdominal symptoms at baseline and two reexaminations over 12 years. Participants were not informed of gallstone status. Inclusion criteria were no gallstones or cholecystectomy at baseline and attending a reexamination. Results. Of 3,785 participants, 2,845 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Changes in overall abdominal pain were not significantly different between incident gallstones or gallstone-free participants. Multiple adjusted logistic regression analyses showed that incident gallstones were significantly associated with debut of abdominal pain with projection, localized in the whole upper abdomen, and of longer duration. No significant associations for functional symptoms were identified. Conclusions. A new onset of abdominal pain with projection, localized in the whole upper abdomen, and of longer duration is associated with newly formed gallstones in participants unaware of gallstone status. Functional symptoms should not be the indication for surgical treatment.

1. Introduction

Gallstone disease is a frequent cause of hospital admissions with high costs as a consequence of treatment and morbidity [1, 2]. In spite of being highly prevalent in the general population and a substantial burden to healthcare providers, only few determinants of gallstone formation have been identified [3] and the symptoms associated with newly formed gallstones have only been sparsely investigated [4]. Debut of symptoms in incident gallstones has never been investigated in a population that was not aware of gallstone status.

Pain caused by gallstones has traditionally been linked to a symptom complex consisting of severe pain attacks of longer duration, with localization in the upper right abdominal quadrant and pain projection [5]. This “biliary colic” has been associated with prevalent gallstones in a number of cross-sectional and case-control studies performed in clinical and general populations [6, 7]. However, abdominal pain is frequent in the general population and specific pain localizations or characteristics are not necessarily associated with gallstones [8]. Prospective studies with ultrasound assessed incident gallstones will push us further in disentangling which symptoms could be attributed to gallstones.

The objective of this population-based cohort study was to determine which new abdominal symptoms were associated with newly formed gallstones assessed with ultrasound. Abdominal pain, localization, projection, characteristics, and functional symptoms were the symptoms of interest.

2. Materials and Methods

Data derives from a cohort study of a random sample from the general population. The random sample comprised 4,807 persons aged 30–60 years and living in 11 municipalities in the western part of the urban area of Copenhagen and was drawn by computer from the Civil Registration System in October 1982. People were invited by mail to attend baseline examination, and nonresponders were reinvited. Those who still did not respond were contacted by telephone and if they were not reached a third letter asking them to take contact by telephone was sent out [9]. Examination outside working hours and free transportation were offered if necessary. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrolment. Examinations took place after 12 hours of fasting and included an abdominal ultrasound to assess gallstone status and questionnaires about medical history including previous cholecystectomy, lifestyle, and abdominal symptoms. Participants were interviewed if errors or omissions had occurred in the questionnaire responses. The cohort was reexamined twice with ultrasound in 1987-88 and 1993-94. Gallstone incidence studies examining factors for gallstone formation have been published before [3, 10].

The outcomes of this study were the incident gallstones either as gallstones identified by ultrasound at reexaminations or as cholecystectomy performed during follow-up in participants without gallstones at baseline. Gallstones were defined as acoustic shadows that moved with gravity in a gallbladder lumen. Exceptions from the mobility criteria included the case where a stone was wedged in the infundibulum of the gallbladder or otherwise impeded by size, septa, or folds [9]. Other benign gallbladder findings such as sludge or polyps were not considered to be gallstones. Participants were not informed about gallstone status following ultrasound examination. This had been accepted by the local research ethics committee to avoid unnecessary treatment and patient worrying [10]. Only participants with no gallstones, with a gallbladder identified in situ at the baseline ultrasound examination, and who attended at least one reexamination were included in this study.

