Research Article
The Continental Divide: Anti-TNF Use in Pediatric IBD Is Different in North America Compared to Other Parts of the World
Table 4
Access limitations identified by respondents. Results are presented as N (%).
| ā | North America | Europe | Elsewhere | p-value | N=183 | N=103 | N=58 |
| Access never limited for CD | 103 (56%) | 79 (77%) | 16 (28%) | <0.001 | Access never limited for UC | 99 (54%) | 76 (74%) | 18 (31%) | <0.001 | Access is sometimes limited in newly diagnosed CD | 35 (19%) | 12 (12%) | 19 (33%) | 0.005 | Access is sometimes limited before failure of steroids or EEN followed by IM in CD | 42 (23%) | 13 (13%) | 29 (50%) | <0.001 | Access is sometimes limited except in hospitalized, steroid-refractory UC | 20 (11%) | 9 (9%) | 12 (21%) | 0.067 | Access is sometimes limited in steroid-dependent UC before failure of steroids followed by an immunomodulator | 41 (22%) | 12 (12%) | 23 (40%) | <0.001 | Dosing regimen is sometimes limited | 32 (17%) | 9 (9%) | 20 (34%) | <0.001 | Duration of anti-TNF therapy is sometimes limited | 5 (3%) | 8 (8%) | 5 (9%) | 0.083 | Access to day clinics for infusion is sometimes limited | 14 (8%) | 5 (5%) | 6 (10%) | 0.418 |
|
|