Analysis and Follow up of Endoscopy Results in 1099 Patients with Terminal Ileum Lesions

Zhong, Qinglian; Zhang, Anye; Huang, Jian; Yan, Wen; Lin, Jiayu; Huang, Qun; Huang, Xiaoshan; Yu, Tao; Zhu, Luhong; Xu, Chen

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8838613

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Ethical Approval Consent Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 8838613 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8838613

Analysis and Follow up of Endoscopy Results in 1099 Patients with Terminal Ileum Lesions

Qinglian Zhong,^1,2Anye Zhang ,¹Jian Huang,¹Wen Yan,¹Jiayu Lin,¹Qun Huang,¹Xiaoshan Huang,¹Tao Yu,¹Luhong Zhu,¹and Chen Xu³

Academic Editor: Armand Abergel

Received11 Mar 2020

Revised09 Nov 2020

Accepted17 Nov 2020

Published07 Dec 2020

Abstract

Objective. We aim to analyze the diagnostic yield, diagnostic accuracy, and delayed diagnosis of patients with terminal ileum lesions, providing follow-up suggestions for suspected patients. Methods. We carried out an analysis of 1099 patients who had terminal ileum lesions in our hospital from 2009 to 2019. The endoscopy reports and histopathology reports of terminal ileal biopsies were recorded. Clinical diagnosis and management were reviewed to determine whether there was a need to correct after a follow-up endoscopy result. Results. A total of 1099 patients were found to have terminal ileum lesions, among which 959 in 1099 patients (87.26%) were diagnosed as benign, 17 in 1099 patients (1.55%) were diagnosed as malignant, and 123 in 1099 patients (11.19%) were diagnosed as suspected. The diagnostic accuracies of terminal ileal polyp, cyst, cancer, eosinophilic enteritis, parasite, lymphofollicular hyperplasia, and amyloidosis were 100%. The diagnosis was delayed in 9.93% of Crohn’s disease (CD) and 12.5% of lymphoma. Among the definite cases, the diagnosis was corrected during the follow-up in 12.5% of the patients, while the clinical treatment was corrected during the follow-up in 17.86% of the patients. Among the suspected cases, the diagnosis and treatment was corrected in 61.11% of the patients during the follow-up. Conclusion. Coincident diagnosis of ileitis and ileum ulcer is low. Delayed diagnosis of Crohn’s disease and lymphoma were observed in a certain proportion of patients with terminal ileum lesions. A follow-up endoscopy was strongly recommended for these suspected patients with terminal ileum lesions.

1. Introduction

The terminal ileum, an important part of the digestive system, is located at the most distant portion of the small intestine. It is the junction of small intestine and colon, where feces are accumulated, as well as the reflux from colon to ileum that could cause bacterial transplantation and translocation [1]. The special anatomical position and physiological characteristics of the terminal ileum may induce immune response that results in mucosal damage [2, 3]. However, the clinical presentation of terminal ileal lesions is similar to colon diseases, such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, hemafecia, anemia, and constipation, resulting that the ileal disease be often ignored or misdiagnosed. In recent years, the detection rate of terminal ileum lesions has been increasing due to the colonoscopy and terminal ileum intubation [4].

During the endoscopy, the presence of the terminal ileum lesions includes erythema, erosions, ulcers, mucosal friability, and granularity [5]. Such terminal ileum lesions may be the results of a wide variety of diseases affecting the terminal ileum. These diseases include lymphoid hyperplasia, lymphoma, radiation enteritis, infections, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn’s disease (CD) [1]. Particularly, the terminal ileum is the most frequent localization of Crohn’s disease. Recent studies pointed out the importance of early diagnosis of CD and suggest that patients receiving an earlier intensive treatment could have a better clinical outcome [6]. Misdiagnosis of CD may result in patients occasionally receiving an unnecessary operation or having inadequate response to therapy. However, it is still extremely difficult for the differential diagnosis of CD and other terminal ileitis [1, 7, 8]. In light of this, it would be interesting to learn more about terminal ileum lesions, especially for early CD screenings.

In this study, we investigated the terminal ileum lesions detected during endoscopy. We aimed to analyze the diagnostic yield, diagnostic accuracy, and delayed diagnosis of patients with terminal ileum lesions and to evaluate the need for a follow-up endoscopy for suspected cases.

2. Patients and Methods

The data were obtained from medical records and computerized endoscopy database in the Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, between January 2009 and March 2019. The hospital’s medical gastroenterology department performed more than 2000 colonoscopies per year. Five endoscopists currently staff the department. The study had been approved by the ethics committee of the University and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Additionally, written informed consent was obtained from the patients when they perform endoscopy. We performed an analysis of all patients with terminal ileal lesions who had terminal ileal biopsies during a colonoscopy (Olympus CF-240L, CF-260AZI) or enteroscopy (Fujinon EN-450P5/28). The endoscopic findings and histopathology reports of terminal ileal biopsies were recorded. Clinical diagnosis and management were reviewed to determine whether there was a change after a follow-up endoscopy result.

