Safety and Efficacy of a Small J-Tipped Guidewire for Pancreatic Duct Endoscopic Intervention

Table 5

Univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis.

	Univariate			Multivariate
Variable	OR	95%CI	P value	OR	95%CI	P value
Patient factor
Age < 60y	1.83	0.72 - 4.60	0.21
Female	1.73	0.77 - 3.88	0.18	1.57	0.69 - 3.57	0.28
Pancreatic cancer	0.98	0.32 - 2.98	0.97
Pancreatic cystic tumor	1.18	0.51 - 2.76	0.70
Chronic pancreatitis	1.16	0.45 - 3.03	0.76
Biliary disease	0.93	0.38 - 2.30	0.88
Intervention
Cunnulation time > 10 min	1.29	0.57 - 2.93	0.54
Endoscopic sphincterotomy	0.36	0.05 - 2.74	0.32
Intraductal ultrasonography	0.44	0.13 - 1.52	0.20	0.56	0.16 - 1.96	0.36
Blushing cytology	1.22	0.47 - 3.18	0.69
Pancreatic drainage
EPS	0.64	0.26 - 1.57	0.33
ENPD	1.02	0.45 - 2.27	0.97
Guidewire
Small J	0.26	0.09 - 0.78	0.02	0.12	0.09 - 0.85	0.02
PD findings
Flexion angle < 90°	0.96	0.43 - 2.17	0.92
Stenosis	1.09	0.39 - 3.04	0.87

CI, confidence interval; EPS, endoscopic pancreatic stenting; ENPD, endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage; PD, pancreatic duct; GW, guidewire.