Abdominal pain within the previous year was the overall and unspecific symptom that was common to all of the abdominal symptoms and was therefore explored as a four-level categorical variable describing the changes in abdominal pain between baseline and follow-up as remaining symptom-free (reference), becoming symptom-free, persisting symptoms, and symptom debut. Debuts of specific abdominal symptoms within the previous year were the explorative variables of this study. They included pain projection to right shoulder or back, pain localization in the upper abdomen (under right rib, epigastrium, or whole upper abdomen), pain characteristics (frequency, duration, intensity, pain medication (often or every time), and pain at night), and functional gastrointestinal symptoms including the irritable bowel syndrome, dyspepsia, and number of stools per week. The irritable bowel syndrome was defined as abdominal pain and distension with additional borborygmi, altering stool consistency, or both. Dyspepsia was included as two symptom complexes including upper abdominal pain with nausea (dyspepsia nausea type) and upper abdominal pain with acid regurgitation or heart burn (dyspepsia regurgitation type). All of these functional symptom complexes have been identified through cluster analyses in the present cohort [11]. In order to identify which symptoms were specific for incident gallstones, symptoms were assessed both at baseline and at reexaminations. Only the debuts of symptoms at reexamination were of interest in this study due to the frequent occurrence of unspecific abdominal symptoms in the general population [8]. Symptoms were therefore included as dichotomous variables with the debut of symptoms as explorative variable and the reference group, thereby, consisting of remaining symptom-free, becoming symptom-free, or having persisting symptoms at reexamination when compared to baseline examination. If the participant had incident gallstones at one of the reexaminations, the symptom assessment from this reexamination was included. If the participant remained gallstone-free throughout the study period, the symptom assessment of the latest reexamination was included. Gallstone awareness at reexaminations was assessed by answering yes or no to the question “Have you ever been diagnosed with gallstones?”

Multiple models were built to assess possible confounding. These models included age, body mass index at baseline, units of alcohol consumption per week, and changes in alcohol consumption between baseline and reexamination. Social variables included cohabitant status defined by the civil status or whether or not the participant had been in a conjugal relationship, and social statuses I–V were defined by type of employment and educational level [12]. All of these covariates, except the social variables, have been identified as determinants of incident gallstones [3]. The distributions of symptoms and covariates adjusted for can be seen in Table 1. Both unadjusted and multiple adjusted analyses of association were reported.

Incident gallstones or cholecystectomy (%)/median [IQR]No gallstones (%)/median [IQR]Total (%)/median [IQR]Missing

SexFemale141 (55.1)1217 (47.0)1358 (47.7)
Male115 (44.9)1375 (53.0)1490 (52.3)

Age50.0 [40.0; 52.5]40.0 [30.0; 50.0]40.0 [30.0; 50.0]

Body mass index 24.2 [22.1; 27.2]23.8 [21.7; 26.4]23.9 [21.7; 26.5]

Consumption of alcoholUnits/week5.0 [2.0; 10.0]6.0 [2.0; 12.0]6.0 [2.0; 12.0]1

Cohabitant statusLiving with someone212 (82.8)2180 (84.1)2392 (84.0)
Alone29 (11.3)334 (12.9)363 (12.7)
Always alone15 (5.9)78 (3.0)93 (3.3)

Social groupI + II57 (22.3)500 (19.3)557 (19.6)2
III71 (27.7)731 (28.2)802 (28.2)
IV80 (31.2)824 (31.8)904 (31.8)
V48 (18.8)535 (20.7)583 (20.5)

Stools per weekNumber/week7.0 [6.0; 8.0]7.0 [7.0; 8.0]7.0 [7.0; 8.0]12

Sensitivity analyses were performed for the subgroup of participants that did not undergo cholecystectomy and for the subgroup still unaware of gallstones when attending the reexaminations. These analyses were performed in order to exclude the changes in symptoms following cholecystectomy and in order to exclude the possible recall bias in symptom assessment introduced through awareness of gallstone status. Awareness of gallstones is likely due to a clinical diagnosis of gallstones and may have been preceded by abdominal symptoms which caused the participant to seek medical help and, possibly, receive nonsurgical treatment of their gallstones.

Categorical variables were reported as counts and percentages of the population and continuous variables were reported as medians with the interquartile range (IQR). Associations between debuting abdominal symptoms and incident gallstones were analyzed with logistic regression. Estimates were reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Level of significance was set as a CI not including 1. Participants with missing variable data were excluded from the analysis of the missing variable only. All analyses were performed with the statistical software “R Studio” (RStudio Inc., Boston, MA). Reporting was performed according to the STROBE statement [13].

3. Results

A total of 3,785 individuals participated at the baseline examination, and of these 2,848 participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this study. During the study period, a total of 256 individuals developed gallstone disease, of which 250 had incident gallstones identified at ultrasound reexaminations and six had cholecystectomies among participants with no gallstones at baseline (Figure 1). Awareness of gallstones was present in 17 participants at reexaminations (6.6%).

Abdominal pain was common in the study population and high proportions of persisting abdominal pain were seen in both participants with incident gallstones and participants without gallstones. No significant changes were found in abdominal pain between baseline and reexaminations for incident gallstones compared to no gallstones (Table 2).