The main observations of the patients with terminal ileum lesions are as follows: ① disease spectrum; ② accuracy of diagnosis; ③ delayed diagnosis and management change; and ④follow-up suggestions of terminal ileum lesions according to the results of follow-up.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL). Numerical data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables were analyzed by the Chi-square test. A value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Terminal Ileum Lesions

A total of 1099 patients were found to have terminal ileal diseases, and 602 patients were male, while 497 patients were female, with an average age of 42.48 ± 16.5 years old (13–94 years old). The indications for endoscopy were abdominal pain in 405 patients (36.85%), diarrhea in 297 patients (27.02%), constipation in 70 patients (6.37%), and both in 28 patients (2.55%). Other indications were bleeding or anemia (n = 38, 3.46%), abdominal mass (n = 10, 0.91%), and weight loss (n = 8, 0.73%), etc. There were 268 asymptomatic patients (24.39%) (Table 1).

Endoscopic features of ileum lesions were nonspecific and often presented as ileitis (such as hyperemia, edema, erythema, and erosion), ulcer, hyperplasia, mass, stenosis and polyp, etc. Ileitis and ileum ulcer were mainly endoscopic findings both in established or suspected cases (Table 2).

Combined with endoscopic and pathological findings, there were 959 patients (87.26%) diagnosed as benign, including 476 patients of ileitis (43.31%), 249 patients of ileal ulcer (22.45%), 127 patients of CD (11.56%), 69 patients of lymphofollicular hyperplasia (6.28%), 12 patients of tuberculosis (1.09%), 9 patients of polyps (0.82%), 8 patients of eosinophilic enteritis (0.73%), 3 patients of cyst (0.27%), 2 patients of Behcet’s disease (0.18%), 2 patients of amyloidosis (0.18%), 1 patient of intestinal lymphangiectasia (0.09%), and 1 patient of parasites (0.09%). There were 17 patients of malignant lesions (1.55%), including 14 patients of lymphoma (1.27%) and 3 patients of cancer (2 patients of adenocarcinoma and 1 patient of small round cell tumor (2.27%). There were 123 patients (11.19%) of suspected patients with terminal ileal lesions, most were ileitis and ulcerative lesions, in which the clinical diagnosis was not clear yet (Table 3).

3.2. Follow-Up of Patients with Terminal Ileum Lesions

The flow chart of follow-up is summarized in Figure 1. There were 74 patients returned to our hospital for follow-up endoscopy and biopsy diagnosis. Most of the patients with benign terminal ileum lesions did not have any return visit. CD had a higher proportion of follow-up (22/127, 17.32%), followed by ileal ulcer (20/249, 8.03%) and ileitis (13/476, 2.73%) (Figure 2). Among 123 suspected patients, 50 patients were followed up by telephone, 21 patients without pathological results, and 29 patients without second colonoscopy. Another 55 patients were lost.

The diagnosis and management are summarized in Table 4. The diagnosis was corrected in 18 of 74 patients (24.32%) with ileitis or ileal ulcer. Among the 56 return patients with established initial diagnosis by endoscopy at the first time, 7 of 56 patients (12.5%) were diagnosed differently in follow-up and 10 of 56 patients (17.86%) changed the treatment. 3 patients with CD were found to be complicating intestinal tuberculosis during follow-up. Among the 18 return patients with suspected diagnosis, 11 of 18 patients (61.11%) alter the diagnosis and management after second check which is a surprisingly high ratio. One interesting case is an ileal ulcer patient who did not heal after 6-year tracked observation.

3.3. Accuracy and Delay Rate in Diagnosis of Terminal Ileum Lesions

The final diagnosis was reached based on the follow-up of terminal ileum lesions, symptoms, pathological results, and endoscopy findings. Our results showed that the accuracy was 100% for terminal ileal polyps, cysts, eosinophilic enteritis, parasites, lymphofollicular hyperplasia, amyloidosis, and cancer. There were 14 patients with delayed CD diagnosis (14 of 141 patients, 9.93%) and 2 patients with delayed lymphoma diagnosis (2 of 16 patients, 12.5%). However, the ileal ulcer had a poor coincidence rate.

3.4. Follow-Up Time of Patients with Terminal Ileum Lesions

The review time of the 74 patients ranged from 1.03 to 108.5 months, with an average of 21.92 ± 20.71 months. The mean delayed time of final diagnosis was 28.36 ± 25.3 months in 14 patients with CD, 22.37 ± 16.37 months in 2 patients with lymphoma, respectively.