Incident gallstones or cholecystectomy group (%)No gallstones group (%)Unadjusted OR
95% CI1
Adjusted OR
95% CI1,2
Sensitivity analysis: without cholecystectomy2,3Sensitivity analysis: without stone awareness2,4

Remained symptom-free122 (47.7)1,240 (47.8)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
Became symptom-free51 (19.9)633 (24.4)0.82 [0.58; 1.15]0.91 [0.64; 1.30]0.90 [0.63; 1.28]0.92 [0.64; 1.33]
Persisting symptoms63 (24.6)473 (18.2)1.35 [0.98; 1.87]1.20 [0.86; 1.68]1.13 [0.80; 1.59]1.10 [0.77; 1.56]
Symptom debut20 (7.8)246 (9.5)0.83 [0.51; 1.35]0.70 [0.42; 1.16]0.67 [0.40; 1.11]0.64 [0.38; 1.09]

(total) = 2,848 (minus missing in adjusted analyses), (incident stones) = 250, (cholecystectomy) = 6, and (stone-free) = 2,592.
Adjusted for baseline sex, age, BMI (interaction with sex), units of alcohol per week, social groups I + II–V, cohabitant status, and changes in consumption of alcohol units per week (interactions with sex).
(total) = 2,842, (incident stones) = 250, and (stone-free) = 2,592.
(total) = 2,805, (incident stones) = 239, and (stone-free) = 2,565.

Incident gallstones were significantly associated with debut of abdominal pain with projection, localized in whole upper abdomen, and pain duration of hours to days in multiple adjusted analyses. No significant associations for incident gallstones and debut of general abdominal pain, localized under the right rib or in the epigastrium, localized pain with projection, frequent or intense pain, pain medication, pain at night, dyspepsia of the nausea or regurgitation type, the irritable bowel syndrome, or change in number of stools per week were identified (Table 3).

Symptom debut in incident gallstone group (%)Symptom debut in gallstone-free group (%)Unadjusted OR [95% CI]1Adjusted OR [95% CI]1,2Sensitivity analysis: without cholecystectomy2,3Sensitivity analysis: without stone awareness2,4

Abdominal pain with projection10 (3.9)28 (1.1)3.72 [1.79; 7.75]3.05 [1.43; 6.49]2.53 [1.12; 5.74]1.62 [0.61; 4.35]

Pain localizationUnder right rib6 (2.3)33 (1.3)1.86 [0.77; 4.48]1.43 [0.58; 3.54]0.99 [0.34; 2.90]0.76 [0.23; 2.54]
Under right rib with projection to back/right shoulder3 (1.2)5 (0.2)6.14 [1.46; 25.8]3.94 [0.90; 17.2]1.53 [0.17; 13.5]No events
Epigastrium17 (6.6)121 (4.7)1.45 [0.86; 2.45]1.34 [0.78; 2.30]1.29 [0.74; 2.23]1.15 [0.64; 2.05]
Epigastrium with projection to back/right side3 (1.2)20 (0.8)1.52 [0.45; 5.17]1.20 [0.35; 4.18]1.23 [0.35; 4.27]0.87 [0.20; 3.86]
Whole upper abdomen7 (2.7)12 (0.5)6.04 [2.36; 15.5]5.54 [2.02; 15.2]5.65 [2.06; 15.5]3.24 [0.96; 10.9]
Whole upper abdomen with projection to back1 (0.4)2 (0.1)5.08 [0.46; 56.2]3.09 [0.27; 35.5]3.18 [0.28; 36.5]No events

Pain characteristicsFrequency, weekly/daily9 (3.5)90 (3.5)1.01 [0.50; 2.03]0.78 [0.38; 1.59]0.80 [0.39; 1.64]0.63 [0.29; 1.40]
Duration, hours/days21 (8.2)115 (4.4)1.92 [1.19; 3.12]1.86 [1.13; 3.07]1.71 [1.02; 2.88]1.48 [0.85; 2.58]
Intensity, moderate/extreme20 (7.8)183 (7.1)1.12 [0.69; 1.80]0.98 [0.60; 1.60]0.89 [0.54; 1.49]0.83 [0.48; 1.42]
Pain medication, often/every time7 (2.7)44 (1.7)1.63 [0.73; 3.65]1.24 [0.54; 2.84]1.08 [0.45; 2.62]0.58 [0.18; 1.93]
Pain at night13 (5.1)155 (6.0)0.84 [0.47; 1.50]0.74 [0.41; 1.33]0.70 [0.38; 1.30]0.49 [0.24; 1.02]

Functional symptomsDyspepsia nausea type3 (1.2)31 (1.2)0.98 [0.30; 3.23]0.73 [0.22; 2.47]0.75 [0.22; 2.54]0.80 [0.24; 2.69]
Dyspepsia regurgitation type5 (2.0)57 (2.2)0.89 [0.35; 2.23]0.79 [0.31; 2.01]0.65 [0.23; 1.82]0.49 [0.15; 1.61]
Irritable bowel syndrome5 (2.0)39 (1.5)1.30 [0.51; 3.34]0.92 [0.35; 2.41]0.95 [0.36; 2.49]0.78 [0.27; 2.25]
Change in number of stools per week50.0 [−0.5; 2.0]0.0 [−1.0; 1.0]1.01 [0.97; 1.05]1.02 [0.98; 1.07]1.02 [0.98; 1.07]1.02 [0.97; 1.06]

(total) = 2,848 (minus missing in adjusted analyses), (incident stones) = 250, (cholecystectomy) = 6, and (stone-free) = 2,592.
2Adjusted for baseline sex, age, BMI (interaction with sex), units of alcohol per week, social groups I + II–V, cohabitant status, and changes in consumption of alcohol units per week (interactions with sex).
3 (total) = 2,842, (incident stones) = 250, and (stone-free) = 2,592.
4 (total) = 2,805, (incident stones) = 239, and (stone-free) = 2,565.
5Models also include baseline number of stools per week.

Sensitivity analyses of the subgroup excluding cholecystectomy changed none of the associations significantly. Although no significant associations remained when excluding gallstone awareness, the associations for pain localized in whole upper abdomen and of longer duration still had nonsignificant associations ( and , resp.) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

Incident gallstones assessed by ultrasound examination in a population unaware of gallstone status are associated with the debut of an abdominal symptom complex including abdominal pain with projection, localized in whole upper abdomen, and of longer duration. Subgroup analysis excluding participants with awareness of gallstones still showed a nonsignificant trend for this symptom complex and incident gallstones. No significant differences in the occurrence of overall abdominal pain were found in participants with incident gallstones or no gallstones.

Previous population-based screening studies or clinical studies with cross-sectional or case-control designs have explored associations between prevalent gallstones and abdominal symptoms. Meta-analyses of these studies have identified abdominal pain localized in the upper abdomen, epigastrium, or upper right abdominal quadrant, with radiation to the back or right side of constant character, causing use of pain medication to be associated with prevalent gallstones [6, 7]. One cohort study including participants aware of gallstone status identified pain in the right hypochondrium and epigastrium as predictive factors for incident gallstones or cholecystectomy [4]. The results from these previous studies are somehow supported by this study’s results, except for the pain localization in the right side of the abdomen or the use of analgesics.

The mechanisms involved in pain symptoms caused by gallstones are not completely identified but are suggested to be caused by the migration of a gallstone in the cystic or common bile duct [5]. Impaction of a stone might also cause distension of the gallbladder or the biliary tract and activation of visceral sensory neurons causing sensations of pain [14, 15]. Gallbladder dysmotility and decreased gallbladder emptying are generally a risk factor for gallstone formation [15]. A muscular component has been suggested to explain pain in a study correlating pain index and in vitro gallbladder smooth muscle contractility in patients undergoing cholecystectomy for uncomplicated disease [16].

An association of dyspepsia with nausea and vomiting has also been identified in previous studies [6]. The obvious advantage of this study’s design was the ability to distinguish between prevalent and incident symptoms and their association with incident gallstones. The present study concludes that dyspepsia or other functional symptoms associated with previously detected gallstones are not associated specifically with incident gallstones. Experimental studies have found low esophageal pH values in subjects with gallstones compared to controls as well as a low vagal tone and large antral volumes in the fasting and postprandial state in both subjects with gallstones and subjects with dyspepsia when compared to healthy controls [17, 18]. Gallstones and gastroesophageal reflux might, thereby, share common pathophysiological mechanisms.

The strength of this cohort study was the prospective design enabling the isolation of symptoms associated with newly formed gallstones. The disappearance of significant associations in the sensitivity analysis of the subgroup unaware of gallstones indicates that the symptoms identified in this study are the symptoms that push gallstone carriers to seek medical help. Since the participants were not informed about gallstone status, no recall bias was introduced when assessing symptoms at reexaminations. Accordingly, the findings of this study are more robust when compared to previous cohort studies, where the participants were informed about gallstone status. Since the sensitivity and specificity of gallstone detection by ultrasound are 90–95% and 94–98% [19], respectively, one limitation of this study is that some persons with false negative ultrasound examination at baseline but true positive ultrasound examination at reexamination might have been included as incident cases. Such potential misclassification bias might cause associations to become nonsignificant. Possible confounding was controlled for through multiple adjusted models. However, residual confounding might be present through diseases or medications causing gallstone formation and pain which were not controlled for in this study.