4. Discussion

Our study shows that most terminal ileum lesions are benign, and a few are malignant. Mid-aged group has a higher incidence of terminal ileum lesions. Our results are consistent with the findings of several previous studies [9–11]. Combined with the endoscopic findings and pathological results, we achieved a high diagnostic accuracy in some ileum disease. The coincidence rates of ileum cysts, amyloidosis, eosinophilic enteritis, lymphofollicular hyperplasia, parasites, polyps, and cancer were 100%. Our results suggest that these 7 kinds of diseases can be diagnosed effectively, thanks to their specific pathological characteristics. However, the ileitis and ileal ulcer are nonspecific in pathological results. Thus, it is difficult to diagnose and distinguish in the early stage of many diseases that affect terminal ileum, such as intestinal tuberculosis, CD, and lymphoma. Therefore, the coincident diagnosis of ileitis and ileum ulcer is low.

Our study reveals that 24.32% of patients with ileitis and ileal ulcer developed into lymphoma and CD during follow-up. Some literature studies suggest it is not cost-effective to carry out ileoscopy on all patients [11–15] for reasons that ileitis and ileal ulcer are rarely developed to malignant diseases and their detection rate is low. However, from 2008 to 2016, literature review analyzed that the development of CD in the follow-up of ileitis patients ranged from 1.07% to 34.5% [16–21]. With the extension of follow-up time, the proportion of CD increased. Thus, our study suggests that follow-up should be encouraged on some selected patients, especially for those with isolated terminal ileal ulcer of unknown etiology, right lower abdominal pain, anemia, diarrhea, or clinically suspected CD [9–11, 15, 22, 23].

The early diagnosis of CD patients plays a critical role in the management of CD. In 2010, Peyrin-Biroulet [6] proposed a definition of early CD: the CD patient has a duration less than 2 years and no gastrointestinal injury and dysfunction. Meantime, they put forward a concept of “therapeutic window of opportunity.” It is believed that the earlier the intensive treatment for CD patients, the better to control the disease, injury, and disability. In 2011, international experts agreed to update the Paris definition of early CD based on the duration of disease after diagnosis (≤18 months) and without immunosuppressant or biological agents [24]. However, the exact timing of early diagnosis and treatment of CD has not been determined yet. Delayed diagnosis is still a problem for both CD patient and doctor, indicating the loss of the therapeutic window. In an IBD cohort in Switzerland, 75% of CD patients were diagnosed within 24 months [25]. A questionnaire survey of IBD patients in eastern China shows that only 33.0% of patients were diagnosed at the first visit [26]. In our cohort, 9.93% of CD was delayed in diagnosis at least, but in view of the excluded numbers of suspected cases, the proportion may be larger. Therefore, it is necessary to have follow-up ileal intubation less than 2 years to screen the early CD and get the final definition.

The reasons for delayed diagnosis are as follows: firstly, the clinical manifestations, endoscopic findings, and pathological features are not specific in early CD. Secondly, CD processed slowly over several years. Thirdly, of the 1099 patients with terminal lesions, 24.39% were asymptomatic and 87.26% were benign. Therefore, the follow-up visit was ignored or delayed.

Facing the difficulty in diagnosis of terminal ileitis, including CD and lymphoma, management algorithm for these patients with terminal ileum lesions is required. Besides the endoscopic and histopathological results of the individuals, their clinic characteristics, laboratory results, and imaging results are also crucial to diagnose and distinguish the disease [1]. It is also noted that there was individual difference in the patients and disease course in clinical practice, and an individual algorithm based on clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and histopathological evaluation of patients is encouraged.

In addition, our study showed there are 12.74% of ileum malignant lesions and suspected lesions. Thus, the endoscopists should not only look for colon diseases but also check the terminal ileum regularly to reduce the missing diagnosis. We also observed that there could be further development of the ileal diseases found in the second endoscopic biopsy, which leads to the correction of diagnosis and management. Thus, we strongly recommend a follow-up for ileal uncertain lesions in order to avoid the delayed diagnosis.

There are some limitations of this study. Some undiagnosed cases with nonspecific ileal lesions still need longer follow-up, which may affect the accuracy of the data slightly. We will extend the follow-up time and continue to observe the changes in the condition of these patients.

In conclusion, the coincident diagnosis of ileitis and ileum ulcer is low. Delayed diagnosis of CD and lymphoma were observed in a certain proportion of patients with terminal ileum lesions. A follow-up endoscopy was strongly recommended for these suspected patients with terminal ileum lesions.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical Approval

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients when they perform endoscopy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Qinglian Zhong and Anye Zhang contributed equally to this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Science and Technology Innovation Committee Foundation of Futian and Shenzhen, China (JCYJ20170818162537680 and FTWS2017019), and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030310318).