5. Conclusions

New onset of abdominal pain with projection, localized in whole upper abdomen, and of longer duration, but not functional symptoms, is associated with newly formed gallstones. Such symptoms probably push gallstone carriers to seek medical help. Gallstone patients should be considered for surgery or nonsurgical treatment based on these symptoms in the clinic and in future trials. Functional symptoms should not be the indication for cholecystectomy.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


This study was financially supported by the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences at the University of Copenhagen. The authors acknowledge Anja Lykke Madsen for data management, Rikke Kart Jacobsen for statistical supervision, and Karin Mønsted Shabanzadeh for language editing.


  1. J. E. Everhart, M. Khare, M. Hill, and K. R. Maurer, “Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States,” Gastroenterology, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 632–639, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. W. Russo, J. T. Wei, M. T. Thiny et al., “Digestive and liver diseases statistics, 2004,” Gastroenterology, vol. 126, no. 5, pp. 1448–1453, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. M. Shabanzadeh, L. T. Sørensen, and T. Jørgensen, “Determinants for gallstone formation-a new data cohort study and a systematic review with meta-analysis,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. Festi, A. Dormi, S. Capodicasa et al., “Incidence of gallstone disease in Italy: results from a multicenter, population-based Italian study (the MICOL project),” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 14, no. 34, pp. 5282–5289, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. Osler, The Principles and Practice of Medicine, Designed for the Use of Practitioners and Students of Medicine, Appleton, New York, NY, USA, 1909.
  6. N. Kraag, C. Thijs, and P. Knipschild, “Dyspepsia how noisy are gallstones? A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies of biliary pain, dyspeptic symptoms, and food intolerance,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 411–421, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Y. Berger, J. J. I. M. van der Velden, J. G. Lijmer, H. de Kort, A. Prins, and A. M. Bohnen, “Abdominal symptoms: do they predict gallstones? A systematic review,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 70–76, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Jorgensen, “Abdominal symptoms and gallstone disease: an epidemiological investigation,” Hepatology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 856–860, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. Jorgensen, “Prevalence of gallstones in a Danish population,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 126, no. 5, pp. 912–921, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  10. K. H. Jensen and T. Jørgensen, “Incidence of gallstones in a Danish population,” Gastroenterology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 790–794, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  11. L. Kay and T. Jørgensen, “Redefining abdominal syndromes. Results of a population-based study,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 469–475, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. Jorgensen, “Gallstones in a danish population: familial occurrence and social factors,” Journal of Biosocial Science, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 111–120, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  13. E. von Elm, D. G. Altman, M. Egger, S. J. Pocock, P. C. Gøtzsche, and J. P. Vandenbroucke, “The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies,” The Lancet, vol. 370, no. 9596, pp. 1453–1457, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. J. Schein and M. A. Rosenblatt, “Biliary calculus size as a factor in prognosis of silent stones,” Geriatrics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 257–260, 1957. View at: Google Scholar
  15. P. Portincasa, A. Moschetta, and G. Palasciano, “Cholesterol gallstone disease,” The Lancet, vol. 368, no. 9531, pp. 230–239, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. Wegstapel, N. C. Bird, R. Chess-Williams, and A. G. Johnson, “The relationship between in vivo emptying of the gallbladder, biliary pain, and in vitro contractility of the gallbladder in patients with gallstones: is biliary colic muscular in origin?” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 421–425, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. P. Portincasa, A. Di Ciaula, V. Palmieri, A. Velardi, G. P. Vanberge-Henegouwen, and G. Palasciano, “Impaired gallbladder and gastric motility and pathological gastro- oesophageal reflux in gallstone patients,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 653–661, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. T. Hausken, K. Søndenaa, S. Svebak et al., “Common pathogenetic mechanisms in symptomatic, uncomplicated gallstone disease and functional dyspepsia: volume measurement of gallbladder and antrum using three-dimensional ultrasonography,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 2505–2512, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. K. I. Marton and P. Doubilet, “How to image the gallbladder in suspected cholecystitis,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 722–729, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Daniel Mønsted Shabanzadeh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.