References

R. D. A. Goulart, S. M. Barbalho, R. G. Gasparini, and A. D. C. A. De Carvalho, “Facing terminal ileitis: going beyond crohn’s disease,” Gastroenterology Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Tabbaa, M. Golubic, M. Roizen, and A. Bernstein, “Docosahexaenoic acid, inflammation, and bacterial dysbiosis in relation to periodontal disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and the metabolic syndrome,” Nutrients, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 3299–3310, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. P. Elia, Y. F. Tolentino, C. Bernardazzi, and H. S. De Souza, “The role of innate immunity receptors in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease,” Mediators Inflamm, vol. 2015, p. 936193, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Jeong, K. J. Lee, Y. B. Kim, H. C. Kwon, S. J. Sin, and J. Y. Chung, “Diagnostic value of terminal ileum intubation during colonoscopy,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 51–55, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. H. Kim, K. J. Lee, Y. B. Kim et al., “Clinical significance of erosive and/or small ulcerative lesions in the colon and terminal ileum--short-term follow-up study,” Korean Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 321–327, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Peyrin-Biroulet, E. V. Loftus, J.-F. Colombel, and W. J. Sandborn, “Early crohn disease: a proposed definition for use in disease-modification trials,” Gut, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 141–147, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Bojic and S. Markovic, “Terminal ileitis is not always Crohn’s disease,” Annals of Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 271–275, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
S. D. James, P. E. Wise, T. Zuluaga-Toro et al., “Identification of pathologic features associated with “ulcerative colitis-like” Crohn’s disease,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 36, pp. 13139–13145, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. D. Melton, L. A. Feagins, M. H. Saboorian, and R. M. Genta, “Ileal biopsy: clinical indications, endoscopic and histopathologic findings in 10,000 patients,” Digestive and Liver Disease: Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 199–203, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Piao, “Analysis of endoscopy results in patients with terminal ileum lesions,” Journal of Jilin Medical University, vol. 40, no. 06, pp. 416–418, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
L. J. Neilson, R. Bevan, S. Panter, S. Thomas-Gibson, and C. J. Rees, “Terminal ileal intubation and biopsy in routine colonoscopy practice,” Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 567–574, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Jeong, K. J. Lee, Y. B. Kim et al., “Gastroenterology-Diagnostic value of terminal ileum intubation during colonoscopy,” Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 51–55, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
K. K. Y. Yoong and T. Heymann, “It is not worthwhile to perform ileoscopy on all patients,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 809–811, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sayilir, M. Kurt, M. Kekilli et al., “Diagnostic value of terminal ileum biopsy in chronic diarrhea with normal endoscopic appearance,” Journal of Digestive Diseases, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 188–192, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Hasitha Srimal, A. Priyadarsin de Silva, M. A. Niriella et al., “Usefulness of routine terminal ileoscopy and biopsy during colonoscopy in a tropical setting: a retrospective record-based study,” Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2014, Article ID 343849, 5 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Goldstein, “Isolated ileal erosions in patients with mildly altered bowel habits,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 838–846, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Petrolla, J. A. Katz, and W. Xin, “The clinical significance of focal enhanced gastritis in adults with isolated ileitis of the terminal ileum,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 524–530, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. L. Courville, C. A. Siegel, A. R. Wilcox, A. A. Suriawinata, and A. Srivastava, “Isolated asymptomatic ileitis does not progress to overt Crohn disease on long-term follow-up despite features of chronicity in ileal biopsies,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1341–1347, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-S. Vay, D. Lee, J. C. Kim et al., “Isolated terminal ileal ulcerations in asymptomatic individuals: natural course and clinical significance,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 1226–1232, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Donnell, P. Crotty, O. M. Sm et al., “Isolated active ileitis: is it a mild subtype of crohn’s disease,” Inflamm Bowel Dis, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1815–1822, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Zhang and Y. Ou, “Focal nonspecific ileocecum inflammation: a follow-up study of 66 cases,” Journal of Southern Medical University, vol. 36, no. 06, pp. 842–847, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Lin, J. Wu, and H. Liu, “Etiological analysis of 182 cases of terminal ileum lesions,” Chinese Journal of Endoscopy, vol. 25, no. 03, pp. 88–92, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
S. O’Donnell, P. L. Crotty, M. O’Sullivan et al., “Isolated active ileitis: is it a mild subtype of crohn’s disease?” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1815–1822, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Peyrin-Biroulet, V. Billioud, G. DʼHaens et al., “Development of the Paris definition of early Crohnʼs disease for disease-modification trials: results of an international expert opinion process,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 107, no. 12, pp. 1770–1776, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Vavricka, S. M. Spigaglia, G. Rogler et al., “Systematic evaluation of risk factors for diagnostic delay in inflammatory bowel disease,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 496–505, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Qiao, The Present Situation of Diagnostic Delay of Crohn’s Disease in Eastern China and the Natural History of Perianal Fistula in Crohn’s Disease, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China, 2019.

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Qinglian Zhong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1777

Downloads

1116

Citations